It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Video of second object near the Sun, very clear.

page: 6
25
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 17 2012 @ 07:58 AM
link   

Originally posted by frugal
That is a really neat video, thanks for sharing. I have a degree in photography and cinema from a major big 10 university in the late 1980s, I was an A/B student. I didn't work in the business longer than a year, I went into something else that paid more. So, I will simply tell you from my knowledge, when you move the camera all around and the object stays stationary it is real.

Unless you staged the scene with a binary star. I can't explain what we are seing either. I have never seen two suns while looking at the sun. Those stereo scope pictures of the sun in space don't show two objects... Either we are being deceived by the stereo pictures, or the video of the sun has something going on. With all the Earth Changes going on recently, and the way the oil spill and hurricane katrina were handled...


Thank you, just when I was beginning to think most on here were "knowledge management specialists".



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 08:00 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 




Are you more interested in lining up dates or are you interested in what is possibly the biggest coverup in mankind's history?

Speaking of dates...

you keep avoiding giving the world a "time table" as you called it for this impending doom that "Planet X" is going to cause.

I ask again:

Why quibble over pics when you could warn the world of certain disaster?



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 08:15 AM
link   
If this really were nibiru, no one could hide it. too many amateur astronomers with powerful equipment around, and I've only seen this video with no corroboration. So, I'm disinclined to think this one person captured something that no one else did. I don't have the technical kowledge to determine if it's a double image or lens flare as some have said. It IS interesting. There's a image floating around; I believe it showed the interior of a human cell, and it very much resembled a picture of a galaxy. I wonder if ayone ever superimposed the two to see how well they matched. as Hermes said,"as above, so below"(paraphrase). I say that to illustrate that we really have NO IDEA what's in our solar system. NASA lies to our face, in fact, I'm pretty sure NASA is a cover for the real space program. We probably have all kinds of sentient neighbors, right in the vicinity of earth, but, "the game" is about keeping us in the dark. I hope to find out before I transition; I have roughly 50 years left.
edit on 17-5-2012 by LightsideAssassin because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-5-2012 by LightsideAssassin because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-5-2012 by LightsideAssassin because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:02 AM
link   
OP, do you or anyone who thinks like you, use an ounce of common sense? Do you honestly think NO ONE would notice the huge extra "sun" in the sky? There are amateur astronomers who photograph and film the sun, daily. Huh.. they don't notice it. There are professional institutions. They don't notice it either. There are people who just look at the sun, through dark glass, or just with heavy sunglasses. They don't notice it either. Weird!

How did it get there? Did it sneak up on us?


Objects moving in space do so relatively slowly - it's why certain stars or planets are visible for long periods in the same location. Anything moving through our galaxy would be noticed. ESPECIALLY A SUN. It's sort of noticeable. We can detect the light from suns billions of light years away - but we can't see one in our OWN solar system?


Ask yourself - what is more likely - a sneaky rogue sun that snuck into place to hide next to the sun that absolutely no one noticed.. OR.. a camera anomaly. Which seems more propable?

Isn't odd to you that when people takes pictures of the "extra" sun, it's ALWAYS right next to our existing one? hmmm... I wonder why?


Try to apply a modicum of common sense to your thought process - might open your eyes.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:15 AM
link   
reply to post by fleabit
 


Yes, if it isn't in the MSM then it doesn't exist.

There are thousands of pictures and videos on youtube and Google for anyone who makes the effort to search. Sure, some of them are lens flares and other non-Planet X anomalies, but many are accurate pics/videos of Planet X.

Why don't you take your head out of the sand? It is too late for the government to warn us, though they could have years ago. Their strategy now consists of hoping it isn't as bad as predicted.

I would like to help my fellow man as opposed to trying to keep them in ignorace by giving them a heads up, so they can make some basic preparations.

Just Google Robert Harrington and find out what happens to astronomers who publicly talk about Planet X.
edit on 17-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: epiphany



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:28 AM
link   
Ok, just for the halibut, I just put on a pair of dark shades, and looked through a second pair at the sun. You can do this yourself.. RIGHT NOW! Guess what? omg.. no second sun!


Where did it go? Maybe it's a shy sun, and only comes out for certain people on certain days?


It's funny when you say don't depend on MSM, but then YOU depend on youtube for your belief system. Go do some independent research and get back to me with your fairy-tales, if you can come up with something.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:30 AM
link   
well everyone quit talking about it and go out there with some sunglasses and a camera do the same thing



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:30 AM
link   


Deny Ignorance ppls
reply to post by OccamAssassin
 


Says the ignorant one...



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:32 AM
link   
This is something that I'd have to see with my own eyes.

A video and/or pictures of this "second sun" just won't do it ofr me, because there is too much room for lense reflections and other artifacts that will only appear when looking through a lens. Not to mention tampering that could be done to a video or picture (I'm 99% sure that's not the case here, just sayin).

So yea this is something I'd need to see in person before thinking that there's an actual object there next to the Sun. Whether it be the moon or what have you. I Highly doubt it's a celestial body that has remained hidden from astronomers both ametuer and proffessional for many decades.

My apologies if people were able to see this with the naked eye. But if that were the case I'd think it'd be a major news story.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by Nola213
 


Is this Nola from Kitco and silverstackers? I really respect your posts and wisdom on those sites, and agree with your sentiment. The best thing to use is a red filter from an old floppy disk, and try it at sunrise or sunset. People who are in the path of the upcoming elcipse may have a good opportunity to view it.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:35 AM
link   
I haven't read all the pages of responses (doh!) but the youtube video says...
"I made this video with 2 sunglasses, as my camera is just basic.... "

I bet the "second sun" is the sun as it reflects on one of the 2 sunglasses.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:35 AM
link   
reply to post by fleabit
 

the solar system is huge i mean huge u could hide a planet in it and from what i have been told that it come on a weird orbit i getting my camera out and some sunglasses and doing it too never no what u will find in this case i hope nothing



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:36 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by fleabit
 

I would like to help my fellow man as opposed to trying to keep them in ignorace by giving them a heads up, so they can make some basic preparations.


As mentioned in another PX thread I'm sceptical about this, but I'm not going to go as far as call believers idiots or anything, hell I believe some weird things myself just not PX theory.

Can I ask the question, will the PX theorists give us a date of the next 'flyby' of PX and if it doesn't happen then can we agree the theory is bunk? Of course if it does happen we'll have more to worry about than arguing online :-)

So, anyone gonna step up to the plate with a date?



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:37 AM
link   
IMHO....

The man is holding sunglasses against the front of his lens. The glasses are concave and really close to the lens.

The sun, reflects perfectly off of the front of the lens which is flat. That reflection then images itself onto the back of the sunglass lens as a reflection of a reflection. Follow me?

The reflection on the back of the glasses is very close to the main camera lens which is flat. When you pan around, the reflection in the glasses does not move because the glasses are moving with the lens.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:43 AM
link   
As I have stated before (just to be ignored)

the gravitational effects of a body that large would be immensely felt.

Not just on Earth but the other planets and even our star, the sun.

Why is this ignored?

And I have noticed that the OP says he has a "timetable" for the near future of when all the mayhem is supposed to start --

then he keeps avoided giving that information.

He has also stated that last night he took pics of this "Planet X" then he refused to post his OWN supposed photos of this.

Something smells here and it isn't the flowers.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
It is one thing when people discuss a rumor and debunk it for various reasons, some logical others fallacious, but I get a real laugh when people try to talk you out of something you can see with your own eyes. Very Orwellian.


Well I get really sad when ignorant people cannot find the truth for themselves. This is NOT an object in the sky. It is an effect on the camera. I even made my own pictures similar to this in less than 5 minutes, and they are actually in a post somewhere on ATS. I just went out and snapped pictures of the sun with a crappy digital camera, and wouldn't you know they produced the exact same effect...You're welcome.



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:48 AM
link   

Originally posted by Vasteel

Originally posted by PlanetXisHERE
reply to post by fleabit
 

I would like to help my fellow man as opposed to trying to keep them in ignorace by giving them a heads up, so they can make some basic preparations.


As mentioned in another PX thread I'm sceptical about this, but I'm not going to go as far as call believers idiots or anything, hell I believe some weird things myself just not PX theory.

Can I ask the question, will the PX theorists give us a date of the next 'flyby' of PX and if it doesn't happen then can we agree the theory is bunk? Of course if it does happen we'll have more to worry about than arguing online :-)

So, anyone gonna step up to the plate with a date?


No one knows a date (even though those who know about PX and are part of the coverup are desparate for one). However, the earth geological changes, most induced by increased tectonic activity, such as volcanism, ongoing and increased plate movement and earthquakes, increased mass animal die offs due to methane releases caused by tectonic activity (birds are very sensitive to methane - canary in a coal mine), sinkholes, rockmass shifting noises - are all increasing.

So I will say, if these phenomenon have majorly abated by Jan 2013 without the passage of Planet X, then I will say it has been wrong or a hoax. However, if these phenomenon are still on the increase at that time, I would still be vigilant.
edit on 17-5-2012 by PlanetXisHERE because: grammar, syntax and context



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 09:51 AM
link   
reply to post by PlanetXisHERE
 



So I will say, if these phenomenon have majorly abated by Jan 2013 without the passage of Planet X, then I will say it has been wrong or a hoax.

Why don't I believe you on that point?

I predict that you won't even be on ATS anymore by that time.



No one knows a date

Then why say earlier you could give a "timetable"?
edit on 5/17/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: underline



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 10:04 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6
As I have stated before (just to be ignored)

the gravitational effects of a body that large would be immensely felt.

Not just on Earth but the other planets and even our star, the sun.

Why is this ignored?

And I have noticed that the OP says he has a "timetable" for the near future of when all the mayhem is supposed to start --

then he keeps avoided giving that information.

He has also stated that last night he took pics of this "Planet X" then he refused to post his OWN supposed photos of this.

Something smells here and it isn't the flowers.


Oh, somebody feels ignored? Do you want to be enlightened or focus on your feelings?

Gravity? Ever hear of the 188 day earthquake cycle? If you go back it is easy to see the FACT that a major earthquake was happening every 188 days or so, the last one, the 7.9 Mag in Mexico was off by two days. And yes, 8+ mag earthquakes are extremely rare, you'll notice the before PX entered the solar system in 2003, looking back on 20th century earthquake data, we would go years without having an 8+ Magnitude earthquake. The 188 earthquake cycle wasn't debuked, despite the pathetic attempt by the CIA with their "ley lines" joke, which had every geologist on the Planet laughing. Oh yes, by the way, I am an amatuer geologist.

Current geological theory says it is impossible to have a major earthquake 188 days or close to it. So OBVIOUSLY, there must be something causing these earthquakes, that isn't explained by current geological theory.

That cause is the answer to your question, yes, the gravitational effects of that body are being felt. Also, it is causing the earth wobble as shown in the vidoe that started this other thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Thanks for tying it all together and proving my point!



posted on May, 17 2012 @ 10:06 AM
link   

Originally posted by Chamberf=6

Then why say earlier you could give a "timetable"?
edit on 5/17/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: underline


I would love to see where I said "I could give a timetable".




top topics



 
25
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join