It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Akragon
reply to post by HeFrippedMeOff
Every argument one has presented has been based on private eisegesis and that apart from full context of scripture. Also the appeal to emotion (which is a logical fallacy) plays a large role in the allegation of murder. No sound argument with valid premises has been presented.
Again that is your opinion... every arguement you're presented trying to disprove the fact that the OT God commands such attrocities comes from a brainwashed christian perspective....
The "Trinity" doesn't mean we worship anyone but God as Father. There is no commandment for rape. And "murder" is a misnomer for what is actually happening.
One's arguments have been presented according to one's own words trying to be passed as the Word of God according to scripture therefore this truly has come down to "your words" vs "God's Word."
Incorrect... This verse has NOTHING to do with the trinity with that part removed...
Watch...
And without....
5:7 "For there are three that bear record... the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one."
Don't let yourself be fooled by your religion...
Originally posted by Akragon
The doctrine of "we believe so we can do what we want" is incorrect. What is also incorrect is that Paul teaches such a thing. If you care to know why see Paul in Romans 6 for clarification of his stance and doctrine on the matter.
Sure.. i'll play... Heres the first two verses of Romans 6
What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound?
2 God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?
You are dead to sin... Meaning "Christians don't sin"?
OR
18 Being then made free from sin, ye became the servants of righteousness.
Either Christians do not sin... or no matter what they do... they are blameless...
Both ideas are nonsence... Forgive my cherry picking
Spiritually speaking, the consequences of sin is separation from our Father but Jesus paid that penalty and now by grace through faith he is our redeemer.
Grace is a white wash... a cop out... Jesus said nothing of the sort...
Grace is completly Paulian thought... Jesus did not teach the doctrine of "Grace"...
Listen to Jesus from Romans 9:22, "What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction."
You're kidding right?
Im sorry but if you start claiming that Jesus spoke in Romans im going to have to ignore you.... That is utter foolishnss....
There is much scripture on this very topic but know that no servant can serve two masters. Know that through Jesus Christ we are adopted as His children
More christian propaganda.... We are ALL Gods children... Know ye not the Psalms
6 I have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High.
Am I the "monster" who angers you so with his "atrocities"? Is it my face you long to spit in out of malice? Brother, your war is not with me but with the Father
NO... My issue was never with you..
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by HeFrippedMeOff
I accept Jesus as the way, truth and life so that I may come before the Father in boldness according to grace, love, and mercy.
This looks like a misinterpretation of Hebrews 4:16, where someone has taken it out of context and are making out that it is saying something else.
It is making an analogy to back in the OT the Israelites would come to the High Priest, who had come before God.
We can approach Jesus with confidence because he had come before God.
You should get away from that cult teaching you lies.
Perhaps we could have avoided all this if the concession of "this is just my opinion" was assigned to the allegations of rape and murder and trinity meaning we worship someone other than the Father as Father because like I said, (and in my professional opinion as being a degreed psychologist) your arguments are just opinions and you shouldn't be passing them off as truth if they aren't such.
Here are two scriptures about Jesus being God's equal or rather, "one with God in essence:"
I thought you understood the double-talk. Jesus is not God the Father but is God our Father's only begotten Son whereby whom we are saved.
you stand in contempt.
Akra, I told you that the trinity is an understanding that we get from scripture.
You ignore scripture anyways, why not ignore me too
If you have something against Paul then fine but the Message and its Inspirer speaks for itself.
You should stop cherry-picking and read it all without bias if you can.
Don't you mean, "I [David] have said, Ye are gods; and all of you are children of the most High. But ye shall die like men, and fall like one of the princes." And why? Because of wickedness. And to whom was David speaking? Israel.
Come on, akra.
www.rhnegativeregistry.com...
A young man appeared in Galilee preaching with humble unction, a new law in the Name of the God that had sent Him. At first I was apprehensive that His design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled. Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age. Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny complexions! Unwilling to interrupt Him by my presence, I continued my walk but signified to my secretary to join the group and listen. Later, my secretary reported that never had he seen in the works of all the philosophers anything that compared to the teachings of Jesus. He told me that Jesus was neither seditious nor rebellious, so we extended to Him our protection. He was at liberty to act, to speak, to assemble and to address the people. This unlimited freedom provoked the Jews -- not the poor but the rich and powerful.
Later, I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with Him at the Praetorium. He came. When the Nazarene made His appearance I was having my morning walk and as I faced Him my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement and I trembled in every limb as a guilty culprit, though he was calm. For some time I stood admiring this extraordinary Man. There was nothing in Him that was repelling, nor in His character, yet I felt awed in His presence. I told Him that there was a magnetic simplicity about Him and His personality that elevated Him far above the philosophers and teachers of His day.
Jesus (Yashua’s) Nazarene tribes worshiped a DIFFERENT GOD in separate temples, from the Hebrew tribes of Northern and the Judah Jewish tribes in Southern Israel. THE NAZARENES ALSO HAD THEIR OWN SEPARATE SCRIPTURES. Jesus Yashua never called his God Yahweh Jehovah; in fact he clearly referred to the gods of the Hebrews and Israelites as Satanic entities and knick named them snakes and scorpions. Jesus (Yashua) referred to our GOD as FATHER and instructed his followers to do the same.
The beliefs and customs of Jesus Yashua's Nazarene tribes were very different from what we have been taught in our Orthodox Jewish and Roman Catholic Christian Church’s. For an example, did you know that Jesus (Yashua's) Nazarene tribes believed that human and animal souls came from the same basic soul pool as we did and as such animals were precious. Nazarenes did not kill and eat animals and it was forbidden to sacrifice them like the Hebrews and Jews did to appease their evil gods.
We have to remember here that several different tribes were considered to be Jewish during the time of Jesus (Yashua’s) ministry. All of them had similar, yet at the same time, very different beliefs. Jesus (Yashua) came to minister and reform all of them.
The northern Hebrew tribes worshipped the gods known to us as the Nordic Aryan Alien “Fallen Watchers” The Southern Jews of Judah worshipped Ildabaoth the Demiurge aka Yahweh Jehovah.
The Pharisee, Sadducee, Scribal, Talmud, and Torah Jews led these tribes with hidden doctrines and mystical teachings. Once you begin to read the books in the Nag Hammadi Library that apply to the Nazarene tribal beliefs, you will see that the teachings of Jesus (Yashua) and the Nazarenes were very different from what we have been schooled to believe by our religious leaders.
WE HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND THAT JESUS (YASHUA) CAME TO REFORM THESE SATANIC GROUPS, NOT TO JOIN THEM. KEEP THIS IIN MIND as you read the Nazarene, Essene and Gnostic sites on line. Many of them incorporate SATANIC PAGAN doctrines. Some of them are endorsing the satanic bloodline versions of the HOLY GRAIL facts.
Bull, as in reading things in context, instead of taking a part of a verse and combining it with a part of another verse from a different writer, and making a fake verse that says something not supported by a straight reading of the Bible?
I knew you were gonna come with some bull
Oh, you mean this verse?
My faith is an amalgamation of all I've read in scripture. John 14:6 + Hebrews 4:16 = my personal hope to stand before our Father in boldness of grace, and mercy, and love.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
I absolutely agree with you that our Father's grace through Jesus Christ is for all who would seek Him with their whole heart and although we all have that opportunity right now, many could care less to be one of His children.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
The point here is that not all are His children so what we have here between you and I is a failure to agree upon what it means to be a "Child of God."
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Being creation no more makes me a child of God than it makes a horse a child of God. The Holy Spirit is the difference and it is the difference between those who don't know Jesus and those who are Children of God.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Let us not forget that the Pharisees accused the Spirit in Jesus of casting out devils in the name of the devil. Remember Luke 12:10 "And everyone who will speak a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but he who blasphemes against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him."
Of a truth, not all are the sons of God in Spirit and truth.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Although God knows everything, it didn't stop Him from offering grace to us all. It didn't stop Him from sending a call to each of our hearts but I had to affirm/accept that call before I could honestly say I am adopted as a child of our Father.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
The problem with akragon's proposal is that he equates the "children of God" with all of humankind which is not scriptural and is what you and I have been discussing. Akra also disqualifies God's judgment as being righteous. He doesn't discern between being under the law as was in the OT and being under Grace. Akra does not accept the doctrine of Grace and that is pretty much where akra and I now stand.
Originally posted by Joecroft
You were stating that “his children” being everybody, was incorrect, because they were wicked, and weren’t his sheep etc and in that context you were also condoning this idea, that God killing them, was somehow fine. Please correct me if I’m wrong here….
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
You inferred that I essentially said God doesn’t care about a few people, who he considers aren’t his children. For arguments sake, putting words in peoples mouths works just fine but I never said such a thing nor do I believe such a thing. Not everybody is going to accept Christ or our Father and that means not everyone is His child. For the latter part, God's judgment is fine.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
The Creator has the authority to judge and has every right to take back what he has given. The accusation by akra was murder. I suggested that "the shedding of innocent blood" is not upon God's hands.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
I also suggested that "taking what doesn't belong to you in the first place" is not an accusation we can bring against God. I stand by my word, I believe God to be just and righteous. I feared Him first but perfect love has cast out all the fear.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Again I say, we all have the opportunity to accept grace right now but this doesn't mean that all have or will. I can hope beyond hope that all would but only those who hear his voice and answer the call are His children.
Originally posted by Akragon
So you believe your education gives your "opinion" more weight then mine?
I have regular discussions with a former "minister" who has her masters in divinity, and a few other degrees. Including a batchlor in Nursing, and she agrees with every point i've made.
truth... according to you is found within Gods word. And within what you call "Gods word"... Said omnipotent being has caused/commited numerous attrocities thoughout the timeline of the bible. Thus it is true that this God of the OT can not be the same God as the one Jesus spoke of...
SO... is God unchanging like it says in your book? I believe he is... And OT God is not the same God...
Being one with God does not mean equality... Jesus never once claims he is "equal" with God... Same as he never claimed to be God... Others did... He did not...
I don't understand Most Christian thought... this is why i question.
Jesus didn't claim to be God anything... Gods son... YES!
you stand in contempt.
And if this were medieval times you'd already have me on the stake....
Please....
And i told you already... the trinity is not biblical... it was added to your religion 300+ years after the fact... It was not taught by any of the appostles, or Jesus for that matter...
You ignore scripture anyways, why not ignore me too
I do not ignore scripture... i simply have no use for most of what is found within the bible...
I would hope since you're putting up such a fight... that you would know where his words are located... Romans is not one of those places... This creates a serious problem with me... simply because if you don't know the basics how can anyone take you seriously in these discussions?
If you have something against Paul then fine but the Message and its Inspirer speaks for itself.
Correction...
Paul speaks for himself... And no one else...
You should stop cherry-picking and read it all without bias if you can.
Perhaps you might take your own advice?
Come on what...
Are they any different then the rest of us?
Perhaps Gods children are only born in israel?
Do you believe there is a difference between a white man and a black man? OR someone born in Israel as opposed to maybe... the states?
Wake up bro... All life is of God... we are children of God... Animal life are creatures of God... the planets and the stars are creations of God
Perhaps your God has limits... Mine does not....
The "devil" you speak of in those verses represents materialism... That is why it says you can not serve two masters...
You either serve the spirit (which is all man kind) or the material world... meaning selfishness...
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by HeFrippedMeOff
Bull, as in reading things in context, instead of taking a part of a verse and combining it with a part of another verse from a different writer, and making a fake verse that says something not supported by a straight reading of the Bible?
I knew you were gonna come with some bull
Baseless arguments built on malformed premises and logical fallacies are evident apart from opinion but certainly I have the credentials and education to identify such things and of a truth, your arguments are full of both. Take it for what it's worth but I'm as open-minded as the next guy and you have yet to shake my faith according to what it is your trying to pass as truth.
A "former" minister? I don't know how that's supposed to make your argument legitimate. Nevertheless, consensus doesn't make truth. There are many who would agree with your points. Many more will not. I don't because of my education in psychology as well as my education in reading the bible for myself. It's just that simple. Take it or leave it.
False. Your argument is based on the subjective opinion that atrocities have been committed denying the very God this argument is against His right as Supreme Authority, Creator, and owner of all including life and death.
Did the OT God not have mercy on whom He would have mercy; and judgment upon whom He would have judgment?
To present a valid argument against God one has to allow Him His authority otherwise logic and reason are out the window and all that's left is emotional rant against one who by definition is of no power nor entitled to authority and as such is therefore not God
His followers taught that Jesus didn't find it robbery to be equal with God
Otherwise, sin would still be holding him in the grave.
If you want to make baseless assertions according to opinions and pass them off as truth then you certainly can do that
Hardly. I'm a pacifist according to my faith. You must be thinking about the Catholics or the warmongering republican Christians. You should take it up with one of them.
If you respect Jesus then you should heed Jesus when he commands us to love the Lord our God with all our heart, soul, mind, and strength and to place no other God's before Him. Spitting in the monsters face isn't going to help you at all in this life or the next. For your own emotional well-being in this life I propose finding some semblance of peace with our and Jesus Father
How profound! You don't ignore scripture......unless you have no use for it?
Good grief. Judge yourself by your own words much?
Like I say, the message speaks for itself. Perhaps you can show me where Paul errs in teaching according to the Holy Spirit?
I'm not the one who admittedly cherry picks while disregarding scripture he has no use for according to his own understanding.
Your argument was that God proclaims all are His children using a verse quoted of David.
That's what.
Like I said, being creation no more makes a donkey a child of God than being a creature of God makes you or me a child of God. Being a child of God is determined in possessing the Holy Spirit.
Stop thinking that you're going to heaven according to your good works and accept the fact that you can't do, and be however you want regardless of the will of our Father.
Have you not defined your God as being limited to what you find usable and not usable?
Question is are you really serving a god who you are creating according to what you want him to be and not according to who he is independent of us?
Question is, how is it not selfish to refuse God authority in so much that we cherry-pick what we want and refuse what we don't understand thereby transforming God's existence and authority into being subject to us and our desires as opposed to granting our Father due benevolence as independent and not subject to us?
Originally posted by Joecroft
Thanks, it good to know that people see things that way, and don’t buy into this predestination theology.
Now in the context of how your using the term Child of God, do you think this means that God has the right, or that he would command others to kill those, who weren’t yet children of God?
Well, here’s how I see it…I qualify God as righteous, because he didn’t command others to kill for him. We are under grace now but even in OT times, men were being declared righteous and unrighteous by God all the time. But God still gave many unrighteous men, time to change, and find him, without commanding anyone, to kill them ,for him, before they got to that point. And like I said in my last post, God never changes, so his judgments have to remain just and consistent.
But on one hand you say I’m putting words into your mouth, and on the other, your saying Gods judgment was fine? So which is it?
Let your yes, be yes and your no, be no…by “God's judgment is fine”, do you see God commanding people to kill non-beliers, as somehow just and righteous?
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
The Creator has the authority to judge and has every right to take back what he has given. The accusation by akra was murder. I suggested that "the shedding of innocent blood" is not upon God's hands.
Well, in a way, it is on Gods hands, especially if you believe that God commanded those evil things. Which I don’t btw…
Originally posted by Joecroft
Yes, but even in OT times God allowed others time to become righteous, but by believing that God commanded others to kill unbelievers, your essentially saying, that God breaks his own laws, and his own judgment plan.
I meant coming to the table without a lick of understanding.
A "former" minister? I don't know how that's supposed to make your argument legitimate. Nevertheless, consensus doesn't make truth. There are many who would agree with your points. Many more will not. I don't because of my education in psychology as well as my education in reading the bible for myself. It's just that simple. Take it or leave it.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
For me, saying "predestination" is like saying "free will."
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
If there is nothing new under the sun, if there are only a limited and set amount of choices to be made in any given situation then on a certain level "free-will" would be a lie we have told ourselves to make us feel better about being slaves to whatever.
Although God knows who will and who will not be His, I believe grace was predestined whereas our self-centered understanding of "predestination" exists as a notion to make us feel better about an uncertain future.
So I do believe in predestination and free-will, just not as the masses do.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Scripturally I read our Father will have mercy upon whom he will have mercy, and vengeance upon whom judgement is reserved. This is totally at His discretion as far as I am concerned and I believe in the righteousness of whatever judgment He passes, for He is God.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
You say many who were unrighteous were given time to repent but many also fell in an instant. Our time to repent are the moments we have breath. and we don't know when the last might come.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
I never said He doesn't care and that's where you put words in my mouth. His judgment is fine and if you don't agree then perhaps we need to address the conundrum of worshiping "our Father, the Unrighteous who exacts judgment where He has no authority or dominion."
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
Since "grace" we have our commandments. As far as the OT goes, if you'll provide the reference perhaps we can discuss why judgment was passed and how it is or is not a righteous judgment according to the One with all authority and dominion and power.
Originally posted by HeFrippedMeOff
You say God gave some time to become righteous therefore if He commands that anybody kill anybody then He is not giving all time to be righteous and is thus breaking His own laws but what you are disregarding is God's right to determine each of our times as He sees fit.