It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Although I am not the one who presented the definition of what a FORCE is defined as...in the case of Gravity...a Photon that is traveling along the Space/Time Curvature created by a Black Hole...is NOT changing that Photons velocity. Rather the Photon is remaining constant in it's velocity and the change of direction of travel is not really a change of action of the Photon but rather a change of the Geometry of the surrounding Space/Time.
This is the reasoning behind showing that GRAVITY is not a true Force...it is the EFFECT CAUSED BY THE ALTERATION OF THE SPACE/TIME GEOMETRY and this alteration is caused by any amount of Mass but is easily shown to us as an EFFECT when we look at what happens to both Matter and Energy once captured by a large celestial body or this Celestial Bodies Gravitational EFFECT. Split Infinity
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Moduli
Although Gravity has been defined as the Weak Force...and you have provided a definition as to what constitutes a Force...Gravity is described as such because we simply do not have the proper vocabulary for it's TRUE DESCRIPTION.
You state that Gravity is a Force because a Force is described as anything that provides a Change in Momentum. Well then by all means...explain what Momentum is being changed as LIGHT or PHOTONS travel the Space/Time Curvature into a Black Hole?
Where is your CHANGE IN MOMENTUM? Split Infinity
Your replying in a illogical manner as Photons do not have momentum. Split Infinity
So you see that it IS A FORCE!
...this is like pulling teeth....
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Sweetie? WOW! I did not know you were so....emotional. LOL! I do not understand why you persist to make this such an emotional and personal debate as that is all this is...a debate.
Whether you believe I am right or wrong does not call for you to behave as you are...that being...very personal and emotionally driven as to the way you reply. This is not a complimentary way to achieve any understanding of what any party on this board may state.
I would and I believe many others also would appreciate a much greater amount of restraint in how you respond to issues that you may or may not agree with.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
The SOHO should have traveled faster then earths is orbeting the sun.
Why? I know what you mean when you say it should orbit faster but why should it?
I'm trying to understand you.
Because SOHO is between earth and the sun. SOHO's orbit radius around the sun is shorter than the orbit radius of earth around the sun. That is why SOHO should have traveled faster than earth around the sun.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Because SOHO is between earth and the sun. SOHO's orbit radius around the sun is shorter than the orbit radius of earth around the sun. That is why SOHO should have traveled faster than earth around the sun.
You have to understand that I have no idea WHAT YOU BELIEVE about these things.
Why do Earth and SOHO even orbit the Sun in the first place? Why do they move at all?
SOHO is not orbiting the Sun. It is orbiting the L1 point between the Earth and Sun.
Why isn't SOHO being pulled towards the sun? It is orbiting at a slower speed than it should do. But SOHO and earth both use 365 days around the sun?
This means that SOHO travels in some kind of gravity field between earth and the sun. Can you explain this gravity field?
This means that SOHO travels in some kind of gravity field between earth and the sun. Can you explain this gravity field?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spy66
SOHO is not orbiting the Sun. It is orbiting the L1 point between the Earth and Sun.
Why isn't SOHO being pulled towards the sun? It is orbiting at a slower speed than it should do. But SOHO and earth both use 365 days around the sun?
This means that SOHO travels in some kind of gravity field between earth and the sun. Can you explain this gravity field?
No. It is not "some sort of gravity field". The L1 point is a region where the gravitational forces of the two bodies are balanced with the angular momentum of an object located there.
I'm curious how this relates to your notions about gravity not being a force of attraction between masses.
edit on 11/2/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
What source would that be?
You should read your source again.
It's called a halo (not hollow) orbit but yes, the orbit around the L1 point enables SOHO to remain between the Sun and Earth.
There is a reason why SOHO must have a hallow orbit at L1. So that it can orbit with earth around the sun. With some compensation from time to time by SOHO.
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by spy66
What source would that be?
You should read your source again.
It's called a halo (not hollow) orbit but yes, the orbit around the L1 point enables SOHO to remain between the Sun and Earth.
There is a reason why SOHO must have a hallow orbit at L1. So that it can orbit with earth around the sun. With some compensation from time to time by SOHO.
How does it relate to your ideas about gravity not being a force of attraction between masses?
edit on 11/2/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)
I am saying what it is on my terms.
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
I am saying what it is on my terms.
No you're not. What do you think gravity is? SAY IT ALREADY!
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by spy66
Atmospheric pressure? Only?