First, it's a "singlet", not a stinglet or a stringlet and is named such due to the "single" nature of it....
This is what happens when people read pop-sci articles then misinterpret them...
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
I believe posting several sites that deal with Super String Theory would allow for anyone here to give me the benefit of any doubt that it was a typo...YES...Stringlet...STRINGLET!
You seem to have a way to bring out the Worse in people. You do not know who I am or what I do...but if you did...you would be stuttering. Split Infinity
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by wildespace
Very true, but if it can become a neutron then it can reverse it's process to go back into a proton. Correct?
plus, just out of curiosity, ever heard of Ethers?
Originally posted by john_bmth
reply to post by SplitInfinity
Don't project your own ignorance onto humanity. You speak for yourself, not the rest of us.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by wildespace
But what if, all the scientific evidence of it in the mainstream is burned up and the only way to find it is around here, in the alternative news sites?
The reason why I say this is because Ether physics, or Aether physics, is a very old physics. And has been proven to hit on the mark every time. Tried it, and it was true.
Originally posted by FreedomCommander
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Not my point. But since you've brought that up, I question on who in the world disproved it?
So far, it's alive and well, it just goes under another name today, say quantum physics.
I like to hang around the old stuff, they know what they are talking about. The +5000 years stuff.
or you can just have a quick glance at this.edit on 3-11-2012 by FreedomCommander because: (no reason given)