It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bigcountry08
This is not true, it is a scientific fact that men are stronger than women. If you take a man who is the same weight as a women, the man will be stronger than her because the male body carries more muscle mass, and we carry more slow twitch muscle fiber where as women carry more fast twitch.
Originally posted by Biliverdin
Originally posted by DARREN1976
On a different note, another thing that really cracks me up with feminists, real radical ones I'm talking about here, is that they say they are equal to or better than men in all aspects, they want equal rights etc. which I have no problem with, is that when it comes to moving a wardrobe or something heavy, they get you to move and say "oh, but your a man, your stronger than me, you move it!" so much for equal rights then eh? (I apologise to any women that this may of offended, but thats just the way it is, I'm being real here)
Ever think that they may be trying to make you feel valued and useful?
Those jars though...definately need a man's hands for those, although, push comes to shove, I could always invest in a gadget that does the job just as well. But then why have long eyelashes, if not to be able to flutter them once in a blue moon when I fancy a pickled onion
Originally posted by Suspiria
If I had to live in a world full of hormonal women and no men....OH GOD THE HORROR!!!!!!!!!
I'd be rounded up as a traitor to womankind, forced into a barbie pink cell to watch TOWIE on loop until I begged for mercy, daubed in orange fake tan and forced into slave labour chatting vapid # while cutting sexually frustrated bitches cuticles.
Shoot me now......
Genetic Maker of Men Is Diminished but Holding Its Ground, Researchers Say
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: February 22, 2012 81 Comments
Men, or at least male biologists, have long been alarmed that their tiny Y chromosome, once the same size as its buxom partner, the X, will continue to wither away until it simply vanishes. The male sex would then become extinct, they fear, leaving women to invent some virgin-birth method of reproduction and propagate a sexless species.
The fear is not without serious basis: The Y and X chromosomes once shared some 800 genes in common, but now, after shedding genes furiously, the Y carries just 19 of its ancestral genes, as well as the male-determining gene that is its raison d’être. So much DNA has been lost that the chromosome is a fraction of its original size.
Originally posted by POPtheKlEEN89
one day...
one day all women will outweigh the men, and demand taxes from their household men in the form of SNU-SNU, if we refuse, they tie us to a tree starving us for a week, breaking toe after toe until we get on our backs with appendages in the air shaking like a beaten chihuahua.
Originally posted by SoulSearching8
www.nytimes.com...
I am not sure how to link yet, but here is an interesting article on the male Y. I'll copy and paste.
Genetic Maker of Men Is Diminished but Holding Its Ground, Researchers Say
By NICHOLAS WADE
Published: February 22, 2012 81 Comments
Men, or at least male biologists, have long been alarmed that their tiny Y chromosome, once the same size as its buxom partner, the X, will continue to wither away until it simply vanishes. The male sex would then become extinct, they fear, leaving women to invent some virgin-birth method of reproduction and propagate a sexless species.
Originally posted by Skywatcher2011
reply to post by SLAYER69
Not enough sources and evidence to prove the case of Men becoming obsolete. Failed thread.