posted on Nov, 26 2012 @ 01:20 AM
reply to post by jadedANDcynical
some days better than others and thanks for asking.
yeah, i'm still floating around, glad you noticed
wow. that's an interesting link, thanks
question - it's dated from Oct, is there a more recent briefing available ?
say, did you happen to notice that the bubbling areas are concentrated S of the sinkhole and so are the Deep Formations ?
to me, that is surprising as i would think the swamp areas would show effects first.
(path of least resistance and all)
i'm so not impressed that the diagrams (purposely?) fail to clearly identify the aquifer location
( like everyone knows what "alluvial" means
ok, with this conceptual graph, i have a question.
as i wasn't aware of the Big Hum prior to reading about in enenews, based on the graph (alone), are they surmising that it is contributing to the
gas/oil slick on the surface of the sinkhole ?
ETA -- regarding the seismos, a better question for those at Quake would be their placement addresses so we can view them too
... i don't know
how to pinpoint them but i know some Quake members do.
edit on 26-11-2012 by Honor93 because: ETA