It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No they didn't. Tracer chemicals were used to study how biochemical agents would disperse.
Read up and you will see that they used Biochemical Warfare samples over Dorset.
Well for one thing the amount of public outrage over the Porton Down experiments.
Now if they were allowed to do that to the locals then what will stop them doing it over whole of the UK?
Originally posted by RoyBatty
I never, ever see just one trail from one plane (ok, or two) and then none from the others. I would love this explained thoroughly but until then, my own eyes and brain tell me it's atmospheric.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by NeoVain
The only people who don't seem to be addressing things is those who believe that contrails are "chemtrails". Can you indicate what has not been address by the others?
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
reply to post by network dude
Well you have said that no one has been able to prove that chemtrails exist which I find very lol lots of testimonials and official papers prove you wrong. Also the government in the UK has even admitted that yes we have been spraying since the war. Read up and you will see that they used Biochemical Warfare samples over Dorset. Now if they were allowed to do that to the locals then what will stop them doing it over whole of the UK?
Laws that have changed since then perhaps?
But even if ther isnt' anything - what is het evience that theyARE doing it? by all means be suspicious - but suspicion is not evidence that it is happening
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Daedalus
what is is being discussed is similar-looking plumes of obvious spraying being done at much lower altitudes than the ones at which a contrail would normally form.
No. What is being discussed is an interview in which SRM through stratospheric aerosol dispersion (geoengineering) is being discussed. One of those claims is that this "spraying" is "shredding the ozone layer". The stratosphere is not at "much lower altitudes". The ozone layer is not at "much lower altitudes".edit on 2/27/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Any single point of evidence can of course be explained away in some way, like the patents, the lingering spread of the patterns in the sky, the "checkerboards", the environmental effects, the dulled light absorption, the leaked internal memos, the official admittance of certain officials, etc etc etc.
Originally posted by Afterthought
reply to post by RoyBatty
If you're in Denver, you seriously need to research the climate engineering going on in your state. Start with the paper I posted on page 6 of this thread.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The further you read, the more Colorado is mentioned.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Sk8ergrl
No they didn't. Tracer chemicals were used to study how biochemical agents would disperse.
Read up and you will see that they used Biochemical Warfare samples over Dorset.
Well for one thing the amount of public outrage over the Porton Down experiments.
Now if they were allowed to do that to the locals then what will stop them doing it over whole of the UK?
Don't see what that has to do with "chemtrails" though.
edit on 2/27/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I sort of missed that part. Can you point it out?
i thought i was slogging through pages of "lol, ur a dumbass, because i said so, hurrrr"
Welcome to ATS. The home of being accused of being a shill or agent because of a difference of opinion.
where anyone who believes there is something to the existence of them is berated for having a difference of opinion
Originally posted by Trueman
If we pay attention, maybe we will notice a similar profile between the people who deny chemtrails.
Some Clues :
What else do they deny?
What kind of job do they have?
.... you know what I mean
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by NeoVain
Any single point of evidence can of course be explained away in some way, like the patents, the lingering spread of the patterns in the sky, the "checkerboards", the environmental effects, the dulled light absorption, the leaked internal memos, the official admittance of certain officials, etc etc etc.
You see what you did there? You included some completely unsubstantiated claims as "points of evidence". What environmental effects? What dulled light absorption? What leaked internal memos? What official admittance?
Originally posted by Sk8ergrl
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Sk8ergrl
No they didn't. Tracer chemicals were used to study how biochemical agents would disperse.
Read up and you will see that they used Biochemical Warfare samples over Dorset.
Well for one thing the amount of public outrage over the Porton Down experiments.
Now if they were allowed to do that to the locals then what will stop them doing it over whole of the UK?
Don't see what that has to do with "chemtrails" though.
edit on 2/27/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Please explain to me then why did the locals suffer with health problems after they sprayed.
Originally posted by TrueAmerican
reply to post by network dude
Fair enough. Apology accepted. That is extremely rare here. So you earn new respect in my book.
Can you at least believe me when I tell you all I was after was some commentary on what the guy is talking about, considering he does have some creds? lol, heck, I am on your side really. Or...was...or...partly am...or heck... I'm confused.
Please explain to me then why did the locals suffer with health problems after they sprayed.
The views expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or the United States government.
This report contains fictional representations of future situations/scenarios. Any similarities to real people or events, other than those specifically cited, are unintentional and are for purposes of illustration only.