It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr Peter Dow
US ambassador 'killed in Libya'.
US consulate Benghazi stormed.
4 US officials "dead"
BBC: US ambassador 'killed in Libya'
The US ambassador to Libya has died after being attacked by militiamen storming the US consulate in the eastern city of Benghazi, reports say.
I am shocked and horrified at this if it is confirmed and my sincere condolences to our American friends and loved ones.
This incident confirms my concerns that diplomatic missions in "war-on-terror" countries are not being properly secured by being located in properly secured and defended military bases.
This reminds me of the storming of a UN base in Mazar-e-Sharif when 7 UN workers were killed in April 2011. The guy responsible at the time for UN security - Gregory B. Starr, the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Safety and Security, is an American who used to be employed as the person responsible for the security of US diplomatic bases.
I have further concerns that the US & NATO countries' military these days lack the military knowledge and competence even to able to secure our military bases. Bases can't be properly secured in or near an urban area. You need a security zone of cleared and controlled ground of at least 6 miles, but 10 miles is better, around a military base to keep enemy fire from rockets and mortars out of range.
If you don't control the ground around a base this happens - 3 were killed at Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan yesterday.
Afghanistan Attacks: Insurgents Attack Bagram Air Base
KABUL, Afghanistan -- Afghan insurgents bombarded a U.S. base and destroyed a NATO helicopter, killing three Afghan intelligence employees, officials said Tuesday. There were also NATO personnel aboard and wounded, the coalition said without providing further details.
We've been at war in Afghanistan for nearly 11 years now and still the US and NATO military are operating out of insecure bases! Our supply routes in Afghanistan have never been secured and recently a decision by NATO-ISAF (commanded by a US general) was taken to close bases along the main highways in Afghanistan making the roads even more insecure.
The military and security leaders we are depending on to keep our personnel safe during this war on terror are incompetent and our diplomats would be well advised to have no faith in them. If I was a diplomat in a country with security problems I would quit and come home until we get proper military and security people in charge.
So there is a pattern here of incompetence at the very highest levels of leadership in the United States, NATO and the United Nations.
The people in charge are incompetent and this is very serious folks. We need urgent action to get competent people in post. We need a shake up at the highest levels of government on the military and security side especially. This can't be allowed to go on.
Check out my AfPak military strategy blog -
Afghanistan – Pakistan (AfPak) military strategy and the war on terroredit on 12-9-2012 by Mr Peter Dow because: (no reason given)
shake up at the highest levels of government
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by OneisOne
FYI.....
President Obama will "address the situation in Libya" at 10:35am EST.
And apparently Hillary Clinton will be there too.
Im watching Romneys speech now and all I can say he needs to shut the hell up. As I said I dont care for Obama but Romney's use of certain words is sending an opposite message that the President is sending.
Its so completely inappropriate and deadly and I dont think he is understanding that.
He essentially just told those who wish to do harm to the US to do it now while Obama is still in office because once Romney gets elected (if he does) things will change.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Golf66
Of course Obama should be criticized...
However there is a time and place for everything. You dont criticise the President in a situation like this in the manner Romney did.
No, but he should remain quiet long enough for the current president to handle the situation. Maybe at least 72 hours.Another good move might have been to offer support to the current leader in a time of crises, instead of attempting to make political gains right after the event happened.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Golf66
Of course Obama should be criticized...
However there is a time and place for everything. You dont criticise the President in a situation like this in the manner Romney did.
So.....of course Obama should be criticized.....but not when it does political damage to Obama.
Mitt Romney should keep quiet until after the election in November ???
Originally posted by TinfoilTP
This is an act of War.
Plain and simple, no two ways about it. A US ambassador has been murdered during an attack on a US embassy.
It's time to send in the marines, and not 50 of them. Obama is looking like a coward for only sending 50 of them and he will lose the election because of this.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by Golf66
Of course Obama should be criticized...
However there is a time and place for everything. You dont criticise the President in a situation like this in the manner Romney did.
Originally posted by Eurisko2012
So.....of course Obama should be criticized.....but not when it does political damage to Obama.
Mitt Romney should keep quiet until after the election in November ???
Originally posted by JValhalla
Any one watch the live feed and here the last question that a Reporter shouted.
Is this a act of war?