posted on Jun, 26 2012 @ 04:17 PM
reply to post by thisisnotaname
Which is it truthers, we stood down and allowed it to happen or we did it? There is one woefully clear fact in this entire "debate" (using that term
quite loosely): the people that believe "we were in on it" at some level have an agenda against Dick Cheney and in most cases Bush himself. That is
the ONLY factual claim to be made here. Hatred of a politician. I dislike many of them - too many of them - but I HATE no one.
I don't doubt Cheney is probably an SOB but as I've remarked on the "the WT7 thread to end all threads" (which by the mere fact that this thread
is here obviously DIDN'T end all threads) you have way too many people that would need to be involved in something like this (yet no one comes
forward), the guy that made the video that shows the charges came forward announcing it was a hoax (he watermarked his video). He added a UFO to the
vid for good measure.
I love a good conspiracy. I believe Oswald did not act alone. Either did Sirhan Sirhan. I think some crop circles are not man-made. I had a UFO
encounter about 6 months ago. (Not saying it was ET - it was simply nothing I've seen that I think "could" be man-made.). I've looked at both
sides of the argument from an average joe perspective. I come away with the VERY STRONG belief that some people absolutely are filled with hate for
this country and they disguise that as religion. These people HAD money and power and executed several attacks against the west, one of them being
No one ever answers me on this one - what about the plane in Shanksburg? That was intended for the White House or the Capital. So the nefarious Cheney
was willing to take out people that close to him for some additional cash which he did not even need? OPEC still controls oil prices. I can do some
additional homework and rattle off several hundred facts when the truthers simply say I'm not looking close enough. No physical evidence, no
witnesses, nothing but the age of YouTube and CGI. That's it. Oh and that 'pull it' ONLY EVER means detonate. Couldn't ever in a gazillion years
mean pull the operation to attempt to save the building due to the mounting "loss of life" as Larry whatever his last name is said in the EXACT SAME
SENTENCE. That makes a butt-load of sense - "kill more people - too many have died already". This excuse might just be my fav - in no way could
someone being interviewed about a horrific incident (and possibly feeling duress) he was involved in and simply came up with a term that is ALSO used
in the demolition world.
Good grief. No wonder Charlie Brown never gets to kick the football.