Originally posted by seabhac-rua
reply to post by sidLives
I appreciate you civility.
Thank you. I think we can get along together and still have different opinions... No big deal.
However, if you think I am simply making up the fact that Jones has been caught lying then you are not a very well informed person, all I have to say
to that is 'Y2K'.
Maybe I'm really not well informed, that's why I appreciate a healthy exchange of arguments...
I'm sorry if I gave you a bad impression, I just wanted to get other points of view and less name calling stuff.
I honestly don't see the point of elaboration concerning Jones's dishonesty if you regard my efforts as "bashing".
Well, from where I come from, we usually don't call anybody a lier without backing it up... It is very insulting.
You are incorrect in you definition of apologist, an apologist is somebody who defends a cause or person etc. If this thread is supposedly questioning
Jones's motives etc, then an apologist is a person who will come on here and defend the man, his actions, his words, his ideas and his
Actually, I'm also sorry if I used "APOLOGY" as root for apologist...
"apology (plural apologies)
An expression of remorse or regret for having said or done something that harmed another: an instance of apologizing (saying that one is sorry).
EX: What he said really hurt my feelings, but his apology sounded so sincere that I couldn't help but forgive him.
Ex: The CEO made a public apology for the scandal, and promised full cooperation with the authorities."
One of the reasons I'm here is to improve my English skills.
But I still don't get anything to defend anyone, I just don't understand why there are more people attacking (viciously) AJ than for instance the
big guys from CNN or FOX news... How many people lost ( a lot of) money, health, limbs and so on, on the advice of the "experts" on the MSM? Why
there are no threads about coke light, Corn Flakes, Banksters products financing the MSM news and so many on AJ's "orangine stuff"?
Well. I just try to see where is the COMMON SENSE here...
If you would like to discuss this post please do: www.abovetopsecret.com...
edit on 6-1-2013 by seabhac-rua because: (no reason given)
Exxon Valdez oil spill in Alaska? Was it harmless as the MSM wanted us to believe? Have you got wind of all settlements they had to pay to shut up
people? Or is it just his style that you does not like? Is Ventura the problem?
Is it because he retracted some of his stuff? Every news Medium does it from time to time (provided they have some character left).
I think you should post the link to what you are referring to, and try to present a more rational analyses of the facts...
It's very difficult to get what is your point, if you spin it that much... Maybe you should show the takes from whatever news network you consider
that did a good work as a contrast show case... Just to compare and get a better idea... Just saying...
The bottom line is simple, you go back to the year of 89, to give an example of what AJ's work is ALL about and don't even bother to give us
(uninformed Joes and Janes) the original stuff (link) you are referring to?
Don't take me wrong, but it's a little bit lacking on substance, if you ask me...
I will gig a little bit more, but I'd be thankful if you could share more of your knowledge.