It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Daedalus
reply to post by Phage
nice videos, by the way....but without knowing the circumstances under which they were filmed, they're kinda useless..
Not really. Hourly operating cost of a G1 Gulfstream is about $2,700/hr. $50k would buy a good amount of airtime with extras for the crew, testing, etc.
the means to indepemndently test the trails would most likely be somewhere in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars...
Not really. There are flight levels which are conducive to maximum efficiency. There are no "reserved" levels.
but there is a flight level range that is traditionally reserved for commercial traffic.
Except that they demonstrate that sampling contrails would not be difficult.
but without knowing the circumstances under which they were filmed, they're kinda useless..
No. Contrails trap longwave (infrared) radiation. They don't trap automobile pollution. Way too high to do that.
our airplane pollution is trapping in all our automobile pollution. Just a vicious cycle.
The idea of rerouting probably holds more promise but in any case it would lead to increased costs with, at this point, an uncertain benefit.
Maybe they're going to try to put something in the contrails to help them dissipate faster?
Yes, and they're going to just keep talking about it because they don't know how to solve the issue. While they're twiddling their thumbs, our airplane pollution is trapping in all our automobile pollution.
Originally posted by Daedalus
reply to post by Phage
i believe you missed the point.
the means to indepemndently test the trails would most likely be somewhere in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions of dollars...
as to the regs, i may have mis-spoke on that.....i can't find a specific regulation earmarking an altitude range for commercial traffic, but there is a flight level range that is traditionally reserved for commercial traffic.
Originally posted by stars15k
reply to post by Daedalus
Okay, so facts are not important to you.
Neither is science or logic.
You believe, you will always believe and no one can change your mind.
If you can't approach me on the same level, we can't discuss this rationally.
To make a claim of "chemtrail" you have to know what is in a "chemtrail."
To just say it's a "chemtrail" because it looks like one, is not on the same level as my research.
Sorry you are bothered by my approach.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by tsurfer2000h
It's all a problem. You can't isolate any pollution and say one is worse than the other because they all combine.
Originally posted by tsurfer2000h
reply to post by yoursteppingonmytoes
That's a bit of trolling if I've ever seen it. Well done.
Thanks I am glad you enjoyed them..
Now, can you prove any of what was said in those videos wrong?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Daedalus
let us suppose for a moment that chemtrails are real....and let us suppose for a moment that their purpose is to modify weather, and to increase the content of certain elements in the atmosphere...
assume that is true for a moment...
Why would I want to ASSUME any of that is true?? why would I not want some evidence of it?
.....think on that for a moment..
when I think on that I notice that the whole point relies upon initially accepting a bunch of assumptions for which there is no credible evidence.
Why would you bother thinking about a conclusion based on such feet of clay in the first place?
Why not put that effort into finding out whther or not those assumptions have any actual basis, and, finding no evidence for them, not bother worrying about it?
Did you know that the U.S. Congress has been holding hearings on solar radiation management, (SRM), a geoengineering technique which intends to mitigate global warming by blocking sunlight from the earth? Geoengineering (as laid out by the Council on Foreign Relations in their “Unilateral Geoengineering” workshop May 2008) is defined as “Any of a variety of strategies, such as injecting light-reflecting particles into the stratosphere, that might be used to modify the Earth’s atmosphere-ocean system in an attempt to slow or reverse global warming.” Yeah, things didn’t go well in Copenhagen, but not to worry, atmospheric scientists to the rescue. House testimonies of scientists Ken Caldiera, John Shepard, James Fleming, Alan Robock, and Co-director of the American Enterprise Institutes’ Geoengineering Project Lee Lane can be found at: http/science.house.gov/Publications/hearings_markups_details.aspx?NewsID=2668.
The scientists testimonies lay out possible “future” geoengineering techniques including the SRM Aerosol Program. This is described as being administered by military jets, high in the atmosphere, laying down particles of sulfur dioxide which effectively haze the sky and dim the sun. Other candidates include hydrogen sulfide and soot. “A broad range of materials might be used as stratospheric scatterers,” says Lee Lane. ”Potential types of particles for injection include sulfur dioxide, aluminum-oxide dust, or even designer self-levitating aerosols” (CFR Unilateral Geoengineering workshop, May 2008).
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Based on what? Even a 747 only cost somethign in the order of $20k per hour - why would you need hundreds of thousands for smaller aircraft flying a number of relatively short missions??
www.technologyreview.com...
Here is the plan. Customize several Gulfstream business jets with military engines and with equipment to produce and disperse fine droplets of sulfuric acid. Fly the jets up around 20 kilometers—significantly higher than the cruising altitude for a commercial jetliner but still well within their range. At that altitude in the tropics, the aircraft are in the lower stratosphere.
The planes spray the sulfuric acid, carefully controlling the rate of its release. The sulfur combines with water vapor to form sulfate aerosols, fine particles less than a micrometer in diameter. These get swept upward by natural wind patterns and are dispersed over the globe, including the poles