It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
First, to maintain interest and principal payments on our debt in the absence of an increase to the debt limit would require drastic and immediate cuts in federal government spending that would hurt the U.S. economy and our country in general. To make sure we do not hit the debt limit, the federal government would need to cut a substantial amount from all spending. This could result in large job losses as public spending would fall sharply on everything from construction projects to social programs to government-sponsored research and development.
This would happen because government-funded programs would have to be cut dramatically, government-funded projects would halt mid-stream, and numerous other drastic cuts would lead to a swift reduction in overall economic activity. All of this would occur during a period in which unemployment remains at historically high levels.
Second, failure to raise the debt limit even if we continue making interest and principal payments on our debt could hurt confidence that investors have in the federal government. Investors might lose faith in the federal government’s ability to come together on other important issues, such as dealing with the deficit and charting a path to a balanced budget. This could lead to significantly higher interest rates, the cost of which would be borne by all taxpayers as well as businesses and consumers—all of whom would also face higher borrowing costs as confidence in the United States eroded.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by braindeadconservatives
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by jibeho
No more spending.
Obama is purposly trying to ruin the country.
If it takes austerity now, then so be it!
Lets turn into Greece, yahhooo!
I'm guessing that is the actual plan. Their plan has been to collapse the system and then bring in the One World Govt and a One World Currency as the solution. At the moment they are diminishing the dollar as just one of a number in a "basket of currencies". Soros wants the Euro to succeed and make Britain come into the European Union.
Originally posted by braindeadconservatives
reply to post by jibeho
How about more revenue?
We have been cutting for three years-
Billionaire George Soros warned on Monday that the euro crisis is growing deeper, tearing at the fabric of European Union cohesion, because policymakers are prescribing the wrong remedies.
"I'm afraid that the euro crisis is getting worse. It's not over yet, and it is going in the wrong direction," Soros said in discussion with Denmark's economics minister hosted by the daily newspaper Politiken.
"The euro is undermining the political cohesion of the European Union, and if it continues like that could even destroy the European Union," Soros said. "That is due to a misunderstanding of what the problem is."
Soros, the Hungarian born U.S. investor, said that the creators of the single European currency believed that imbalances were created in the public sector without understanding that markets themselves can create imbalances.
He said the euro crisis is being dealt with by policymakers as a fiscal crisis though the crisis began as a collapse of the banking system in the United States and was compounded by a divergence of competitiveness among European countries.
'There will be riots on streets of America': George Soros predicts class war in U.S. as euro triggers collapse of global economy
Billionaire New York investor warns of impending economic meltdown
Backs euro and buys Italian bonds from Jon Corzine's failed MF Global
Warns it's 'difficult to know right decisions to make' after boom years
Supports Occupy Wall Street, Democrats and Obama re-election efforts
He has backed the euro, bought $2billion in European bonds and insisted the economic climate is similar to the 1930s Great Depression.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by braindeadconservatives
reply to post by jibeho
How about more revenue?
We have been cutting for three years-
Just raising taxes is not going to bring in enough revenue. They have to stop the mad spending spree. It is unsustainable. Raising taxes will just stifle the recovery. All the taxing is just redistribution of income. The Democrats love to hide behind a need to tax in order to balance the budget. It's called Tax and Spend. The more they tax the more they spend. No matter how many social programs we add to our budget, the Progressives want more and more and more and more. It is a classic Bottomless Pit of spending. They cry out about how unjust it is to not pay for poor people's dinners in addition to lunches, or how terrible the Republicans are to women and their needs, or how awful it is that poor people cannot afford to kill their own preborn, or that the poor illegal children are starving to death while conservatives are supposedly war mongering and killing people in other nations(never mind the Progressives do that too). They cry out that the earth is dying from too much Co2. They cry out that people can't afford health insurance. It just goes on and on and on. If you actually look at some of the crazy stuff Congress actually spends money on, it's nuts.
It's time to stop it. Our Founding Fathers did not intend for half the entire country to go on welfare.edit on 19-5-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
I said SOROS wants the Euro. Yes, they are trying to crash the DOLLAR. Why do you think that is? The Euro is crashing anyway, and Soros does not like that. Plans don't always go the way these nuts want it to. Don't forget there are factions fighting for supremacy.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
reagan raised it 8 times and no republicans got their panties in a bunch
it is an obscure bearocratic mechanism that has never before been used to squeeze a presidents budget
Instead, the House passed, by a vote of 243-173, an amendment to the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) sponsored by Reps. Louie Gohmert (R-Texas), Jeff Landry (R-La.) and Scott Rigell (R-Va.) that affirmed U.S. citizens would not be denied habeas corpus rights.
Smith and Amash had hoped to attract enough support from libertarian-leaning Republicans to pass their measure, but only 19 Republicans voted for it, while 19 Democrats voted against.
Cutting the amount of Money in circulation is what causes depressions,
Originally posted by artnut
reply to post by braindeadconservatives
Just so I am clear here. You propose that there is no need for a balanced budget, ever? The numbers are there, where we are headed, even taxation at 100% pay the debt. What kind of business operates like that successfully? There isn't one. I can't believe how much I just paid the IRS, and my family is FAR from wealthy. We come from low-middle class families, and have worked hard to to make decent salaries. I am PISSED beyond belief that this is even being considered. I can't live or spend outside of my budget, but congress sure can, and they can do it with my money, even when I can't.