It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
How can you be so certain that it was intended to represent the actual size and colors of the nose and eyes?
Originally posted by HumanCondition
Why were the eyes always so disproportionate to the face and nose?
Why not draw the mouth? There has never been a wandjina found with a mouth.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
Firstly, these painting are not 50,000 years old. You can't carbon date paintings that far.
Secondly, whose to say they are Aliens? It is known a white civilization arrived here long before the Aboriginal people as there was of a similar civilization before the Mori Ori of NZ.
Originally posted by mainidh
You'd also think, at least I do, that if ancient aliens were visiting Aborigines 50,000 years ago, they would not still to this day be one of the most primitive tribal people on the planet. Unless the biggest technological advancement the aliens had was a bent stick.
Originally posted by greyer
reply to post by HumanCondition
Hey, I would consider that the art images are disinformation. I found a picture of the original and they appear to have 4 fingers, it is a fact that aliens have 4 fingers so that would increase the chance of ancient aliens being a reality.
Originally posted by nakiel
Originally posted by skepticconwatcher
They look like owls.
Spirits in the form of owls.
There are owls in the picture.
Yep, radiant owl masks and body-paint!
"Weaving spiders come not here"
So some cave paintings with people having large eyes and a large head is hard evidence of e.t life? Don't be easily fooled and naive. There is no proof at all of e.t life. None at all.