It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by flyswatter
Hawaii stated his BC is there, and is valid. They are the authority on this, and no, we cant see it.
And they still refuse to go on official record and say this under oath.
This one little act, which in all honesty is completely trivial if they have nothing to hide, would clear up this entire drama.
PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE.
It doesn't exist and the entire reason that a summary judgement is given is to end frivolous lawsuits that are as ridiculous as YOU claim the lawsuits questioning his legitimacy are.
It's soooooo easy.
Prima facie means on the face.
It is evidence so blatantly obvious that a judgement is rendered without a freaking trial.
No one can explain this.
No one.
The best you deathers can do is sling insults and point to Hawaiian officials who are doing everything possible to convince people that he is legit, but without doing the one thing that would prove beyond any doubt that he is legit.
Whatever.
Sad and weak.edit on 22/7/2012 by kyviecaldges because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by spoor
BECAUSE BY INSINUATING OBAMA HAS A BIRTH CERTIFICATE; YOU ARE INSINUATING HE IS A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!!!!
Can you really be that dense or obtuse? You quite literally shot yourself in the face with that remark.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by habitforming
Except none of them have even been to court.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by habitforming
No. It needs to be looked into by We The People, who are the same People who hired him in the first place...
Originally posted by kyviecaldges
reply to post by habitforming
Birther lie.
Please show where any of them have refused to testify under oath.
Testifying under oath would satisfy this whole dilemma.
No one has done this.
Plenty of opportunity has been given.
PLENTY.
Difference is that I'm not pretending to explain why they wont do this or that. I dont have an explanation for everything, neither do you. Nobody does. What I said about this is factually correct - Hawaii said he was born there, and they said that his BC is valid. Be it pro-Obama or anti-Obama, those two things are not disputable.
I dont know how it would go down if they were in court. At this point, all I know is that they dont have to go to court with it if they choose not to, because there is no requirement for it.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by habitforming
Please let me refer you to this thread -> www.abovetopsecret.com...
I can see you have some catching up to do.
Show me where anyone refused to.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by habitforming
Show me a court case where the Hawaiian official who signed his birth certificate presented it.
Or else admit that you are lying.
I can rebut you all day; however unlike you I probably don't get paid to do it.
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by habitforming
So you are the only person allowed to say whether or not this deserves looking into? Way to get an ego..