It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Disclosure of the moon landing hoax.

page: 58
62
<< 55  56  57    59  60  61 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 05:51 PM
link   
why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

nice hd camera and all well it was not so hard to put humans there in 69
.

they have just blown xxxxx on wars so how much for a saturn v .

if they still have the plans



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 05:54 PM
link   
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

Right. Spend a billion dollars to prove to a few nuts that the Apollo landings happened. And they wouldn't believe it anyway.



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 06:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

Right. Spend a billion dollars to prove to a few nuts that the Apollo landings happened. And they wouldn't believe it anyway.
they are just scrapping 8 billion of hardware in the middleast just saying ps when you print the money who cares with the odd billion



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 06:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

Right. Spend a billion dollars to prove to a few nuts that the Apollo landings happened. And they wouldn't believe it anyway.
how many americans % believe that



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 07:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

Right. Spend a billion dollars to prove to a few nuts that the Apollo landings happened. And they wouldn't believe it anyway.
how many americans % believe that


It all ways runs about 6 or 7 percent of americans think moon landings were hoaxed. But then again i can get 7 percent of people to believe in unicorns so all and all not many.



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 07:35 PM
link   
reply to post by dragonridr
 

so lets get a camera up there whats a billion when 27 million americans not including the illegals can be proved wrong and 2 why is there not one there



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 07:44 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie
so lets get a camera up there whats a billion


So what have you done to get a camera up there? how much have you donated?



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 07:45 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie
reply to post by dragonridr
 

so lets get a camera up there whats a billion when 27 million americans not including the illegals can be proved wrong and 2 why is there not one there


We all ready did but doesnt seem to change peoples mind. Funny thing about conspiracies is any evidence can be dismissed by saying well they facked that. So no proof can ever be given short of flying them to the moon and i dont think thats going to happen. So is it really worth spending money to prove it when it a few are so jaded that theyll just find a way to dismiss it? Look at this thread there is overwhelming evidence that we went to the moon yet people still argue we haven't. So obviously facts mean nothing to people luckily they are a small percentage or we would all be in trouble.



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 07:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by billdadobbie
so lets get a camera up there whats a billion


So what have you done to get a camera up there? how much have you donated?
they have this printing press thing called the fed how much has america spent on weapons etc this year my 2 cents



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 08:17 PM
link   
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


So instead of putting money into a new manned system, our a new probe for some of the more interesting moons in the solar system, we should spend hundreds of millions that we don't have, to take pictures that won't prove anything, because a tiny fraction of the population doesn't believe in it?



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 08:47 PM
link   
reply to post by Zaphod58
 


beats the sxxt out of killing women and children with money you do not have with drone strikes .

they got enough rovers on mars ?? or just wait and the chinese will do it soon



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 08:56 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by billdadobbie
so lets get a camera up there whats a billion


So what have you done to get a camera up there? how much have you donated?
they have this printing press thing called the fed how much has america spent on weapons etc this year my 2 cents



The Federal reserve does not print money willy-nilly. Every time they print additional money and add it to the economy (such as by spending billions to appease moon-hoax people) it makes the money that was already in the economy less valuable, which could lead to inflation.

That's why the printing of additional money is tightly controlled and planned out -- i.e., to curb inflation.



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 09:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by Soylent Green Is People

Originally posted by billdadobbie

Originally posted by hellobruce

Originally posted by billdadobbie
so lets get a camera up there whats a billion


So what have you done to get a camera up there? how much have you donated?
they have this printing press thing called the fed how much has america spent on weapons etc this year my 2 cents



The Federal reserve does not print money willy-nilly. Every time they print additional money and add it to the economy (such as by spending billions to appease moon-hoax people) it makes the money that was already in the economy less valuable, which could lead to inflation.

That's why the printing of additional money is tightly controlled and planned out -- i.e., to curb inflation.

what planet are you on the fed does not print money willy nilly
next you will be saying that america has no debt lol



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 10:50 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie
why when nasa can put rovers on mars do they not put one on the moon and settle this .

nice hd camera and all well it was not so hard to put humans there in 69
.

they have just blown xxxxx on wars so how much for a saturn v .

if they still have the plans


honestly.. what will this prove??

people believe curiosity is fake.. if NASA decided to do this and provided HD footage of the lunar landing sites, i will guarantee that not a single HB will believe it.

they will all continue to claim that the live HD footage is fake and the saga continues, this will prove nothing the only that can probably convince them is to fly them there themselves.. but i bet some will say they were brainwashed by the CIA into seeing it with their own eyes or something.
edit on 23-6-2013 by choos because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:03 PM
link   
reply to post by choos
 

no we have better telescopes now it is a conspiracy that could easy be put to bed even watched from earth without humans having to go back ???



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:14 PM
link   

Originally posted by billdadobbie
reply to post by choos
 

no we have better telescopes now it is a conspiracy that could easy be put to bed even watched from earth without humans having to go back ???


an example..

the LRO which beamed back the highest resolution images of the lunar landing sites ever has been completely dismissed by the HB community as fake.

rovers beaming back HD images of the same sites will change nothing.



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:22 PM
link   
reply to post by choos
 


but still no wheels on the ground in all those years how easy for nasa to put a rover on the moon



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:26 PM
link   
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


Why should we bend over backwards to try to satisfy a small group of people, most of which wouldn't believe Apollo was real if they stood on the moon looking at a lander and tracks?



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:36 PM
link   
reply to post by billdadobbie
 


should be easy enough with funding.. but they need a good reason to do so..

will taking pictures of the lunar landing sites be a good enough reason to spend several million dollars?? ask yourself if you are willing to pay for that? the scientific community knows that NASA landed on the moon so they do not need further proof..

its just the HB.. so NASA should spend several million dollars purely for HB?? not to mention that HB wont even believe the images/video are real, most likely photoshopped or something..

keep in mind rovers can only traverse maybe 100miles in its lifespan.. the moon is much much much larger than 100 miles..



posted on Jun, 23 2013 @ 11:52 PM
link   
reply to post by choos
 

think of the pr value half the planet does not trust the american goverment/nasa and all it would take is a few little rovers that do not require air. water/return trip




top topics



 
62
<< 55  56  57    59  60  61 >>

log in

join