Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

UNPARTIAL.com is NOT unpartial ~!! PERIOD!

page: 1
5

log in

join

posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 02:18 AM
link   
why does unpartial.com ...

NOT have the face of Ron Paul who is running ALSO for president?? !~~!
RONPAUL2012.com I FULLY expected to see his face up there as well.. so lets be fair..

Unless they FIX it.. the elections are ALREADY fixed~! It's complete BS and mass propaganda that there's only 2 to choose from .. I guess we NOW know where the 2million went to~!

and I don't VOTE for this very reason ~!!

edit on 4-9-2012 by Komodo because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2012 by Komodo because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 02:38 AM
link   
That's an astute observation... Is he not anywhere?



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 02:57 AM
link   

Originally posted by Komodo
NOT have the face of Ron Paul


Do ypu meaan the 2 faces on this page, with Obama on the left? if you do then Ron Paul is in between them,, under the text.



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 02:58 AM
link   
As far as I know Ron Paul isn't on a ticket?

Did he announce somewhere that he was going to be on a third party ticket?

If not then your argument is moot.
edit on 4-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:00 AM
link   
They cant put up Ron Paul face !
the third party hasnt been activated yet
need to keep it low for the moment



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Grimpachi
As far as I know Ron Paul isn't on a ticket?

Did he announce somewhere that he was going to be on a third party ticket?

If not then your argument is moot.
edit on 4-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



Exactly.

When will these Paul people quit?



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:03 AM
link   
reply to post by Komodo
 


He pulled out in May dude.

The dream's over man...



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:07 AM
link   
If anything they should have Gary Johnson in there at least he is running.

If they did put Ron Paul up there it would show bias to someone that isn't even in the race.
edit on 4-9-2012 by Grimpachi because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:10 AM
link   
Third party?

Erm...

1. Barack Obama - Democrat
2. Mitt Romney - Republican
3. Gary Johnson - Libertarian
4. Jill Stein - Green

I count 4 parties.

Am I missing something here or are there a few members here who have no idea about their own election system?

edit on 4-9-2012 by AlphaHawk because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:12 AM
link   

Originally posted by Komodo
Unless they FIX it.. the elections are ALREADY fixed~!

Unless the newly created site "unpartial.com" does not add a picture of a possible candidate (I don't know if he is, as there's no party behind him), the elections are already fixed?

You cannot be serious?



It's complete BS and mass propaganda that there's only 2 to choose from ..

You do realize that it's your own fault?
There are more than only two to "choose from". But because of you, the people, you haven't been interested in any other parties.
It is personally your own fault that there are only two "realistic" candidates because you haven't chosen to support the others or run for president yourself.
It is personally your own fault if you think that there is not a better party out there. If you think this way, maybe you should, for the sake of democracy, start that party?



and I don't VOTE for this very reason ~!!

Wow. First you are angry that there are only two candidates (which is not true), and then you give them all the power by not voting for someone else. Now it's even more your own fault.
edit on 4-9-2012 by Consequence because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:16 AM
link   
reply to post by AlphaHawk
 


They do not. One would think that on a site where a million threads are created about the same thing, some would focus on the alternatives. Instead, these are ignored and people get angry when a specific party excludes a person that does not fit into their party. They don't seem to understand the concept of a "party".



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:21 AM
link   
reply to post by Consequence
 


Star for pointing out that last part.


As you can see here are other parties they just never get much support.

As far as the last point you made it shows that maybe not everyone is intellecually equipped to vote.



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 03:48 AM
link   
Am I the only one who thinks it's funny that OP posts a clearly biased thread on how Unpartial is so biased?

Please tell me I'm not the only one who sees the irony here...
edit on 4-9-2012 by AfterInfinity because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 04:01 AM
link   
reply to post by AfterInfinity
 


I dunno Alanis. Do we know what irony is? Would be ironic if you used the word wrong.



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 04:41 AM
link   
reply to post by Consequence
 


stop with the BS~!

then UPARTIAL.COM NEEDS to put ALL the faces up ..

it's that simple..

yes

or

no !



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 04:44 AM
link   

Originally posted by AlphaHawk
reply to post by Komodo
 


He pulled out in May dude.

The dream's over man...


according to his website ..

he hasn't .. no where on the does he say he did.. front page man.. dream is still alive~!



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 05:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by Komodo
why does unpartial.com ...

NOT have the face of Ron Paul who is running ALSO for president?? !~~!
RONPAUL2012.com I FULLY expected to see his face up there as well.. so lets be fair..

Unless they FIX it.. the elections are ALREADY fixed~! It's complete BS and mass propaganda that there's only 2 to choose from .. I guess we NOW know where the 2million went to~!

and I don't VOTE for this very reason ~!!

edit on 4-9-2012 by Komodo because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-9-2012 by Komodo because: (no reason given)


Yes this totally independent site is clear proof that the election is rigged!



posted on Sep, 4 2012 @ 05:32 AM
link   
You may have missed my point all together.



posted on Sep, 5 2012 @ 04:46 PM
link   
post removed for serious violation of ATS Terms & Conditions



posted on Sep, 6 2012 @ 01:00 AM
link   
Because, they have to advertise "unpartial" in the middle. To get main stream acceptance they have to appear balanced, the only way to do that is to have an R on one side and a D on the other-forget the rest they don't lead to clicks and money. "Fair and balanced" like fox









 
5

log in

join