It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
The hospital I work at is under severe financial distress DIRECTLY due to Obama policies which he put into place in 2010. I haven't had raises, Doctors were forced to take a 30% pay cut, and we are way under water. Can't blame Bush, Obama directly did this.
The more than 2.7 million jobs lost or displaced in all sectors include 662,100 jobs from 2008 to 2011 alone
What does your answer have to do with Obama saying the cost for medication was too high and he would allow the importation of cheap generic drugs from Canada, and then Obama making backroom deals with Big Pharm companies ensuring he would break his promise if they backed the ACA?
What does this have to do with the people who are only off the unemployment books because they quit looking for work, and are still not employed?
What does this have to do with the fact MOST of the jobs gained under Obama have been low wage part time jobs?
How about you do some research and tell me what group has benefited under Obama. I don't think I mentioned Darden Foods, nice deflection and obfuscation. It won't work. Please answer my question, which had nothing to do with Darden Foods.
ETA: How long does their waiver last for by the way? And why give a waiver at all unless it's an admission this is a hardship on businesses?
Originally posted by hououinkyouma
Originally posted by OccamsRazor04
The hospital I work at is under severe financial distress DIRECTLY due to Obama policies which he put into place in 2010. I haven't had raises, Doctors were forced to take a 30% pay cut, and we are way under water. Can't blame Bush, Obama directly did this.
They will always find some excuse to blame Bush for that too. If Obama wins again it will be a big step back in the economy. And the country will lose even more influence in the world.
This has been the case in past elections. In statistics this is called a “Bayesian prior,” as in prior assumption. Today, including that prior gives President Obama a win probability of 97%.
Originally posted by Tazkven
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
I am sure there are other towns across the nation with similar stories, I am not naive enough to believe its only Louisville.
So where did those jobs go? No one seems to know.
But hey, China now has the largest middle class in the world.
HMMMMMM ....
What Obama did not say, however, was that the nation shed 4.3 million jobs during the early days of his term, and that the net gain since he took the oath of office in January 2009 is just 125,000 jobs.
Originally posted by muse7
Lets see how biased Nate Silver really is
Nate Silver gives Obama a 77% chance of Winning
BetFair gives Obama a 68% chance of winning
and..
InTrade Gives him a 64% chance of winning
yup! really skewed his numbers are! he must be a shill
Originally posted by muse7
Lets see how biased Nate Silver really is
Nate Silver gives Obama a 77% chance of Winning
BetFair gives Obama a 68% chance of winning
and..
InTrade Gives him a 64% chance of winning
yup! really skewed his numbers are! he must be a shill