It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 4hero
Originally posted by waypastvne
Is this not a WTC7 thread?
Originally posted by waypastvne
The truther asked a question I answered it.
Silly.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by GenRadek
How did the super duper pressure air puff managed to skip all the floors between the collapse the blow out?
Path of least resistance.
The floor the air is coming out of is a mechanical floor.
Mechanical floors did not have windows but they did have vents as can be seen in the photo below.
It was less resistance to bypass the floors and exit the vents, than it was to blow out the glass windows.
So simple even a Truther can understand it.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Truthers made up the name Truther not us.
We made up the name Twoofers but the mods won't let us call you that.
Originally posted by 4hero
Hahahaha! I already answered the question, if they did, then it would obviously be due to all the explosions that were going off inside the building.
Hahaha! Report me to the mods, go cry to the mods, I really do not care one bit, if you feel you need to go crying because you are losing your weak arguments then do it, they will then see what a massive troll you've been in this thread!
I guess to you, a 20 story gouge noted by quite a few firemen at WTC7 is just superficial. That and fireproofing being damaged.
You know neither of these are true!
So why did they need to put one on WTC7? If it was going to be blown up, why bother?
Firemen had no idea it was going to be blown up! Stop being ridiculous!
BTW, out of curiosity, what page in the NIST report are the references to the transit?
Picture has been put up earlier. Also found in numerous accounts of firefighters.
That pic is covered in smoke, you cannot tell much from that picture, do you have one without smoke?
Do you have the videos of these firemen's accounts?
What explosions in WTC7? I do not recall explosions in WTC7. I do recall damage and fires causing a slow collapse which caused a bulge to form, hence the use of the transit to monitor the creep. I've never heard of people putting a transit on a building rigged for demo.
Who said I was crying? I am tired of dealing with children acting like trolls in a serious discussion.I have yet see something of substance from you.
Really? Care to back that up with facts, or more childish behavior?
Really? I thought according to truthers they did because they made the order to blow it up according to Larry.
No that is taken from the fire commanders on scene and Chief Hayden. Why would he lie about that? Unless the firefighters did know it was going to be blown up.
SO you do not see that big black line running down the side? Might need to get your eyes checked.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by GiodanoBruno
why was there no water available?
I dont suppose the collapse of the Twin Towers had anything to do with it? Just a thought.
Originally posted by GenRadek
Originally posted by 4hero
Hahahaha! I already answered the question, if they did, then it would obviously be due to all the explosions that were going off inside the building.
What explosions in WTC7? I do not recall explosions in WTC7. I do recall damage and fires causing a slow collapse which caused a bulge to form, hence the use of the transit to monitor the creep. I've never heard of people putting a transit on a building rigged for demo.
Hahaha! Report me to the mods, go cry to the mods, I really do not care one bit, if you feel you need to go crying because you are losing your weak arguments then do it, they will then see what a massive troll you've been in this thread!
Who said I was crying? I am tired of dealing with children acting like trolls in a serious discussion.I have yet see something of substance from you.
I guess to you, a 20 story gouge noted by quite a few firemen at WTC7 is just superficial. That and fireproofing being damaged.
You know neither of these are true!
Really? Care to back that up with facts, or more childish behavior?
So why did they need to put one on WTC7? If it was going to be blown up, why bother?
Firemen had no idea it was going to be blown up! Stop being ridiculous!
Really? I thought according to truthers they did because they made the order to blow it up according to Larry.
BTW, out of curiosity, what page in the NIST report are the references to the transit?
No that is taken from the fire commanders on scene and Chief Hayden. Why would he lie about that? Unless the firefighters did know it was going to be blown up.
Picture has been put up earlier. Also found in numerous accounts of firefighters.
That pic is covered in smoke, you cannot tell much from that picture, do you have one without smoke?
Do you have the videos of these firemen's accounts?
SO you do not see that big black line running down the side? Might need to get your eyes checked.
Ah so you want me to do all your legwork. Sorry buddy, but its been posted countless times before. Use the ATS search button. It is all there. Im not going to repost things only to have it all ignored.
Originally posted by waypastvne
Originally posted by maxella1
reply to post by GenRadek
How did the super duper pressure air puff managed to skip all the floors between the collapse the blow out?
Path of least resistance.
The floor the air is coming out of is a mechanical floor.
Mechanical floors did not have windows but they did have vents as can be seen in the photo below.
It was less resistance to bypass the floors and exit the vents, than it was to blow out the glass windows.
So simple even a Truther can understand it.
Originally posted by psyop911
reply to post by Varemia
all i see is smoke, not fire(s).
all i see is smoke, not fire(s).