Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Video of second object near the Sun, very clear.

page: 4
25
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join

posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 




Why can't it be Planet X? Is that too much for you to handle? Maybe you had better lay off ATS and stick to Huffington Post, it may be more your speed.

Too much for me?


Why can't it be lens flare or lens anomalies?

Because you say so I imagine.

Gee thanks for telling me to lay off ATS, that is very kind of you.

It would also get me out of your hair too, huh?

Planet X takes more unfounded faith in something hugely improbable for me.

gosh maybe I should just leave
ATS since I can't seem to unquestioningly accept something there is absolutely no evidence for in your video.
edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)


I knew you wouldn't be able to respond to my logic and have to attempt some kind of distraction. Please tell me how a lens flare can go behind a clould.
edit on 16-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: epiphany




posted on May, 16 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


Phage gave you some videos you might want to watch, oh supreme logical one.

They should help.

btw you provided the distraction by calling me a shill and a troll then telling me to leave ATS.

Watch those bricks around your glass house.

By your name it is fairly obvious that you're not going to listen to facts or reason on this subject.

If you can't handle dissenting views, why start a thread like this in the first place?
edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 03:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Chamberf=6
 



Don't let him drag you down to his level .
He is obviously so delusional that he cannot , or will not listen to reason .

Pearls before swine



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 03:12 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Glad to see that at least there is one person on this thread who represents a real opinion and/or is open minded, and is not just another "knowledge management specialist" paid to debunk anything related to the coverup.


First sign of an agenda: username.

Second sign of an agenda: call out everyone who disagrees with you as a shill.

Third sign of an agenda: multiple posts leading to a specific site or related sites, i.e. zetatalk, poleshift, etc.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by ColAngus

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Glad to see that at least there is one person on this thread who represents a real opinion and/or is open minded, and is not just another "knowledge management specialist" paid to debunk anything related to the coverup.


First sign of an agenda: username.

Second sign of an agenda: call out everyone who disagrees with you as a shill.

Third sign of an agenda: multiple posts leading to a specific site or related sites, i.e. zetatalk, poleshift, etc.


I find it hillarious that on a site that is called "Above Top Secret" that bills itself as a site dedicated to the intelligent exchage of ideas "on a wide range of "alternative topics" such as conspiracies, UFO's, paranormal, secret societies, political scandals, new world order, terrorism, and dozens of related topics", there are a few predictable posters that pounce on any thread that shows evidence or discusses anything related to Planet X, the Poleshift, Nibiru.

However, on the really whacky topics, where not a shred of evidence exists, such as: "Obama is a reptillian" or "Bigfoot stole my girlfriend" or "George Bush is living on the moon" or "Jesus reincarnated in me" theses posters are never found.

You guys have to stop focusing on the Planet X/Nibiru/Poleshift threads - you are too obvious.

Don't forget, after the shift, those who were knowingly part of the coverup will be skinned alive by the survivors.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Originally posted by ColAngus

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE

Glad to see that at least there is one person on this thread who represents a real opinion and/or is open minded, and is not just another "knowledge management specialist" paid to debunk anything related to the coverup.


First sign of an agenda: username.

Second sign of an agenda: call out everyone who disagrees with you as a shill.

Third sign of an agenda: multiple posts leading to a specific site or related sites, i.e. zetatalk, poleshift, etc.


I find it hillarious that on a site that is called "Above Top Secret" that bills itself as a site dedicated to the intelligent exchage of ideas "on a wide range of "alternative topics" such as conspiracies, UFO's, paranormal, secret societies, political scandals, new world order, terrorism, and dozens of related topics", there are a few predictable posters that pounce on any thread that shows evidence or discusses anything related to Planet X, the Poleshift, Nibiru.

However, on the really whacky topics, where not a shred of evidence exists, such as: "Obama is a reptillian" or "Bigfoot stole my girlfriend" or "George Bush is living on the moon" or "Jesus reincarnated in me" theses posters are never found.

You guys have to stop focusing on the Planet X/Nibiru/Poleshift threads - you are too obvious.

Don't forget, after the shift, those who were knowingly part of the coverup will be skinned alive by the survivors.


Bigfoot hunters and reptilian fanclub members don't tell people to kill their pets, quit their jobs, sell their possessions, uproot their families, and move to the upper reaches of the Himalayas.

So yeah, Nancy now says that the 2003 Planet X arrival date was an intentional dis-info campaign on her part. What about the people that did all of that because they were so paralyzed with fear due to the impending end of the world? Explain it, sport.

Nevertheless, I'm glad Nancy and her followers have put all their eggs into the 2012 basket. No more re-setting the clock after this year, ya hear? You try and peddle a new date after December and the entire lot will be skinned alive.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 




I get a real laugh when people try to talk you out of something you can see with your own eyes

You've seen "Planet X" with your own eyes?

Take any pics or vid?

Guess not since you posted a youtube vid "as seen on glp".

Why not provide ATS and the world a date this doom du jour will occur?

Surely you have an eminent time you expect all the horror given your name and postings.....?
edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:14 PM
link   
and here is a better pic for you, and the second sun is even larger


hmmm, second sun, or some artifact from my camera????? (some internal reflections maybe?)

This was a raw, unprocessed image taken with my professional SLR (Canon 1D MIII) on my solar telescope. When I changed the camera to another camera, my CCD camera, the artifact disappeared). Should I rather believe that my professional SLR picked up something that my astronomical (unfiltered, no mirrors, etc) CCD camera didn't pick up, or is it maybe an image reflected from the IR-filter in front on the sensor, to the backside of the mirror and back into the sensor in my SLR?

Heck, AND the color of the sun is all wrong.... OMG the sun is heating up, it will go Supernova!!!!

The point is, learn your equipment, and learn how to notice if something strange is an artifact of your setup... Don't rely on some Youtube video and jump to conclusions.
edit on 16/5/2012 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:19 PM
link   
reply to post by Hellhound604
 

All this calling something a second sun, then referring to it as a planet....

stars and planets are not the same things.

But in your pic, it looks a hell of a lot like flare or lens issue.

Again.

You edited in the info about your camera I see.

reflection I also see.
edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by Hellhound604
 

All this calling something a second sun, then referring to it as a planet....

stars and planets are not the same things.

But in your pic, it looks a hell of a lot like flare or lens issue.

Again.


--- read between the lines ----


not everything can be contributed to lens-flare or lens-issues. There are more to it, like internal reflections in the optical path, etc, etc, etc ...... In this instance, it wasn't an issue with flare or lens-issues, but rather internal reflections inside the camera (which was never designed to take these kind of pictures), the same as that your average cell-phone cameras/video camera was never designed to take photo's/videos of the unfiltered sun.
edit on 16/5/2012 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)
edit on 16/5/2012 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)
edit on 16/5/2012 by Hellhound604 because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 04:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 




I get a real laugh when people try to talk you out of something you can see with your own eyes

You've seen "Planet X" with your own eyes?

Take any pics or vid?

Guess not since you posted a youtube vid "as seen on glp".

Why not provide ATS and the world a date this doom du jour will occur?

Surely you have an eminent time you expect all the horror given your name and postings.....?
edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)


I'm searching for a red filter then I'll be posting away!

Would you like to know the timetable?



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:02 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 


you don't need a red-filter, you need something like a Baader-filter.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:39 PM
link   
Tough stuff. Taking on in some frames of "second sun", while it's entering behind the clouds, the impression I had is that is a solid object. If you pay attention you can see less denser clouds passing in front of it:








posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:40 PM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 


Whatever it is, it looks like it's actually entering behind the clouds:



If you mess with the saturation of the image, you can see clearly the cloud structure in front of the disk:




posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:40 PM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 


Though moving ahead in the frames, the object seems to be in front of the clouds, but so it's the sun:







Honestly I don't have any conclusive opinion whether this is a reflection, a sun-dog or a celestial object. Anyway it looks almost impossible that an object that big is not noticed all over the planet. Surely people are numb, more worried about texting their phones while walking in the streets, but come on... That's frigging huge and it's not the super moon. At least the uploading date of the videos is almost one week after the moons perigee, but it doesn't mean that the guy who recorded it isn't playing the smart*ss.

edit on 5/16/2012 by 1AnunnakiBastard because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:47 PM
link   
I won't jump to any conclusions, but I'm having a hard time figuring out how a "internal-refraction-of-the-sun-in-polarized-lens", as some people are alleging here, can possibly move behind the clouds.



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:50 PM
link   
reply to post by 1AnunnakiBastard
 


If you pay attention you can see less denser clouds passing in front of it:

What is seen is clouds passing across the face of the Sun, seen in the reflection of the Sun. Here is the same effect seen during a partial eclipse. Instead of clouds, it's the Moon. It can't be seen in the "real" Sun because it is too bright, the reflection is dimmer so the CCD is not oversaturated.

This photo was taking during the partial phase of the eclipse. The green image of the sun is due to an internal reflection of the real sun in the camera.

www.ecliptomaniacs.com...


Whatever it is, it looks like it's actually entering behind the clouds:

It looks that way because the backlit cloud is brighter than the reflection and the sensor is "maxed" out. That is why it becomes visible (against the cloud) when the the cloud moves away from the Sun and is no longer backlit.
edit on 5/16/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 05:53 PM
link   
it's pretty cool, whatever the cause. here's a couple more close ups, in a gif;


edit on 16/5/12 by RoScoLaz because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by 1AnunnakiBastard
Tough stuff. Taking on in some frames of "second sun", while it's entering behind the clouds, the impression I had is that is a solid object. If you pay attention you can see less denser clouds passing in front of it:










Nice shots Anunnaki Bastard! I'm glad someone is more multi-media adept than I am, or the HB Gary proteges would have a field day.
edit on 16-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: epiphany



posted on May, 16 2012 @ 06:45 PM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



Would you like to know the timetable?

LOL sure.

Don't spare a detail.

One would think that if you believe in this impending doom you would set out giving warnings and dates First

instead of arguing about a foreign language vid shot by some Slavic dad.



edit on 5/16/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
25
<< 1  2  3    5  6  7 >>

log in

join