Originally posted by Yosemite Sam
Originally posted by Vatikakie
Do anyone on this site think for a second Russia or maybe china will allow a nuke to explode anywhere outside Israeli space. That thing will start a
chain reaction way bigger than we want to acknowlege. And if anyone here is naive enough to believe Israel will be allowed to use a nuke in whatever
way without being attacked by the same means is living in Lala land.
This post is on point, and what I've tried to avoid in all my previous posts.
My personal belief is that they both will tolerate a nuclear attack on Iran as long as it's limited and assuming the US has a minor or less role. I
think the problem then comes with a chem/bio attack from Syria on Israel in defense of Iran. In my opinion, they would be forced to nuke Damascus,
and perhaps Allepo. Once this happens all bets are off. My greatest fear is that Obama will be in office. He hasn't been able to even negotiate
with his left sock. Once Damascus is hit, I believe Putin has no choice but to take out Televiv and Jeruselum.
Once the temple mount is melted you better kiss the ones you love and say goodbye. Obama's no Kennedy. He doesn't have the brains, stature, or grits
to save us. All he's concerned about is himself. I'm really not trying to be political, but I believe the only one that has a chance of saving the
north half of the world is Romney.
Short of that (negotiated settlement), I'm not sure what happens. It seems as of now China has sufficient contracts in place that it sees no value
add in becoming involved.
And Russia has even more of some resources then the US; as well as the pipelines to the west. However, they might be motivated by what now seems
control of Iran and ESPECIALLY Syria. This on top of Iraq, Afghanistan, to mention a few. But, I still don't see this as enough from them to launch
an ICBM. I think the one thing that would bring them in is if we get directly involved in the assualt on Iran and again ESPECIALLY Syria.
Syria is the lynchpin. Russia views it as thier one stronghold in the middle east. And above all else, I believe they would be willing to fight for
i, perhaps at all cost.
So you are saying it's OK for israel to nuke 70 million people because it's believed they might at some point try and build a ( singular eg one of 1 )
bomb, that is nuts. israel firsters are busily trying to equate Zionist regime with the whole of israel and every jew that they say Iran wants to wipe
off of the earth, the one fly in that ointment is the Jewish population of Iran second only to israel in the middle east, how come they are still
alive, wouldn't they be the first to go. They like living there so much that they refused bribes by israel to leave
China gets over half of it's oil from Iran and is developing the fields in the south of iran, i'm sure that if israel were to nuke those fields china
would be extremely pissed off.
AS for Syria China and Russia saw what happened to Libya with it's so called humanitarian mission by NATO and the thousands of civilians killed by
NATO, NATO claimed that they didn't kill a single civilian by the expediency of marking everyone killed as a terrorist be it man women or child.
Gaddafi was generally loved by his people, when he was finally caught the people defending him were old women as all the young men had been killed, a
hated dictator doesn't inspire old women to take up arms and defend him. Libya is a hellhole now and Russia and China don't want to see Syria end up
like that, no matter how bad it is now it can get worse.
And isn't it Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria that comprise most of the free Syrian army, shouldn't America be fighting with Assad against Al-Qaeda
terrorists in Syria.
So you have the absurd situation where in Afghanistan it's Al-Qaeda insurgents that American troops are fighting yet in Syria America is supporting
edit on 11-9-2012 by astrafax because: more stuff