Originally posted by BornOfSin
reply to post by boncho
Ignore mainstream science? You are forgetting the very obvious truth that most of 'mainstream science' was not that long ago considered to the ravings of madmen when they were first proposed. The Earth was flat, etc.
The fundamental thing to remember is that when mainstream sciences 'theories' can't offer explanations that fit all the 'facts' about what is going on, the logical conclusion is that there must be another explanation. This is the premise of the pursuit of truth.
My theory incorporates most of the changes we are seeing at a global level and is plausible. If you believe I am crazy, prove me to be wrong in what I am saying, don't just discount it in the fashion that people did when it was proposed the Earth was round.
Originally posted by BornOfSin
reply to post by inverslyproportional
The Mayans, Babylonians and Sumerians knew more about EVERYTHING than we do today with all our technology.
So laughing at that premise is a little ignorant.
Stellar parallax is most often measured using annual parallax, defined as the difference in position of a star as seen from the Earth and Sun, i. e. the angle subtended at a star by the mean radius of the Earth's orbit around the Sun. The parsec (3.26 light-years) is defined as the distance for which the annual parallax is 1 arcsecond. Annual parallax is normally measured by observing the position of a star at different times of the year as the Earth moves through its orbit. Measurement of annual parallax was the first reliable way to determine the distances to the closest stars. The first successful measurements of stellar parallax were made by Friedrich Bessel in 1838 for the star 61 Cygni using a heliometer. Stellar parallax remains the standard for calibrating other measurement methods. Accurate calculations of distance based on stellar parallax require a measurement of the distance from the Earth to the Sun, now based on radar reflection off the surfaces of planets.
The proper motion of a star is its angular change in position over time as seen from the center of mass of the Solar System. It is measured in seconds of arc per year, arcsec/yr, where 3600 arcseconds equal one degree. This contrasts with radial velocity, which is the time rate of change in distance toward or away from the viewer, usually measured by Doppler shift of received radiation. The proper motion is not entirely "proper" (that is, intrinsic to the star) because it includes a component due to the motion of the solar system itself. Due to the constant, and unvarying speed of light (that is also constant; without regard to whatever is the velocity of the eminating or reflecting source), the true (i.e., instantaneous) velocities of distant stars cannot be observed; the observed proper motion reflects the motion (velocity) of a star at the time the light was emitted from that source.
The motion of a star relative to the Sun can provide useful information about the origin and age of a star, as well as the structure and evolution of the surrounding galaxy. The components of motion of a star consist of the radial velocity toward or away from the Sun, and the traverse angular movement, which is called its proper motion. Radial velocity is measured by the doppler shift of the star's spectral lines, and is given in units of km/s. The proper motion of a star is determined by precise astrometric measurements in units of milli-arc seconds (mas) per year. By determining the parallax of a star, the proper motion can then be converted into units of velocity. Stars with high rates of proper motion are likely to be relatively close to the Sun, making them good candidates for parallax measurements. Once both rates of movement are known, the space velocity of the star relative to the Sun or the galaxy can be computed. Among nearby stars, it has been found that population I stars have generally lower velocities than older, population II stars. The latter have elliptical orbits that are inclined to the plane of the galaxy. Comparison of the kinematics of nearby stars has also led to the identification of stellar associations. These are most likely groups of stars that share a common point of origin in giant molecular clouds.
In physics (especially astrophysics), redshift happens when light seen coming from an object that is moving away is proportionally increased in wavelength, or shifted to the red end of the spectrum. More generally, when an observer detects electromagnetic radiation outside the visible spectrum, "redder" amounts to a technical shorthand for "increase in electromagnetic wavelength" — which also implies lower frequency and photon energy in accord with, respectively, the wave and quantum theories of light.
Originally posted by BornOfSin
LOL .. I don't give a # about book sales ... I said READ it, not BUY it. I refer to book as a long document, bigger than a thesis.
I'll be posting the whole things online, NOT selling it. I'll come back here to put up the links when I do.
The idea was to get in before someone 'steals' these ideas. The reason being that in recent weeks, certain cosmological 'discoveries' as they call them, have been released to press just after I've come up with the theories.
So either I am tuning into someone elses work somehow, or they are tuning into mine. It's about getting a published date of record for the concept online. Before someone else.
Before you all start looking at my intentions, go look at the bl#$dy evidence yourself!!! Did you miss the whole 'SUCKED INTO A VORTEX' part.
Stop relying on me to verify its validity for you and go use google.
Goodnight.edit on 21-3-2013 by BornOfSin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Druscilla
reply to post by eriktheawful
but. but. but. How can you deny the shining radiance of undeniable TRUTH that comes directly from the willfully self marginalizing undereducated militantly anti-education self appointed prophets and seers that get all their 'higher' knowledge through magical osmotic processes that either involve staying off their meds, or self medicating with nonprescription recreational 'enhancements' which then therefore allow them to commune with secret invisible imaginary telepathic booty buddies that are so overwhelmed with concern for the well being of the human species that they trust their most important messages and teachings to the people that will be least of all likely listened to?
[insert any of half a dozen inspirational transcendental, channeling, stuff by the sun, hokey pokey videos plagued with sitar and moaning chant like musical background videos that no one will watch here]
edit on 22-3-2013 by Druscilla because: (no reason given)