It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
this alignment is claimed from ancient scriptures
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by storm2012
You mean an object can orbit a more distant and smaller object which is orbiting a larger and closer object instead of that larger and closer object. That must be a pretty interesting looking orbit.
Originally posted by eriktheawful
The sun does not orbit Alcyone, and Alcyone does not orbit Sirius.
First, neither star existed when the sun and our solar system formed. Their ages are less than 100 millions years, and the sun is over 4.5 billion years old.
Second: Alcyone is almost 400 lightyears distant. The total mass of that star is not enough allow the sun to orbit it. Not when the sun is moving 220 km/s. Sorry.
Third: Alcyone is not orbiting Sirius (nor is the sun, even though we are literally hundreds of light years closer to Sirius than we are Alcyone), for the same reasons regarding mass, distance and speed).
Last: as Phage pointed out, it's impossible for our 3 stars to align in the way the OP says, because neither of those stars lay withing the galactic plane in a way that would allow us to do that.
Why do people keep trying to insist on this stuff? Insisting that ancient people had knowledge that was sometimes advanced is fine. Insisting that they knew astronomy better than we do to day is utter tripe.
Do you think what you wrote above will hold up 200 years from now?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien
Do you think what you wrote above will hold up 200 years from now?
In case you didn't notice. We're talking about 24 hours from now.
Go look at Alcyon and Sirius. Are they lining up?
Do you think they're going to suddenly jump across space and time to do so? On second thought don't bother answering that. You'll just come up with some more irrelevant nonsense.
edit on 12/19/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
The Maya are well known for their precise calendar and astronomy. The four surviving written documents (which are called the Dresden, Madrid, Paris, and Grolier Codices) that they have left behind include an ephemeris that charts the heliacal risings and settings in the synodic cycle of the planet Venus and an eclipse warning table based on observable lunar and solar cycles. The astronomic complexes in important Maya cities, are called "E Groups", after the E group in Uaxactú Structure E-VII, "Temple of the Masks", north viewUaxactún, in Petén, Guatemala. One of the most notable series of buildings at the site is that E Group in Uaxactún, the 3 small temples, E1, E2, E3, mark the solstices and equinoxes and the stela is the observation marke, from the Masks templeformed by Structures E-1, E-2, and E-3, which are aligned north-south and form an astronomical observatory, the first found in the Maya world. From a observation point on a nearby pyramid, named Temple of the Masks or structure E-sub VII, the early Maya could watch the sun rise behind these buildings and mark the summer and winter solstices (the longest and shortest days of the year) as well as the vernal and autumnal equinoxes (when day and night are of equal length).
While the best minds in Europe thought the world was 5000 years old, the Maya were writing accurate descriptions of celestial events that happened nearly 500 million years in the past. They wrote about cycles in the heavens that are longer than the known age of the universe. We don't know how accurate they were. All of these calculations were done by hand, based on observations made without telescope, sextant, protractor, compass, or any other known instrument. The idea that the Maya, essentially a stone age tribe, could produce calculations of such extreme accuracy that Europe could not duplicate them for thousands of years would seem totally incredible were it not so well documented. The Maya astronomical accomplishments are clearly recorded on paper in the Dresden Codex in Germany.
Uniquely, there is some evidence to suggest the Maya appear to be the only pre-telescopic civilization to demonstrate knowledge of the Orion Nebula as being fuzzy, i.e. not a stellar pin-point. The information which supports this theory comes from a folk tale that deals with the Orion constellation's area of the sky. Their traditional hearths include in their middle a smudge of glowing fire that corresponds with the Orion Nebula. This is a significant clue to support the idea that the Maya detected a diffuse area of the sky contrary to the pin points of stars before the telescope was invented.[28] Many preclassic sites are oriented with the Pleiades and Eta Draconis, as seen in La Blanca, Ujuxte, Monte Alto, and Takalik Abaj.
The point is: just because it's "ancient", doesn't mean that it's foolish, nonsense, or BS.