It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by Peruvianmonk
The Falklands should return back to it's former owner Argentinia
Originally posted by NightFlyer96
People always talk about the islanders self determination, of course if theyre descended from Britain and Britain is the more powerful country they will want to be British. And what about the self determination of the Argentines that lived on the islands before the British invaded? it was definatley not respected by the British.
Originally posted by CrimsonKapital
I find this utterly confusing?
Australia has sacrificed hundreds of thousands of men in Britains wars, yet in WW2 when the Japanese were invading Australia Britain spat in our faces and sent us NO help.
Yet the Falklands have sacrificed no one for Britain yet when they are under attack the Britains come rushing to their aid???
FU Britain!!!!
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by CrimsonKapital
I find this utterly confusing?
Australia has sacrificed hundreds of thousands of men in Britains wars, yet in WW2 when the Japanese were invading Australia Britain spat in our faces and sent us NO help.
Except for Spitfires, Mosquito's, Beaufighters, the garrisons of Hong Kong & Singapore & Malaya, Force Z, (OK - those ones didn't work to well - but they were still there!), the Indian Ocean fleet, the forces in Burma tanks, rifles, anti-tank guns, artillery, replacing the Aussie contingent withdrawn from eth Mid-East??
Yet the Falklands have sacrificed no one for Britain yet when they are under attack the Britains come rushing to their aid???
Battle of het Falklands not ring a bell then? (the 1914 one, not the 1982 one)
Falkland Island defence forces? - 10 of whom were killed in British service??
FU Britain!!!!
Try denying ignorance next time, instead of exhibiting it
Australia has sacrificed hundreds of thousands of men in Britains wars,
yet in WW2 when the Japanese were invading Australia Britain spat in our faces and sent us NO help.
Yet the Falklands have sacrificed no one for Britain yet when they are under attack the Britains come rushing to their aid
Originally posted by CrimsonKapital
Britain abandoned Australia after the Fall of Singapore, they didn't care if we were enslaved or entirely exterminated, they only selfishly cared about themselves.
Us Australians had more men killed in WW1 than America!!!
Britain owed us and when they had the chance to repay the favour they spat in our faces and ran away to Britain...
Oh wow 10 Falklanders were killed? Comparing that to the amount of Australians kiled is an insult.!!!
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
For pity's sake, not this nonsense again.
Australia has sacrificed hundreds of thousands of men in Britains wars,
Yes, and the British people are eternally grateful for the friendship shown to them by Australia, New Zealand and Canada and for the sacrifice so many had to pay.
yet in WW2 when the Japanese were invading Australia Britain spat in our faces and sent us NO help.
The UK did not 'spit' in your faces - there was the little matter of The Battle Of Britain and The Blitz.
Britain was under direct attack and had absolutely no resources whatsoever.
The UK was having to buy used and outdated equipment and resources at exorbitant prices from the USA just to survive.
Yet the Falklands have sacrificed no one for Britain yet when they are under attack the Britains come rushing to their aid
The Falkland Islands are a Bitish Overseas Territory and are solely dependant on the UK for it's defence.
The UK itself was not under direct attack at the time of The Falklands War.
Australia is an independant country with it's own Armed Forces and as said previously the UK was under attack and involved in major conflict all over the world at the time.
In the highly unlikely event that Australia was ever faced with imminent invasion from a foreign nation or was threatened in any way then I hope the UK would offer immediate and unconditional support to Australia - let's hope we never find out.
But none of that is the issue here - this is about The Right To Self-Determination - surely something you support, don't you?
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
And you bleating on about the supposed UK abandonment of Australia is offensive. We did no such thing, considering we were pretty much under siege in the UK from 1940 until 1944, we still sent what we could to the Far East and had a huge army in SE Asia fighting the Japanese.
It was also pretty much agreed between the US and UK that they would take the lead in the Pacific Theatre and we dealt with the European/African theatres. Australia didn't get "invaded" or "slaughtered" at all.
Originally posted by Freeborn
reply to post by CrimsonKapital
More British civilians were killed by German bombing during The Blitz than the total amount of Australians who died during the whole of WWII - but I wouldn't dream of belittling their contribution.
Approximately 0.7% of The Falkland Island population paid the ultimate price - approximately 0.5% of the Australian population did the same.
And they all have our most heart felt respect and gratitude.edit on 12/6/12 by Freeborn because: (no reason given)