Hundreds of tanks and armor moving in California, Burbank, page 3


Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 7 times


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 10:23 AM by 46ACE
Originally posted by pointr97
reply to
post by 46ACE



Nope, sorry, way different vehicles, we do not drive tracked vehicles on civilian roads without a really really good reason, the M1117 is a light wheeled vehicle with armor and light weaponry, not the tracks we are seeing on the rail lines......I'm sorry, i'm all for a good story, but this is nothing more than a regiment or brigade moving out of NTC from training, could be the only line to get 1st or 3rd Cav back to Hood, 2nd back to Polk, any number of reserve units, or most likely 4th back to Riley KS.....Let us use logic, there is not a single unit in california with jungle camo, not a one. Nothing coming back from over seas has jungle camo. These are units that are coming off a temporary duty assignment. And as a previous ops officer, I sure would find closer units from the midwest to roll down the streets of Wisconsin than a unit from cali AND having to repaint them. Just too much effort, especially when you have riley due south.

Actually, you have three light cav units closer, Lewis, Riley, and Knox....all of which have appropriate camo and are closer.


Thanks for the knowledgeable input; I'm a "zoomie": don't know nuthin 'bout conus Army posts or armor.I was mostly pointing out these movements are not just from months or years ago, but documented today( yesterday).Cheers!
edit on 7-8-2012 by pointr97 because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-8-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-8-2012 by 46ACE because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 12:26 PM by SonsOfTheMeek
Originally posted by Vasa Croe
Originally posted by Amanda5
reply to
post by Vasa Croe



You use the word - this - implying singular of the video. There are two videos attached to the post - are you referring to both or just one? Thank you.

Much Peace...



Was referring to the first one as the OP stated he had seen the second. The first has been posted here a while ago as well....can't find it in search though so will check on it through image/video search in the a.m. when I am up again.



I think you're confusing that video with another one. The first video was recorded on the 6th, a couple days ago. It says so in the desciption.


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 12:41 PM by lonewolf19792000
reply to post by repeatoffender



Just take a look at the paint on the heavy armor, they are not going to the M.E., but they could just be going to resupply bases who have sent heavy armor to the M.E., but that camo paint...whispers of martial law...military urban excersices, tanks in St. Louis, gunships and blackhawks over Little Rock. Yeah it's starting to scream martial law. Idunno if it's because of 12-21-12 or some other reason, but it appears that is what is being lined up is martial law.


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 02:23 PM by caf1550
reply to post by repeatoffender



You realize that this is how they transfer a armored battalion or division because there not going to drive Abrams and Bradleys down a street in the US


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 02:30 PM by Phage
reply to post by SonsOfTheMeek



The first video was recorded on the 6th, a couple days ago. It says so in the desciption.

And of course a youtube poster would never lie.


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 02:42 PM by xXxinfidelxXx
reply to post by CaptainBeno



They look like they are all sporting fresh paint jobs so I figure that they are coming back from refurbishing at the factory.

EDIT: BTW those are M2 Bradley IFVs (Infantry Fighting Vehicle), not tanks. It's basically like an APC with a 20mm cannon sitting in a turret on top of it. The funny thing is, during OIF, it was found that it was way too top-heavy to be used in rough terrain, so now they pretty much just use them in urban environments. Even in urban environments, though, they are very sluggish and not very maneuverable. Take from that what you will. To be honest, short of it being a cost-saving venture, I don't even know why they still use Bradleys. They're pretty much only good as semi-mobile weapons platforms. I suppose they would be good for checkpoint duty though, now that I think about it.
edit on 8/8/2012 by xXxinfidelxXx because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 04:12 PM by calebdaniels
Weird timing. There's this forum post stating that the guy's Coast Guard friend was leaving on a "Top Secret" mission for a month. This tank moving thing is interesting. ATS Post

Can't help but attempt to draw a line between the moving of tanks and the multiple earthquakes that happened in Southern California today.
edit on 8-8-2012 by calebdaniels because: Added link the the aforementioned post.



reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 04:15 PM by tluna1
reply to post by pacifier2012



Well they are not painted with grafiti or gang signs in order to blend in with urban areas so i think we are all ok.


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 08:03 PM by Amanda5
reply to post by EyesWideShut



Great response - thank you. I even worked out some of the acronyms without using a reference for help. I don't teach advanced mathematics and I'm not showing my ignorance towards RIMPAC. Ignorance states I am ignoring the facts/evidence/information before me. I had been unaware of RIMPAC - thanks to you as my Teacher I am now aware.

I have some questions for you. The thread is about army tanks - with one video showing army tanks in Burbank California - multiple(or at least what appeared to be at least a hundred) of them. Are there any tanks utilised in RIMPAC? If you've referred to them with an acronym - then I haven't worked it out. How do the army tanks get from Hawaii and American soil and how long does it take?

The information being discussed within this thread is trying to ascertain why the army tanks were being transported - to where and from where and why??? I am a curious Soul.

Much Peace...


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 08:07 PM by Amanda5
reply to post by Phage



I'd like to respond to your post. I viewed the Burbank video on another site yesterday and for all intents and purposes it appears to be the real deal - why - because it has the vocal intact complete with swearing and emotion being conveyed through first hand comments and remarks.

I have viewed the same video elsewhere, afterwards, with music dubbed over the entire clip with no human voice audible. To me the original is more likely to have no editing. Just my thoughts in a world where discerning the truth from the lies gets more intriguing everyday.

Much Peace...


reply posted on 8-8-2012 @ 08:37 PM by Phage
reply to post by Amanda5


Thank you for responding but I'm not sure you understood my point. I am quite sure those are real tanks on a real train. All I was saying is that, just because the description of a youtube video has a certain date, it doesn't mean that it is the actual date. I don't automatically believe everything I see on youtube.

Perhaps the date is correct, perhaps not but I really don't find anything particularly alarming about it and it's not the first time it's happened.
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

edit on 8/8/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Pages: <<  1    2    3    4  >>    ^^TOP^^



Norway To Open Century Old Package
  Posted 19 days ago with 127 member flags
Blame The Real Bad Guys - The Powers Behind Super Powers
  Posted 18 days ago with 65 member flags
19 Yr Old Hostage Gunned Down By Police While Escaping Captor
  Posted 8 days ago with 53 member flags
DHS Source: “It’s going hot”
  Posted 14 days ago with 49 member flags
Police Shoot Another 911 Caller In Her Own Backyard
  Posted 19 days ago with 46 member flags
The Oatmeal\'s Tesla Fundraiser Pushes Past $1.1M
  Posted 15 days ago with 44 member flags