It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by Omniview
I am the scientific minded type and hold religion as control for the masses however in the way of evolution is the fact that there has not been found a direct link from us to the monkey or even from monkey to the earliest species of man. We've found remains of early humans but no remains for a being that is somewhere in between monkey and man. I believe in evolution but I dont think we evolved from the ape. I believe we were a seperate species all together different from the ape.
Originally posted by Reflection
Originally posted by Tbrooks76
Evolution vs Creation….Dumb debate…
You all do realize it’s 100% speculation. None of us were there, no go good accountable records with details were taken so anything someone choses to believe about it is pure speculation based on what ‘facts’ the want to believe. There is no 100% fact trail to follow, each side of the debate has tons holes in their theories rather they want to admit it or not. An Evolutionist cannot explain or recreate how the first cell got life, a creationist can’t explain how/why God made the universe so huge and light from stars billions of miles away is hitting the earth. When you look at debates on this, Creationist have damm good point that Evolutionist ignore and well Evolutionist have great points Creationist ignore. Debating it stupid because all you do is point the holes in each other theories…
It boils down to is which set of ‘facts’ you want to follow to get the desired outcome your happy with.
Evolution vs Creation is all personal preference.
This is yet another example of trying to make religion a science (holes in the theory) and evolution a religion (100% speculation).
First off there is no such thing as 100% fact trail. Just like there isn't a 100% chance that with the next step u take the atoms on the ground won't separate and you end up falling into a black hole. It's astronomically improbable, but not 100%.
The reason science is different than religion is because science speculates on whats observed. Religion speculates on blind faith.
Personally, I'm "happy" with highly probable outcomes.... Occam's Razor.
Btw, evolutionists job is not to explain how the first cell, or cells, formed. Just how they evolved from that point.
There are a lot of other sciences working on that problem. The merger between physics and biology continues to grow everyday.
Originally posted by rhinoceros
Originally posted by NewAgeMan
This whole idea of God as just another "guy", except infinitely bigger, is so narrow minded that it's as utterly ridiculous and absurd as the notion that the miracle of life is a purely random occurance without any sort of guiding or organizing principal of creativity.
Why is the latter absurd? If you invoke a preexisting intelligence to explain the laws of nature and reality, then how absurd is the origin of that? I don't claim to understand how it's possible that everything exists. Nonetheless, ever since, things like how galaxies, solar systems, planets, and life from inorganic matter form, have happened through natural processes. Of course it's impossible to rule out a divine intervention, although it really does not look like one was ever needed. It's coincidental that we exist. We wouldn't be here if that meteorite hadn't hit Yucatan ~65 million years ago. Can you seriously believe that this was planned?
Originally posted by Tbrooks76
Originally posted by Reflection
Originally posted by Tbrooks76
Evolution vs Creation….Dumb debate…
You all do realize it’s 100% speculation. None of us were there, no go good accountable records with details were taken so anything someone choses to believe about it is pure speculation based on what ‘facts’ the want to believe. There is no 100% fact trail to follow, each side of the debate has tons holes in their theories rather they want to admit it or not. An Evolutionist cannot explain or recreate how the first cell got life, a creationist can’t explain how/why God made the universe so huge and light from stars billions of miles away is hitting the earth. When you look at debates on this, Creationist have damm good point that Evolutionist ignore and well Evolutionist have great points Creationist ignore. Debating it stupid because all you do is point the holes in each other theories…
It boils down to is which set of ‘facts’ you want to follow to get the desired outcome your happy with.
Evolution vs Creation is all personal preference.
This is yet another example of trying to make religion a science (holes in the theory) and evolution a religion (100% speculation).
First off there is no such thing as 100% fact trail. Just like there isn't a 100% chance that with the next step u take the atoms on the ground won't separate and you end up falling into a black hole. It's astronomically improbable, but not 100%.
The reason science is different than religion is because science speculates on whats observed. Religion speculates on blind faith.
Personally, I'm "happy" with highly probable outcomes.... Occam's Razor.
Btw, evolutionists job is not to explain how the first cell, or cells, formed. Just how they evolved from that point.
There are a lot of other sciences working on that problem. The merger between physics and biology continues to grow everyday.
You wrote: First off there is no such thing as 100% fact trail
That is what I said!!! Its what make both evolution and creation a belief not a fact.
religion is a belief
evolution is a belief
science is science,
science and just to tool to explain things. Evolution itself is not science, it's a theroy which at its core is a belief.
Originally posted by karen61057
reply to post by buddhasystem
Tee hee, they have photos of the giant sequoias that are 100 years old.
Scroll down this page and you will find old daguerreotype photos taken during the 1800's
www.cathedralgrove.eu...
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
reply to post by NewAgeMan
Loneliness begat the universe? Well, yes -- and the desire to know itself.
My dwelling place will be with them; I will be their God, and they will be my people.
~ Ezekiel 37:27
And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God.
~Revelation 21:3
Originally posted by Lionhearte
Originally posted by HumanCondition
Actually I never said they were unintelligent or retarded.
No, no, of course you didn't. They just don't agree with you so they have mental issues.
Evolution is observed everyday and can be seen in your own anatomy.
When you think of Evolution, you are talking about Micro-Evolution, which is simply variation.
When I think of Evolution, I think of 5 things-
Cosmic Evolution, Stellar Evolution, Chemical Evolution, Organic Evolution, and Macro-Evolution.
None of these have been proven true, and just because all six of them (the five above and Micro-Evolution) are all apart of the same theory, does not mean they are all true when you can prove one of them (Micro-Evolution, an OBSERVABLE, TESTABLE, TRUTH).