It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ToadInAHole
reply to post by salainen
So the fire burned the wood next to the building , but not the wood of the building that exploded and created the fire ?
It didnt even scortch the grass , that`s very odd in my opinion.
Originally posted by diesel_actual
reply to post by Tecumte
The Couple, (wife teacher, Husband sound engineer for local company) that died were not in the house that exploded....The house that exploded was owned but owners wife/child were in Ohio, Husband was not at house either.edit on 11-11-2012 by diesel_actual because: added infoedit on 11-11-2012 by diesel_actual because: added
Originally posted by salainen
Originally posted by ToadInAHole
Yes , that much i gathered , but i`m asking - if most of the wood was fired away from the explosion how could a fire spread without fuel ?
It must have been a big explosion to throw the bricks around and damage near by homes , so if it was gas the fire ball would have been huge.
Note : the blue dye on the tips of the timber shows shoddy craftsmanship , a real craftsman trims them off to make the job look neat. Irellevant i know , but i`m a joiner (carpenter) by trade.
The fire didn't spread, hence the wood isn't burned... Fireball went upwards, not sideways. Homes very close burned, but only because they were close.
delete
Originally posted by delusion
By what evidence is there any kind of 'info blockade', or reports that witnesses are forbidden from talking about this?
If there isn't any evidence for this, please don't claim there is.
When people are talking about natural gas, do they mean commercially supplied gas, or natural, wild, raw, uncontrolled gas residing under the ground? If it's commercially supplied, are they in tanks by the side of the house or in pipes under the ground? I'm not familiar with 'natural gas' so much over here, it may be more common in America.
Originally posted by diesel_actual
The Fire shortly after the explosion
Originally posted by salainen
Originally posted by ToadInAHole
reply to post by salainen
So the fire burned the wood next to the building , but not the wood of the building that exploded and created the fire ?
It didnt even scortch the grass , that`s very odd in my opinion.
Consider other house fires, does grass usually burn? Also remember that the fire brigade was there pretty soon. It was a big fire, but it may not have spread onto the roads etc.
Originally posted by diesel_actual
The Fire shortly after the explosion
Originally posted by magma
reply to post by akira6968
IF a 100lb bomb were dropped on the house,
Why , oh , why would somebody want to drop a 100lb bomb on a residential house?
The 2 x teachers really are not a good enough reason.
Wasn't the house empty anyway?
UFO is way more plausible
Originally posted by Tecumte
Originally posted by diesel_actual
The Fire shortly after the explosion
I don't know, maybe it's just me, maybe too much late night ATS sites, but the for sale sign in that pic looks like a prop for whatever reason maybe just for taking a picture. It just deosn't look like what I would expect hanging in that way outside a home in that area.
TNT equivalent of 1 cubic meter of methane = 8.29 kilograms.
I didn't say anyone WANTED to drop the bomb there. And I just closed the damn page I had opened that said "over the course of their use, military has f'd up like 70 drones" (paraphrasing, obviously).