It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
It seems that despite the choice of atheism, people are still being merely religious. To switch one ideal (God) for another (no God), and to fight for that ideal is not being any different than any of our theistic brothers and sisters.
It's weird how we don't believe there is a such thing as a God yet we like to argue over it anyways. And we feel we must justify our convictions by making others feel stupid for believing differently. That's religion for you.
Originally posted by ANOK
reply to post by Wonders
But science is not people just saying things, and expecting people to believe them without evidence.
The scientific process...
Ask a Question
Do Background Research
Construct a Hypothesis
Test Your Hypothesis by Doing an Experiment
Analyze Your Data and Draw a Conclusion
Communicate Your Results
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I have one for you.
There is a digital flying unicorn connection for your computer that is 100,000 times faster than wifi and all you need to do is hit F7 three times to get connected. As for God, compare Him to wifi. We can't see it and most of us don't know how the protocol works, yet we have faith it is there connecting us to the hub because it is evident. Not only this, but we can demonstrate the fact by the wireless connection we get on our laptops. Compare this to the believer's connection to God. The connection is obvious and the results speak for themselves. History demonstrates what is unseen and the signs that God is there are all around us if we are properly connected. The signal is always good and anyone with faith can attest to what is received.
The password is FAITH and the SSID is JESUS.
edit on 14-11-2012 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by darkhorserider
How do we know the person 3 cars over is staring at us?
How did my mother always know when to call me?
How did the person I was just talking about 5 minutes ago, who hasn't visited my office in months, happen to walk up while I was discussing her?
Why does prayer or meditation make us feel better, and how do you explain the clarity that comes from it?
What is love? The love that isn't familial, and isn't lust, but is true, unconditional love. Where does it stem from, and what is the motivation for it?
For that matter, what is charity? Why do humans feel compelled to help the weakest among us? It doesn't help the species, and it doesn't provide any direct feedback, so why is there an emotion tied to charity?
I'm not a fan of any religion, but I do believe there is a spiritual aspect to the universe.
Originally posted by jiggerj
LOL I noticed a few recent threads of religious fanatics with no Atheists arguing their point. Have we given up? Are these zealots too far gone to be saved from looking foolish?
I have a question for them. Oh, I know there's no getting through to them, but I'd love to see their responses.
First, a little story: God is riding on a flying unicorn to get to the pots of gold at the end of rainbows before the Leprechauns can snatch them up and hide the gold in a dragon's lair.
Question: Which character(s) in that story is real, and which ones aren't real. On those you claim to be unreal, please prove it. Thanks!
Originally posted by SpearMint
Most of the time it's like arguing with a toddler putting their fingers in their ears and screaming "LALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU", with ridiculous counter arguments, a complete absence of logic and a frustrating ignorance of anything scientific.
What's the point, there's always going to be stupid people on the internet.edit on 14-11-2012 by SpearMint because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rollsthepaul
I've quit opposing the religious because it has the appeal of picking my nose and eating it. Religion is on it's way out but many with strong religious beliefs could have serious mental problems, as things develop over the next four years. Basically, they are just too dumb to know better and they will also get past their religious stage and maybe even in this lifetime. Let's leave them alone because they have enough problems trying to live their lives based on bull#.
Originally posted by Prezbo369
That'd be nice, but unfortunately things like this are happening right now and by holding a mirror to theists it might be possible to speed that process up a jot,
“Some beliefs are so dangerous that it may be ethical to kill people for believing them”
Sam Harris, The End of Faith, pp.52-53.
“Some beliefs are so dangerous that it may be ethical to kill people for believing them”
Sam Harris, The End of Faith, pp.52-53.
His essay "Response to Controversy" also clarified the context of the apparently troubling passage, which was that he was referring to very specific cases like that of the religiously motivated terrorist, where the attempt to kill a murderous terrorist would essentially constitute killing someone for a belief they hold, namely the belief that unbelievers of their particular faith should be killed.[18]
Wikipedia
Originally posted by pthena
reply to post by adjensen
“Some beliefs are so dangerous that it may be ethical to kill people for believing them”
Sam Harris, The End of Faith, pp.52-53.
I haven't read the book, but I read the synopsis. It did not receive ringing endorsement. But think about it for a while. This sort of killing is already taking place, (war on terror, drone assassinations, etc, fanatic West Bank settler movement, etc. ) What's the difference between the various cases?
His apologetics for this morality (which he also uses to justify torture) aside, Harris is hailed as one of the philosophical leaders of the new secularism now on the rise in much of the world. If you don't think that statement is one of the most frightening things a public figure has said in recent memory, you don't understand it.
Originally posted by adjensen
I wouldn't be so sure that your side presents particularly palatable alternative views, though.
Originally posted by pthena
Is there some reason that Humanists must be lumped together as if they all followed the same leader?
Originally posted by LesMisanthrope
It seems that despite the choice of atheism, people are still being merely religious. To switch one ideal (God) for another (no God), and to fight for that ideal is not being any different than any of our theistic brothers and sisters.
It's weird how we don't believe there is a such thing as a God yet we like to argue over it anyways. And we feel we must justify our convictions by making others feel stupid for believing differently. That's religion for you.