It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
When I read 'Paedo Ring' ... I immediately think of little girls under the age of 10 but actually these stories involve girls from 13 upwards!!
I'm not saying its right because it is still underage but maybe some of these girls were actually putting themselves forward for sex.... think about it, there are young teens wanting to get to know famous people, their eyes all starry-eyed and such.... and also there are many who start out having sex at a young age! Also many look older than their age so at 13 she may look 16 or may even say she is 16!
Maybe I jumped the gun with this thread as I thought we were dealing with those under 10!!
Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
reply to post by blupblup
I did say 'it doesnt make it right'
You must have seen young girls who act and look a lot older??
I have.... many get into clubs these days!
Originally posted by magoo22
reply to post by Guyfriday
No I don't think 'they' will start a war to cover this up, I never said that. I think 'they' have already pushed us into war constantly since ages gone, we still are in Afghanistan etc, look at the world mate it's all war!
Originally posted by AGWskeptic
Originally posted by Guyfriday
This could explain why those dead girls were found on the Queens property over the last few years. (I'm not saying she had anything to do with it, but those stories did go away fast)
Also this shouldn't surprise anyone. "Skull and Bones" has a ritual where members stand before each other (nakied) and confess their sexual misdeeds. From my understanding this is done once a year to re-establish bonds between members (regardless if they're still at Yale, or not). What a great way of controlling others in power. Allow them to sexually act with no regards to morals, then use that information to control them. Classic "S&B".
First of all, the royals are not involved in the MP's office, they're mostly ceremonial at this point.
So it's doubtful that a friend of an MP's aide would also have ties to the royal family.
Secondly, the skull and bones rumor about the sexual confessions has never been confirmed. And there have been many leaks from former bonesmen, but none of them say this happens.
And these leaks have been many, you can find lists of bonesmen all over the net.
When you consider they have been co-ed since 1992, I seriously doubt this goes on.
Originally posted by something wicked
Hmmm, ok, The murders on royal estate were followed up, I watched on the BBC website out of interest, but as they were not actually related to the Royal family (i.e. there was no evidence to link them) they were treated as local news. Sad maybe, but people are murdered every day, again sadly, so not all make national news throughout the lifecycle to arrest and sentencing.
With the skull and bones thing, interesting, but is that for another topic.
With your last point about swinging type groups, we may all hold an opinion, but if there is no crime committed, not sure what the issue is? I may agree with it, I may not - you may also hold either opinion, but if it is between consenting adults, then there is no crime (there may be a divorce as a result, but that is a different matter).
Originally posted by RP2SticksOfDynamite
reply to post by something wicked
I didnt say anything about you speaking english. It was your understanding of what is written and I dont mean syntax errors. I was referring to the convenient ignoring of words which set context like "more" etc. I intimated that there maybe be some involvement on JM's part and at the very least in the 90's cover up. Just because I said he gave me the creeps doesnt mean I was suggesting he was a P, but there are always possibilities. And I have thrown no libellous anything. I have mentioned no one by their name! And not brave but more careful than yourself!!
Your response and previous responses reflect your niave and argumentative mindset. They also reflect a clear ouch!!
Watch the news and how the JS story develops....
D.p Sh.t!!!
Originally posted by Guyfriday
Originally posted by something wicked
Hmmm, ok, The murders on royal estate were followed up, I watched on the BBC website out of interest, but as they were not actually related to the Royal family (i.e. there was no evidence to link them) they were treated as local news. Sad maybe, but people are murdered every day, again sadly, so not all make national news throughout the lifecycle to arrest and sentencing.
Could I get a link to this. It seems that I missed something, and if I did I would like to know what it was.
With the skull and bones thing, interesting, but is that for another topic.
I was just pointing out that this style of behavour isn't anything new (I could also have used the Roman Catholic Church, but I thought that was to extreme of an example)
With your last point about swinging type groups, we may all hold an opinion, but if there is no crime committed, not sure what the issue is? I may agree with it, I may not - you may also hold either opinion, but if it is between consenting adults, then there is no crime (there may be a divorce as a result, but that is a different matter).
I was only pointing out that many groups are simular to this type of activity, but we only hear about the ones that get caught doing something illegel. Thats all.