It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by frazzle
Jean Paul: All warfare is based upon deception, but I am not at war with you, or with the Sioux Nation. I am, however, entirely unimpressed with the United Nations and their facile form of nonsense. Your willingness to use deception does make me wonder why it is you are at war with me?
I'm not at "war" with anyone. And I'm not being emotional. The Sioux want their lands back and the US government wants to give them worthless chits. What a good plan.
I am not a fan of the UN, either, just as I am not a fan of the US government. If the government had dealt honorably with the native peoples in the first place, we'd be talking about something else right now. But that's not how it works. Heck, even being an ally of the US government is about the stupidest thing you could do. Just ask Saddam. Or Bin Laden. Oh wait, you can't.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by frazzle
Jean Paul: All warfare is based upon deception, but I am not at war with you, or with the Sioux Nation. I am, however, entirely unimpressed with the United Nations and their facile form of nonsense. Your willingness to use deception does make me wonder why it is you are at war with me?
I'm not at "war" with anyone. And I'm not being emotional. The Sioux want their lands back and the US government wants to give them worthless chits. What a good plan.
I am not a fan of the UN, either, just as I am not a fan of the US government. If the government had dealt honorably with the native peoples in the first place, we'd be talking about something else right now. But that's not how it works. Heck, even being an ally of the US government is about the stupidest thing you could do. Just ask Saddam. Or Bin Laden. Oh wait, you can't.
All of which has little do to with any post I've made. I have not made an argument advocating the U.S. keeping the Black Hills from the Sioux. What I have done is post links to illustrate the complexity of this issue, and for that effort you disingenuously addressed one post by quoting an entirely different post, all the while taking me to task as if I've done anything other than offer up context.
"Refused the remedy offered" sounds a bit critical of their demand for the return the land, but perhaps I'm missing the nuance. And of course it doesn't matter what you advocate anyway, we both know that highly valuable piece of real estate is "too good" to give back. regardless of what the UN might say.
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Apparently I am not as cynical as you on this.
Apparently.
Uncle Sam isn't good at giving things away and neither are the people who think they own those things. You're right, though, its complex and you have to be there to know HOW complex.
Originally posted by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Originally posted by frazzle
reply to post by Jean Paul Zodeaux
Apparently I am not as cynical as you on this.
Apparently.
Uncle Sam isn't good at giving things away and neither are the people who think they own those things. You're right, though, its complex and you have to be there to know HOW complex.
Are you suggesting you were there? Damn! Just how old are you?
Senate Bill 2109 Seeks to Extinguish Navajo and Hopi Water Rights
www.nativenewsnetwork.com...
TUBA CITY, ARIZONA – Senators Jon Kyl, Arizona - R, and John McCain, Arizona - R, will be in Tuba City on Thursday, April 5, 2012, to persuade Navajo Nation and Hopi Tribal leaders to give up their peoples' aboriginal and Treaty-guaranteed priority Water Rights by accepting a "Settlement Agreement" written to benefit some of the West's most powerful mining and energy corporations.
They are doing so by trying to persuade the Navajo Nation and Hopi leaders to support and endorse Senate Bill 2109. Senate Bill 2109 45; the "Navajo-Hopi Little Colorado River Water Rights Settlement Act of 2012" was introduced by Kyl and McCain on February 14, 2012, and is on a fast track to give Arizona corporations and water interests a "100 th birthday present" that will close the door forever on Navajo and Hopi food and water sovereignty, security and self-reliance. S.2109 asks the Navajo and Hopi peoples to waive their priority Water Rights to the surface waters of the Little Colorado River "from time immemorial and thereafter, forever" in return for the shallow promise of uncertain federal appropriations to supply minimal amounts of drinking water to a handful of reservation communities.
The Bill - and the "Settlement Agreement" it ratifies - do not quantify Navajo and Hopi water rights - the foundation of all other southwestern Indian Water Rights settlements to date - thereby denying the Tribes the economic market value of their water rights, and forcing them into perpetual dependence on uncertain federal funding for any water projects. Senators Kyl and McCain know well that without water, life is not
possible. Yet, their Bill and the "Settlement Agreement" close the door forever to any possibility of irrigated agriculture and water conservation projects to heal and restore Navajo and Hopi watersheds (keeping sediment from filling downstream reservoirs) to grow high-value income and
employment-producing livestock and crops for Navajo, Hopi and external markets; and to provide once again for healthy, diabetes - and obesity-free nutrition and active lifestyles for all future generations of Navajo and Hopi children.
Senators Kyl and McCain demand that the Navajo and Hopi people waive and give up all their rights to legal protection of injury to surface and ground water supply and quality in the past, present, and future - yet the Navajo and Hopi peoples do not even know the full extent and nature of the rights they are being pressured to waive because the details of the "Settlement Agreement" are not being shared with the public.
This is wrong.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by KonquestAbySS
Native ancestry?
Like how my family has been in this country for over 200 years?
Am i not a native?
Originally posted by neo96
A United Nations investigator probing discrimination against Native Americans has called on the US government to return some of the land stolen from Indian tribes as a step toward combatting continuing and systemic racial discrimination.
James Anaya, the UN special rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, said no member of the US Congress would meet him as he investigated the part played by the government in the considerable difficulties faced by Indian tribes.
www.guardian.co.uk...
Who the hell does the UN think they are?
Seriously.
No one will argue what happened to the native Americans was a really crappy thing to have happened NO ONE but the simple fact is that is the only reason you and I even exist in this world.
The UN itself would not exist and would not have a tax free spot in New York paid for mostly by Americans and on Native American land.
Hey UN how bout give up all that multimillion dollar posh real estate that you can sit there and judge how evil Americans are.
Of all the damn nerve!
I can't stand the UN and to sit there and dictate to the US what WE should be doing and it's not just this it's all the stupidity of the UN thinking they have the power to tell Americans what to do.
Blah.edit on 4-5-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)