It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Foppezao
Originally posted by filosophia
Just to make sure everyone is on the same page, you are not allowed to 'wipe a country off the map' but you are allowed to 'send a country back to the stone age'...if you're Israel of course.
Well the Sharia law already brought them back to the stone age... ok middle age.
Why would they need all those electronics? they're not allowed to listen to music watch western movies and are constantly exposed to propaganda of their sickening religion through all sorts of (electronic) media..
I find it pretty plausible to usher an attack with EMP devices, and while ironic a high altitude burst also does the job.
I wonder what will happen with Hamas and Hezbollah when all communication and financial channels are cut off, would they finally die off?
Originally posted by jt327gir
as an alternative to EMP weapons, the carbon fiber weapons to disrupt the power grid long enough
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by jt327gir
as an alternative to EMP weapons, the carbon fiber weapons to disrupt the power grid long enough
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by cookiemonster32
So you negotiate all you want, but for me, nuke'em back to the dinosaurs......and we'll deal with the aftermath, you pussy
Are you really going to resort to name calling on this site where people can post views. I do not mean just yours, Apologies for that, but we are talking about politics and war stratagies here not weather someone is of the correct level of comprhension for your liking. Peace out. By the way I get your point though I beliave your talking about extremist.
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by jt327gir
as an alternative to EMP weapons, the carbon fiber weapons to disrupt the power grid long enough
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
but for me, nuke'em back to the dinosaurs......and we'll deal with the aftermath, you pussy
The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 was amended by the Symington Amendment (Section 669 of the FAA) in 1976. It banned U.S. economic, and military assistance, and export credits to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when they do not comply with IAEA regulations and inspections. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA). The Glenn Amendment (Section 670) was later adopted in 1977, and provided the same sanctions against countries that acquire or transfer nuclear reprocessing technology or explode or transfer a nuclear device. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).
Originally posted by BewilderedandAmused
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by jt327gir
as an alternative to EMP weapons, the carbon fiber weapons to disrupt the power grid long enough
Originally posted by BewilderedandAmused
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by cookiemonster32
So you negotiate all you want, but for me, nuke'em back to the dinosaurs......and we'll deal with the aftermath, you pussy
Are you really going to resort to name calling on this site where people can post views. I do not mean just yours, Apologies for that, but we are talking about politics and war stratagies here not weather someone is of the correct level of comprhension for your liking. Peace out. By the way I get your point though I beliave your talking about extremist.
Sorry, I got irritated.edit on 9/11/2012 by Yosemite Sam because: Apparently you now get fined for sayin pussy.
Originally posted by BewilderedandAmused
All I know is that Canada pulled out the people working at the embassy and sent all the Iranian embassy people back home that were living here. Friday I believe this was done. The Prime Minister might just have some inside information to pull such a drastic measure so quickly without anything on the news till it was over. The CBC news story implies this very thing (www.cbc.ca...)
It appears there will be a strike at which point is unknown except at the top Political Levels and the only way to stop it is if Iran backs down a little and realizes it must go into peace talks with one of the striking Nations even if it can't speak to Israel itself, another country could be used to buffer and then usher in peace talks.
Highly unlikely though! The People of Iran elected the man and unfortunately they will suffer the outcome. I don't believe Iran has an impeachment process. I feel for the people who really felt they were getting a new relief from the old regime that was there. Remember that?
Originally posted by Lysergic
Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
but for me, nuke'em back to the dinosaurs......and we'll deal with the aftermath, you pussy
I feel sorry for you if you honestly believe that, who is this we? Do you have a govt in your pocket?
Just another armchair fantasy-quaterbacking chump. Yes... Lets usher in a nuclear war is your logic?
Again I feel sorry for you if you honestly stand by what you type.
Originally posted by astrafax
Hi People this thread is fun.
Just a couple of points. An EMP blast will only affect the civilian systems as has been stated the iranian's have hardened there military systems to an EMP, once again israel goes after the civillian infrastructure on a grand scale war crime anyone.
As soon as israel uses a nuclear weapon it will be cut of from any support from the USA unless US repeal's the Symington Amendment to which israel has broke almost every rule and shouldn't be receiving any money or military support at all from the USA.
The Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 was amended by the Symington Amendment (Section 669 of the FAA) in 1976. It banned U.S. economic, and military assistance, and export credits to countries that deliver or receive, acquire or transfer nuclear enrichment technology when they do not comply with IAEA regulations and inspections. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 101 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA). The Glenn Amendment (Section 670) was later adopted in 1977, and provided the same sanctions against countries that acquire or transfer nuclear reprocessing technology or explode or transfer a nuclear device. This provision, as amended, is now contained in Section 102 of the Arms Export Control Act (AECA).
Many people supporting israel here are using words supposedly uttered by people in power in iran as a reason for attacking said country, with all the vitriol and hate for anything non jewish emanating from people in power in israel, And most especially with the SAMPSON option of destruction to everything within israels reach i would say that such a threat coming from a country that has nuclear weapons and the method of delivering said weapons and given that the leadership at the moment is arguably totally insane, should we not perceive them as the greatest danger in the world at the moment?
Originally posted by Lysergic
reply to post by Yosemite Sam
Graphite bomb over a nuclear one, that's a better option for a start.
No need to use nuclear weapons. Not very Messianic, I know.
. I know you're waiting for Armaggedon and all, but some of us aren't subscribing to it.
non sense... that is what U talking.
can i have question? jews come from africa, right? run from pharaoh, right? how come that today jews(zionists) are white people? no way white man and white people from africa? it looks like someone steal not only the land, but religion to....
lie after lie from those so coled jews...