It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
That is a good question.
But easy to answer.
A mass like a rock consists of many different compressed particles. Each particle has a specific mass/weight.
How much the rock weighs compare to our standard measurement depending on the atmosphere you measure the rock in.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by PurpleChiten
My teacher is just a human being who works as a teacher. This does not mean he understand this at all.
A work description or a title dose not mean correct knowledge. Its just like religion. A priest or a pope don't have to know more about God then a person who is not a priest or a pope.
Originally posted by spy66
If yo dive and let out some air. Where will it go and why?
If you take the vacuum tunnel were there is no mass underneath the 10kg mass. the 10kg mass would not be effected by earth gravity.
If you try to determine the weight of the vacuum column, what weight you you measure half way through earth.
I bet zero weight all the way.edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
The SOHO should have traveled faster then earths is orbeting the sun.
Originally posted by fiftyfifty
reply to post by spy66
No I haven't done that experiment. You didn't answer my question about the moons gravitational effect on the Earth. I'm not trying to be smart or make you look stupid, I am genuinely trying to help you to understand so at least explain to me why you think that your theory is correct?
Gravity and atmosphere (air) are unrelated. There are planets without an atmosphere for example which still maintain a gravity because of their mass. In the case of this tunnel you are speaking of, it isn't just floating, it is in direct contact or infact a part of the 'surface' of the Earth's interior. Is this not the same as the bell resting on the base of the jar?
Things don't float in a vacuum, they float in an environment where there is no gravity. Inside the earth there will always be gravity. Where you are within the Earth will affect which direction the force of gravity is acting upon a subject. In the centre of the Earth, the centre of gravity would act equally from all directions meaning that there would be nowhere to fall to.
And the bell in our and your experiment was pre placed on the surface. No, so it wouldn't move.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by renegadeloser
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
Gravity. Remove the vacuum tunnel from the equation for a moment. Place the mass on the ground. Where does the mass go? It's not flying away just because the vacuum tunnel is gone, right? It stays on the ground, why? What is keeping it on the ground? If you think it's something other than gravity say so now. If you agree it's gravity holding it down then add the vacuum tunnel now. The same gravity is still there but the ground has been replaced by the vacuum tunnel enabling the mass to fall. This doesn't change the gravity pulling the mass down, you've only removed the earth that was supporting the mass. Are you with me so far?
Well if we remove the vacuum tunnel. It is the atmosphere that keeps the 10kg to the ground.
The atmosphere that keeps the 10kg mass down comes from particles/gasses produced from earths solids,water and plants. Earths mass in it self doesn't keep the 10kg mass on the ground.
If earth didn't have a atmosphere. Earth's center wouldn't read much pressure/mass. because there wouldn't be a force pushing the top layers down to the center.edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
If the atmosphere holds the mass down, then what holds the atmosphere down?
I have answered this one before.
Our atmosphere consists of gasses with different weight/mass. The lighter the gas is the further up it will be.
The lighter gasses keep heavier gasses from traveling up. Our atmosphere comes from particles emitted from earths solids, plants and water.
A weather balloon raises up because of the weight of the gas inside the balloon is lighter than the gases close to the surface. If you fill the balloon with air it will not raise unless it is heated up.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by PurpleChiten
My teacher is just a human being who works as a teacher. This does not mean he understand this at all.
A work description or a title dose not mean correct knowledge. Its just like religion. A priest or a pope don't have to know more about God then a person who is not a priest or a pope.
The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which unskilled individuals suffer from illusory superiority, mistakenly rating their ability much higher than average. This bias is attributed to a metacognitive inability of the unskilled to recognize their mistakes.[1]
Actual competence may weaken self-confidence, as competent individuals may falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. Kruger and Dunning conclude, "the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others".
Kruger and Dunning proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:
1) tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
2) fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
3) fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
4) recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they are exposed to training for that skill
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by john_bmth
That is quite interesting. And it applies to everyone here.
You should read the Allegory of the cave by Plato.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Compression of a material doesn't change it's mass. A pound of feathers compressed to half it's size is still a pound of feathers, only it's volume in a defined space is smaller and it will still have the same inertial mass.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by Mikado
Compression of a material doesn't change it's mass. A pound of feathers compressed to half it's size is still a pound of feathers, only it's volume in a defined space is smaller and it will still have the same inertial mass.
That is correct and I never said or implied otherwise. The compression was simply to make room for more mass in the same volume of space (increasing the weight of the material in the space) which does not subject it to "more atmospheric pressure".
How about the compression of mass in a black hole...(grin)...sorry...going a bit off topic.
How about the compression of mass in a black hole...(grin)...sorry...going a bit off topic.
Now, in comparison, take a deep mine shaft of say 2,000 meters. Drop that 10Kg mass. Does it fall? Yes. Now the argument that the OP will make is that there is a mass, the earth, at the bottom of the shaft and this is the attraction of mass.
Originally posted by spy66
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Maybe you can tell me what exact force that is pulling the 10kg mass down.
Gravity. Remove the vacuum tunnel from the equation for a moment. Place the mass on the ground. Where does the mass go? It's not flying away just because the vacuum tunnel is gone, right? It stays on the ground, why? What is keeping it on the ground? If you think it's something other than gravity say so now. If you agree it's gravity holding it down then add the vacuum tunnel now. The same gravity is still there but the ground has been replaced by the vacuum tunnel enabling the mass to fall. This doesn't change the gravity pulling the mass down, you've only removed the earth that was supporting the mass. Are you with me so far?
Well if we remove the vacuum tunnel. It is the atmosphere that keeps the 10kg to the ground.
The atmosphere that keeps the 10kg mass down comes from particles/gasses produced from earths solids,water and plants. Earths mass in it self doesn't keep the 10kg mass on the ground.
If earth didn't have a atmosphere. Earth's center wouldn't read much pressure/mass. because there wouldn't be a force pushing the top layers down to the center.edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by renegadeloser
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Moduli
Although Gravity has been defined as the Weak Force...and you have provided a definition as to what constitutes a Force...Gravity is described as such because we simply do not have the proper vocabulary for it's TRUE DESCRIPTION.
You state that Gravity is a Force because a Force is described as anything that provides a Change in Momentum. Well then by all means...explain what Momentum is being changed as LIGHT or PHOTONS travel the Space/Time Curvature into a Black Hole?
Where is your CHANGE IN MOMENTUM? Split Infinity
A force is not, in fact, defined as something which causes a change in momentum. A force is defined as something which causes a change in velocity (velocity has direction, momentum does not). The lights direction has changed, thus it's velocity has changed. Therefore, from our perspective, gravity is a force. (A 4 or 5 dimensional being that exists outside our "space" would not perceive it that way. But we are not that, we are 3 dimensional beings within our "space, thus we perceive it as a force)