It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Masterjaden
I am personally not of a mind to accept creationism; however, I KNOW that what they teach in school about evolution is absolutely untrue. They do not teach it as a theory any more. They do not teach the real evidence behind it, they teach contrived bull#e that doesn't come anywhere close to the truth.
I wonder if they would be as confident to jump out a 12th floor window, to test the "just a theory" of gravity?
edit on 6-6-2012 by Cogito, Ergo Sum because: for the heck of it.
Originally posted by Masterjaden
The theory of gravity is NOT the theory of whether gravity exists or not, when you try to use this to parallel the theory of evolution, you showcase your lack of intelligent, logical thought.
The theory of gravity is an attempt to explain the observed phenomena of gravity, not to theorize its existence.
The theory of evolution is an attempt to theorize the origin of life and is not based on observable phenomena except in the most removed sense...
So please stop showcasing your lack of intelligence by comparing apples and oranges please because the theory of gravity and its cause has some major holes in it as well that requires almost as much circular logic and contrived formulae as the theory of evolution does.
Law of Gravity.
Law of Biogenesis.
Law of Thermodynamics
Theory of Evolution.
The difference between gravity and evolution is easy to understand by science's own definitions. No need to make fun of others, be kind and show respect to all.
God Bless,
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
Not all Christians are Creationists. It's not a pre-requisit to accepting the love of God in the person and spirit of Jesus Christ. Let's be clear about that much, because there's a lot of ignorance here, and bashing, on both sides.
It is a fact that 1 in 2 adults never reach the final stage of cognitive development. They are incapable of reaching original conclusions. Instead they believe what their trusted institutions tell them. Such institutions include family, government, and church
Ummm no. Laws are measurements, formulas or absolute facts that do not change. Theories DO NOT BECOME laws. The law of gravity explains the mathematical equation for gravity. The THEORY of gravity explains how it works, what causes it, and also includes the LAW of gravity. At least learn your scientific terminology before attempting to discredit a field of science you haven't even read the basics about. Theories aren't just made up because they sound good, they are based on processes that have been proven to exist, such as evolution.edit on 6-6-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
reply to post by buddhasystem
It's wierd, because even Jesus' teachings were filled with allegory and metaphor dealing with evolutionary growth principals in terms of human psychological and spiritual development.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad and so rooted in a level of ignorance of the most simplistic variety, but what I notice equally, as a type of Christian philosopher of sorts, is the amount of ignorance on the other side, which would try to lump all Christians into the same heap of stupidity, which seems to make the atheists feel better for some reason, but from my perspective, it's hurtful, rude, and ignorant.
Originally posted by Pardon?
Originally posted by Tbrooks76
Originally posted by voiceoreason
Bwa ha ha ha ha.
You all don't seriously think that 46 percent of Americans hold creationist beliefs; do you?
Has anyone that believes this gone to any of the major population centers of the USA recently?
I can believe that 46 percent of the rural areas of the US do.
One of two ways..
A. It just was always here with no begin or end and our universe is in a constant state of changing. No big bang or anything, it's just always been.
B. Or it had a beginning in which something outside this universe put everything in motion. (a.k.a GOD)
)
]
Soooooooo, since there isn't yet an explanation for A it must be B?
Or to put it another way, since you don't understand A which may be proven eventually then you'll go for the simpler B which is impossible to prove or disprove?
Your logic is very illogical.
And worrying.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Lionhearte
First...I believe in a persons right of belief and their chosen Religion.
Second...we are on a board which encourages debate and although I respect your Religious Beliefs...I would ask you not to discount FACTS.
FACT...Humans have existed on Planet Earth in one form or another for close to 5 Million Years.
FACT...Evolution stopped being a theory a while back and we use genetics every day and have a very good grasp of how all life on this Planet Evolved with some specific Found Viral DNA encoding that proves that all life Evolved form a Single Celled Organism or Animal.
The only "lab test" I'm aware of where "they created life" only created a small red gel at the bottom of the tube which contained amino acids necessary for life.. only 2 of them, however - instead of the 20 that we need to live - AND it was so toxic, that no life could have survived, as it contained tar and other poisonous substances. In addition to this, they kept it so contained that oxygen could not enter in - because they know that life cannot start with oxygen, YET needs oxygen to live. Not only that, but RNA needs DNA and DNA needs RNA - explain which came first, please.
FACT...By recreating the enviromental conditions that existed Billions of years ago...GENESIS...the act of Life Evolving from Lifelessness...has been reproduced in multiple lab conditions. But in order for the Scientific Method to Prove this was not tainted via improper controls...the act of GENESIS must be repeated more than once and even if that is achieved must be verified...this takes awhile but within 12 to 20 months...verification will take place.
FACT...a VIRUS is not ALIVE yet it has DNA..thus it shows us a stepping stone from Lifeless Aminoacids existed as a Molecular Compound yet have DNA just like all LIFE..the Two Men who Won the Nobel Prize in VIROLOGY won this award in the Nobel Prize for CHEMISTRY not BIOLOGY.
I'd like to see this information if you could provide it.
FACT...Civilizations on the Asian Continent especially in China and Japan have Records that predate BIBLICAL ASSUMPTION of how old the EARTH is and all the BEGETS in the listing of the first People of the Bible.
I didn't say it wasn't perfect, just optimal - the original text in Hebrew and Greek are the ones that are the best. Also, if you could list a few mistranslations from the KJV, that would be appreciated, as an example.
FACT...The KING JAMES BIBLE IS LOADED WITH MISTRANSLATIONS...
FACT...EASTER...was the Christian Attempt to change a Pagan Fertility Holiday of Spring known as the Festival of ESTER
Originally posted by Barcs
Originally posted by Masterjaden
The theory of gravity is NOT the theory of whether gravity exists or not, when you try to use this to parallel the theory of evolution, you showcase your lack of intelligent, logical thought.
The theory of gravity is an attempt to explain the observed phenomena of gravity, not to theorize its existence.
This thread just gets funnier and funnier. The theory of evolution is NOT the theory of whether evolution exists or not. You are serious about that argument?
The theory of evolution is an attempt to theorize the origin of life and is not based on observable phenomena except in the most removed sense...
No its not! Evolution is a biological process of genetic mutations and natural selection that can change organisms over time, a process that is observed, tested and falsified by genetic mutation rate studies.
So please stop showcasing your lack of intelligence by comparing apples and oranges please because the theory of gravity and its cause has some major holes in it as well that requires almost as much circular logic and contrived formulae as the theory of evolution does.
Every single "hole" in the theory of evolution is pretty much made up by dishonest creationist websites, and shows nothing more than clear misunderstanding about the theory itself and the scientific method as a whole. If you've got an issue with the theory please post it and cite the original scientific source that the claim comes from.
Law of Gravity.
Law of Biogenesis.
Law of Thermodynamics
Theory of Evolution.
The difference between gravity and evolution is easy to understand by science's own definitions. No need to make fun of others, be kind and show respect to all.
God Bless,
Ummm no. Laws are measurements, formulas or absolute facts that do not change. Theories DO NOT BECOME laws. The law of gravity explains the mathematical equation for gravity. The THEORY of gravity explains how it works, what causes it, and also includes the LAW of gravity. At least learn your scientific terminology before attempting to discredit a field of science you haven't even read the basics about. Theories aren't just made up because they sound good, they are based on processes that have been proven to exist, such as evolution.edit on 6-6-2012 by Barcs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Masterjaden
I'm sorry, you're just wrong...
I don't even know what creationist websites state. I don't visit them.
The holes in much of science is clear with an historical analysis of their own published theories.
It would literally take volumes to illustrate those holes here.
I'm not going to.
You just keep on worshiping the god of Man and listening to the falsehoods he indoctrinates you with.
Or, you can look at the history of these theories and look at how the theories have evolved to see that they are all circular in argument and just not logical at all.
The only evolution is in the theories over time as they have been proven incorrect and modified to fit new information instead of being discarded as they should have.
Jaden
Originally posted by boymonkey74
Oh and to the people who want proof of evolution, I could post all the info that would stand up in court but whats the point you will just dismiss it.
Sometimes all the evidence in the world could slap some people in the face and they will still be ignorant to the truth.
Originally posted by ElohimJD
I am a scientist, I have studied a multitude of scientific material. Your tone is so revealing of your character, I have never known a truely intellegent person who is so quick to talk down to others intellect, that character is not a smart one.
Biogenesis is the belief that living things come only from other living things, e.g. a spider lays eggs, which develop into spiders. It may also refer to biochemical processes of production in living organisms.
The theory of recapitulation, also called the biogenetic law or embryological parallelism—and often expressed as "ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny"—is a disproven biological hypothesis that in developing from embryo to adult, animals go through stages resembling or representing successive stages in the evolution of their remote ancestors.