It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why we are in Korea
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Bicent76
Why we are in Korea
Why hide behind pleasantries? Just say it. Why we "invaded" Korea, why we still "occupy" Korea. Sounds nicer the way you say it though. We are only "in" Korea.
Why we "occupy" Korea Is to maintain a foot hold on the Asian continent. Militarily its real important considering we lost that other one, ummm... Vietnam? I'll bet if you survey them, they will tell you good riddance.
Ramping up rhetoric to demonize a country or its leaders is really a weak excuse to maintain an illusion of superiority. MSM been doing it a lot lately. And guess what, it bleeds over to ATS with the same droll: Bad President and WMD. Really? WMD ! WMD !
Goes to show that people will believe anything the more you repeat it.
Originally posted by netwarrior
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Bicent76
Why we are in Korea
Why hide behind pleasantries? Just say it. Why we "invaded" Korea, why we still "occupy" Korea. Sounds nicer the way you say it though. We are only "in" Korea.
Why we "occupy" Korea Is to maintain a foot hold on the Asian continent. Militarily its real important considering we lost that other one, ummm... Vietnam? I'll bet if you survey them, they will tell you good riddance.
Ramping up rhetoric to demonize a country or its leaders is really a weak excuse to maintain an illusion of superiority. MSM been doing it a lot lately. And guess what, it bleeds over to ATS with the same droll: Bad President and WMD. Really? WMD ! WMD !
Goes to show that people will believe anything the more you repeat it.
A foothold? Really? Have you seen the numbers of US troops in South Korea? 28,000 men spread across all four branches, combat and non-combat, against 9.4 million active, reserve and paramilitary soldiers. They could literally march en masse, rifles in hand, from the DMZ to Seoul and would take the peninsula before we could get mobilized. You can do things like that when you don't care about attrition. I don't recall which book i read it from (some military fiction novel) but the author made the remark that the guys stationed at the DMZ would be barely a speed bump. It could have been Tom Clancy, but i'm a bit foggy.
No, we are there because we have been asked. If the S. Koreans didn't want us there you'd hear about it. The south actually *has* free speech. I don't like our soldiers overseas, but I am glad they are in Korea. They need to be.
A grim Ministry of Defense (MOD) “URGENT ACTION” bulletin to all Strategic Missile Forces (SMF) is warning these nuclear units to prepare for “Dead Hand” operations over growing fears that at least 5 atomic-bomb equipped North Korean submarines have “successfully evaded” US Naval Forces and are preparing to strike targets in South Korea, Japan and North America. According to this MOD bulletin, North Korea conducted its third underground nuclear test in seven years on 12 February after which Russian defense analysts noted a series of “highly suspicious” transfers of “unknown materials” from the Punggye-ri Nuclear Test Facility to the Mayang Do Naval Base where shortly thereafter at least 10 Yono-class miniature submarines [1st photo right] departed and are feared to have aboard them atomic bombs.
To North Korea’s war strategy in employing these atomic bomb equipped submarines, this MOD bulletin warns, is to attack their enemies vital shipping ports which, if successful, could destroy the entire global economy. Russian military analysts contributing to this MOD bulletin note that the most likely targets for these atomic bomb equipped North Korean submarines include South Korea’s Port of Busan, Japan’s Port of Yokohama, and the United States ports of Seattle (Washington) and Oakland (California). Unbeknownst to the American, South Korean and Japanese peoples about these North Korean mini submarines, and perhaps best stated by the US National Defense magazine, is that the US Navy has already admitted that it has “no silver bullets” able to defeat them. To how vulnerable the Western coastal areas of the United States currently are was noted by Russian military intelligence experts on 8 November 2010 after a Chinese submarine successfully penetrated American waters and launched a missile in full view of Los Angeles, and as we can read, in part, as reported by the Infowar News Service:
Originally posted by expatwhite
reply to post by larapa
Not sure as to the validity of that site, but it makes very scary reading. However, would NK be able to miniaturise the warheads to fit on torpedo's? And would the US have "lost" them? I thought the US could pretty much track anything, even the ultra quiet stuff
Once they have powered up their batteries, the submarines can sail to the bottom of coastal waters and remain undetected for days. Though they can't travel long distances or sail very quickly, advancements in technologies, such as air-independent propulsion and fuel cells, have allowed diesel submarines to extend theft operational ranges underwater.
Critical to note about North Korea’s CHT-02D torpedo, this MOD bulletin warns, is that it is capable of being armed with a small nuclear device similar to that of the United States M-28 or M-29 Davy Crockett Weapon System developed in the 1950’s and having a yield equivalent to somewhere between 10 or 20 tons of TNT.
Originally posted by Bicent76
yea, whatever...
I am no longer listening to this bullcrap.. Because that is all it is Bullcrap.. North Korea is nothing but a trash talking punk, like one of those little dogs that just barks but does not dare bite a big dog .
I would not worry about it, 72 hours ago, the USA was threatened with nuclear war and an invasion...
That was bullcrap and so is this...
Even when they do attack they will get the snot beat out of them, and beg almost all at once for us to stop, yet we will not, we will take that damn country....
So I am guessing once this idiot finally does what he is saying he will do the sooner the better for the people, we will just annex another country on this Planet...edit on 13-3-2013 by Bicent76 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by larapa
reply to post by ArchaicDesigns
This is beggining to get a bit scary not sure how much i trust the eutimes though anyone know if there reputable?
www.eutimes.net...
This article source is Sorcha Faal. A known hoaxster.
North Korean Atomic Bomb Subs Cause Global Panic
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
Originally posted by intrptr
reply to post by Bicent76
Why we are in Korea
Why hide behind pleasantries? Just say it. Why we "invaded" Korea, why we still "occupy" Korea. Sounds nicer the way you say it though. We are only "in" Korea.
Why we "occupy" Korea Is to maintain a foot hold on the Asian continent. Militarily its real important considering we lost that other one, ummm... Vietnam? I'll bet if you survey them, they will tell you good riddance.
Ramping up rhetoric to demonize a country or its leaders is really a weak excuse to maintain an illusion of superiority. MSM been doing it a lot lately. And guess what, it bleeds over to ATS with the same droll: Bad President and WMD. Really? WMD ! WMD !
Goes to show that people will believe anything the more you repeat it.