It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Former Head Of Star Wars Program Says Cheney

page: 8
67
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:07 PM
link   
reply to post by SimonPeter
 


Your research is flawed. Therefore, so is your post.




posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by SimonPeter
Cheney had Rumnsfeld issue a directive where by the White House would be contacted to ask permission before any fighter escorts would be dispatched . I can't believe that you never heard this . It was well known .


And that has something to do with Cheney ordered NORAD to stand-down on 9/11 how exactly?


Cheney had NORAD stood down and was running a war exercise with a complete Norad Radar system in front of him and saw everything that was going on real time but you must have done the research on it or maybe you didn't care enough . Just because you didn't care enough to research it doesn't mean it didn't happen . The exercise was what if terrorist fly jetliners into the WTC and Pentagon . You can access this report if you want . Norman Mineta attested before Congress that Dick Cheney was running war exercises at 9:00 am when he arrived at the BUNKER where all the radar screens were located . Dick denied it . Norman Mineta was the Secretary of Transportation .


Man, what you been smoking? That is the biggest load of bovine manure I've heard in a long time.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by vipertech0596
reply to post by trysts
 

Umm, we don't have anti-missile systems protecting government buildings now. What would make you think we had them back then?


Umm...it's logical to have anti-missile systems embedded in high-priority areas. It's also logical not to publish where these systems may be. I'm just using reason, since I live in a country whose government is far from transparent.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:20 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 



Man, what you been smoking? That is the biggest load of bovine manure I've heard in a long time.


Amen to that!

That's the biggest steamer I've seen posted in years.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:37 PM
link   
reply to post by 911files
 


Your Ignorance astounds me . I first heard the news report on where the president and vice president was located and what they were doing while the attack was in progress . Cheney was running war games but the news did not elaborate any further . Look up Norman Mineta's testimony to congress about where Cheney was . It's there . Before you call a man an idiot be sure you went to every length to prove him wrong .



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:44 PM
link   
reply to post by trysts
 




Umm...it's logical to have anti-missile systems embedded in high-priority areas.

That would make sense if you had a reasonable expectation of an attack from some airborne threat. We didn't and we don't.



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 10:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by trysts
 




Umm...it's logical to have anti-missile systems embedded in high-priority areas.

That would make sense if you had a reasonable expectation of an attack from some airborne threat. We didn't and we don't.


Oh yeah, I guess the NORAD drills for planes hitting buildings was totally unreasonable. I'm glad that never happened! lol



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 11:02 PM
link   
reply to post by trysts
 


The military has contingency plans for every thing conceivable . Any aircraft that big would have an escort very quickly especially in that sensitive area any time the ATC lost contact with it .



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 11:11 PM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by trysts
 


The military has contingency plans for every thing conceivable . Any aircraft that big would have an escort very quickly especially in that sensitive area any time the ATC lost contact with it .


Apparently, according to some people, guarding the Pentagon with at least surface-to-air missiles was inconceivable! I may trade in my apron and apply for Director of Pentagon Security! lol



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 11:39 PM
link   
reply to post by trysts
 

Do we have submarine nets and mines protecting our harbors? Isn't Russian a spy sub a gigher possibilty?



posted on Jun, 22 2012 @ 11:57 PM
link   

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by trysts
 

Do we have submarine nets and mines protecting our harbors? Isn't Russian a spy sub a gigher possibilty?




I don't know what a "gigher possibility" is? And yes, I already googled it. If your point is that America was not in danger from attack by foreign countries in 2001, then I agree. The attack was orchestrated by people within this government.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 12:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by Screwed
reply to post by Numbers33four
 


I do not presume to know but I do have a fertile imagination which allows me to see possibilities that others may not.

For all we know Cheney saved the planet by going along with this.

How?

Let your imagination run wild.
Don't let me have all the fun.

Sometimes the truth is truely stranger than fiction.



Oh dear...You mean Cheney...could be a....humanitarian? A man so full of love for his fellow humans
that he realizes a blood sacrifice must be made to save the lives of the rest of humanity...?

I've never thought of Cheney this way....as a Christ figure.

Usually I think of him as a man with an artificial heart who is really bad at shooting shotguns, but who knows?...

Hey, did you know that boiled water freezes faster than cold water?


edit on 23-6-2012 by rival because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 12:21 AM
link   

Originally posted by trysts

Originally posted by samkent
reply to post by trysts
 

Do we have submarine nets and mines protecting our harbors? Isn't Russian a spy sub a gigher possibilty?




I don't know what a "gigher possibility" is? And yes, I already googled it. If your point is that America was not in danger from attack by foreign countries in 2001, then I agree. The attack was orchestrated by people within this government.


"gigher" means "higher" in internet translation...fyi

This post made of think of something completely sinister--a nuclear torpedo type of device.

What a scary thought...they could be placed in all the major US harbors, and who would know?
How would we know...The damn thing wouldn't have to be bigger than a killer whale...

.Oooo, maybe I should have said "Orca" instead of killer whale



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 12:25 AM
link   

Originally posted by 911files

Originally posted by trysts
Excuse me. You asked for a link to what I stated. "The order still stands", clearly means there was a stand down order since the plane was not shot down.


No it doesn't. It clearly means "the order still stands". It could not possibly be the order he had just given to shoot down aircraft threatening the Capitol could it? You are presenting absolutely no evidence that the "order" referred to is a "stand down order". The plane was not shot down because it was already down.




Exactly



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 12:26 AM
link   
reply to post by thisisnotaname
 


Could you edit the title? It doesn't make sense.

Other, this topic has been posted already.

Not to take away from it. I've always suspected that Cheney had a bigger role in 9/11 than what has already been reported over the years.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 01:41 AM
link   

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by 911files
 


Your Ignorance astounds me .


Well, if you call a very good grasp of the timeline "ignorance", then thank you.


Originally posted by SimonPeter
I first heard the news report on where the president and vice president was located and what they were doing while the attack was in progress .


So you are basing your pile of bovine manure on a recall of something you heard 11 years ago?


Originally posted by SimonPeter
Cheney was running war games but the news did not elaborate any further .


No he was not, he was in his office.


Originally posted by SimonPeter
Look up Norman Mineta's testimony to congress about where Cheney was .


How would Mineta know? He was not there. By that same testimony, he did not arrive until the evac of the White House began. That began somewhere around 9:35. It was at that time that the Secret Service took him from his office to the "bunker". Scroll up, we have already discussed this in this very thread.


Originally posted by SimonPeter
It's there .


No its not.


Originally posted by SimonPeter
Before you call a man an idiot be sure you went to every length to prove him wrong .


I'll kept that in mind the next time I call someone an idiot. But since I did not call you an idiot then I just consider this you giving me some advice. Thanks, but I think I have it handled.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 01:50 AM
link   

Originally posted by Screwed
At this point it doesn't matter if the President of the God Damned United States of motherfriggin America gets on T.V. during the half time of the Super Bowl and declares that it WAS indeed an inside job. and Dick Cheney flips us all the bird and says "yeah, I did it, whatcha gonna do about it"?

The people who do not want to believe this NEVER WILL!!!!


Period!!!
End of story.


90% of the world population are stupid,
I mean..... really stupid.....

PEACE,
RK



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 01:51 AM
link   
exhibits a & b!





2nds line!



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 02:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by GiodanoBruno

What we all truthers or "people of common sense" must do is learn from 911 and train ourselves for the next false flag operation.


Train yourself to do what? Go on the internet and show off about how much cleverer you are than "commoners"? Because from where I'm sitting Truthers are the least active activism group in the history of everything.



posted on Jun, 23 2012 @ 03:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by TrickoftheShade\Because from where I'm sitting Truthers are the least active activism group in the history of everything.


I have to take exception with that characterization. Most of what is known and verified out there is due to the work of truthers. How much of your time, energy and money have you invested in gaining the documentation of 9/11? If you ask me the same question, I'll be happy to respond, but you really don't want to ask.



new topics

top topics



 
67
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join