It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by RobinB022
reply to post by YapTalk
I believe that EVERYONE has the right to self defense by all means necessary. If a convicted felon who has paid his debt to society and has changed his ways, he too deserves to protect himself and his family.
There have to be exceptions for those felons who have abused awomanperson by force and who likely won't change even after imprisonment. Infact, oftentimes prison or jail can make these type of criminals worse after than before their punishment. It just makes no sense to put a weapon back in the hands of a person who is a felon, not when the felon involved violence or death threats on another person. No sense at all.
Other felons can't [or shouldn't] be compared to those of the violent persuasion.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
There is no difference between me working on my bow or crossbow and the local drunk tuning up his car in his yard.
Should I call the local police and tell them I think he's tuning up his car so he can drive it while intoxicated?
Originally posted by MajorKarma
Having now seen that video of the young-man in England being interviewed by police after being arrested for having a box cutter in his backpack, I never again want to hear from any English, British or whatever they wish to call themselves say another G D Word about our 2nd Amendment or how we should or should not live here in the United States. Any human being who would allow their government treat them like this and make laws like this and behave like this are not fit to speak, let alone give us advice.
If you want to live like they live in England, GO THERE!edit on 13-1-2013 by MajorKarma because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Kryties
Originally posted by HomerinNC
There is no difference between me working on my bow or crossbow and the local drunk tuning up his car in his yard.
I don't know where to begin with this. How ridiculous. The two have NOTHING to do with each other and that argument is only used as a strawman to deflect the topic.
Should I call the local police and tell them I think he's tuning up his car so he can drive it while intoxicated?
The 2nd amendment s just a few lines on a piece of paper that will NEVER be exercised, otherwise they would have been already.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
They have EVERYTHING to do with each other, BOTH are inanimate objects
Thats right, he was doing NOTHING WRONG, neither was I
One is used for transportation, the other has NO OTHER USE except killing living beings.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by Kryties
Again, my neighbor wouldn't have known my history, unless he is paranoid, snooped thru my mailbox, got my name and went to the courthouse.
I have NEVER used a weapon against another person IN MY LIFE, not even when I was in the Army. NEVER.
Originally posted by Briles1207
OH NO!! "they" are trying to take your bows and arrows? How on earth will you ride unto battle upon thy mighty steed?
Ridiculous.
Who on earth needs a crossbow in this day and age anyway?
Like guns, they are a tool for killing.
I am also assuming that if you have the money to own a weapon you do not need to hunt for food.
You guys crack me up!
Originally posted by RobinB022
Why is everyone so angry about this topic of gun/bow/sword?etc. ownership? May as well have real conversation w/o the anger and hateful attitude, because our guns aren't going anywhere anytime soon.