It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The original prediction model from Bickers and Berry was one of 13 published in August in "PS: Political Science and Politics," which is an American Political Science Association peer-reviewed journal. The publication has published a collection of presidential election models every four years since 1996. Berry said that this year the models showed the widest split in outcomes.
Of the models, five predicted an Obama win. Five forecast a win for Romney. And the remaining three declared the race a toss-up.
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by Razimus
Link to your graphic?
Also the source of the graphs I posted are from Nate Silver who is a statistician who correctly predicted the 08 race and all of the senate races that year.
Look him up
Originally posted by muse7
Also keep in mind that Nate Silver and Sam Wang are not pundits, and their reputation is on the line.
Originally posted by Kituwa
Nate has been an open supporter of the President and his newspaper just endorsed Obama (although it also went for Dukakis, so it ain’t that good at picking winners).
1. Nate isn’t very good at calling close elections. In 2010, he correctly predicted the outcome of the senate elections with the greatest leads. But in the 5 genuinely close races, he got it wrong in 3. For the House elections, Nate ran this extraordinary headline: “House Forecast: G.O.P. Plus 54-55 Seats; Significantly Larger or Smaller Gains Possible.” So, this oracle predicted that the results could have been “larger” or “smaller” – how prescient. In fact, they were much larger. The Republicans took 63 seats.
blogs.telegraph.co.uk...
Nate Silver is partisan and wrong. The voters will decide Romney v Obama, not The New York Times
Originally posted by sad_eyed_lady
There are 3 types of lies: lies, damned lies and statistics
www.york.ac.uk...
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by AthlonSavage
Good on you sir.
Glad you haven't fallen victim to the ATS Right wing echo chamber
Originally posted by luciddream
reply to post by LeoStarchild
Why do i care? cause i don't want an Iran's Nuke misdirected at my country because one of the candidate is a warmonger.
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
I don't waste my time with stupid questions
Originally posted by cconn487
Originally posted by muse7
reply to post by OccamsRazor04
I don't waste my time with stupid questions
There are no stupid questions, only stupid answers. You know the drill