It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by randyvs
Stop dodging.
This is related to faith because it substantiates a cause for faith. However, unsubstantiated faith leads to a crisis of faith, so how about you answer the question and give this faith some substance?
We're all waiting. Those of us with functional IQ's, that is.
If you don't need evidence to make a claim, then you are not reliable and bear no credence. This means that you may as well stop pretending to be right, because it would be quite safe to assume that you stand as much chance of being wrong as being right.
'unsubstantiated failth' is what you term mainstream religion as?
That you are alive today alone proves that such faith had been substantiated. I know not many would have studied history, but history - records of human existance of the past till present - had provened how barbaric some tribes of mankind were.
And where did those moral and ethical guidelines for a civilisation to exist come from?.
Do spend more time on studying in mainstream religions, rather than living in your fantasyland of a supposed 'consciousness' which you cannot even use history or science to explain, but that which only exists within your deluded low IQ mind.
Not at all my functional one. It just means we disagree on what evidence is . Mr. functionality.
ev·i·dence/ˈevədəns/
Noun:
The available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.
val·id/ˈvalid/
Adjective:
Actually supporting the intended point or claim; acceptable as cogent: "a valid criticism".
co·gent/ˈkōjənt/
Adjective:
(of an argument or case) Clear, logical, and convincing.
Surely you predicted my response.
Originally posted by GafferUK1981
reply to post by randyvs
We know exactly what you class evidence as, it is what you believe and what is written in the bible. You can't substantiate your evidence with any external physical sources.
On a scientific basis your evidence doesn't hold water.
I'm not well-versed in irrationality. I'm just familiar with your response every time someone makes a good point.
Thank for your honest reply, and your admittance to the works of men as a reference for your deluded beliefs.
If you do not accept religion or attempt to study the subject relevant to this thread, do at least study history, not just kennedy's year, but way back when civilisation began and left recorded history.
If you do not, then your 'contributions' to this serious thread of a fellow human whom is making enquries on relgious matter is absolutely out of your depth, for your ignorances is telling.
You can't bring anything spiritual into your lop labs. Therefore nothing spiritual exists. It's retarded.
Originally posted by GafferUK1981
reply to post by SeekerofTruth101
Exactly a day is one rotation of our planet. So what exactly is a day to god?
Get out of this one too, when god says let there be light it is accepted that he created the sun yet we KNOW the sun was here long before the earth so why does the bible suggest he created the earth before the sun.
It's funny that you call yourself the seeker of truth yet you are ignorant of scientific fact. You're not looking very hard or you seek with closed eyes.
SIgh...you are indeed showing your infantile age, wiping any doubt that I had of you that you are a matured adult I had been dealing with.
My point in that post was this:- which years was God talking about - Earth, or from where He created the Universe.
If He was standing on Earth and claimed it was 7 days, not impossible for a Creator, but for the sake of puny minded folks whom cannot count beyond ten, let alone billions of years, what would 7 years from the universe be in terms of Earth years if not perhaps even trillions?
If you had read further the bible than just thumbing through the first page of the Bible, you would have realize that prophets - messengers of God, had attempted to enlightened the limited minds of our uneducted ancestors, which sadly, you seem to come from there too, over the issue of timeframes.
I never said nothing spiritual exists. I