Please, before posting, refer to:
Changes Coming to Conspiracies in Religion
"There is something feeble and contemptible about a person who cannot face life without the help of comfortable myths and cherished illusions."
The Preface to the New King James Version (NKJV) reads, "A special feature of the New King James Version is ITS CONFORMITY to the thought flow of the
1611 Bible. . . the new edition, while much clearer ARE SO CLOSE to the traditional. . ."
Thomas Jefferson didn't care too much for the Bible, in fact, he wrote his own New Testament.
The Jefferson Bible
The Religious Affiliation of Third U.S. President - Thomas Jefferson
Of all the books in the King James Bible, there isn't one handwritten original that is knwon to exist. We don't even have the first copies of the
originals, what we do have, is copies of copies of copies of copies, and what people remember who read the texts. The writers in Ancient Times had a
looser standard for accuracy in their writings, or copying texts. Sometimes they wrote in other, more famous authors' names. They would add,
subtract, alter, or outright remove "historical" events/place names/dates in the texts as they, or their Masters saw fit. Sometimes, blatant fiction
was mixed together with truth, (Mishmash) and some of the scribes wrote texts in the name of Church enemies, to discredit the writer entirely. Then
the forged text could be used against them in later times, if need be. This in itself speaks of a hidden agenda.
The “Q Document”
was used by the Roman Emperor Constantine to wholly construct the New
Testament, the characters within the stories, and the writers of the stories. I believe that members of the Royal Family of Piso were the composers of
the New Testament, and that the apostles were in fact Piso family members.
The main reasons for the New Testament being written was, in my humble opinion:
1. As a means by which to preserve and continue the continued practice of servitude to a Royal Family.
2. To create and make Law of the Land an official religion to quell all of the dissent of the time in Roman controlled lands, and in Rome herself.
So, Emperor Constantine and crew devised a male-dominated religion, complete with an all male Godhead, (Trinity) which he aptly named, "The Roman
Universal Church". The New Testament’s fabricated story about Jesus’ “Virgin Birth” was included mostly because Constantine had earlier
declared himself of Divine Origin, and also of the stories of Mithra. In later times, mostly in Spain and Germany, this all male domination in the
religion caused over one million women to be executed by torture and burning
(Constantine) (272-337) is wholly responsible for the New
Testament we have today. Constantine, after his Father died, had suddenly became King over Gaul, Britain, and Spain, and was quite upset at all of the
political/religious dissent and infighting, mostly over the many Gods and differing beliefs. In those times when one stated he was a Christian, it may
mean he had belonged to one of many different sects. Christian historians give not so much as a hint of the fighting going on, and the trouble brewing
How the Gospels were created
Constantine then instructed Eusebius to organize the compilation of a uniform collection of new writings developed from primary aspects of the
religious texts submitted at the council. His instructions were:
"Search ye these books, and whatever is good in them, that retain; but whatsoever is evil, that cast away. What is good in one book, unite ye with
that which is good in another book. And whatsoever is thus brought together shall be called The Book of Books. And it shall be the doctrine of my
people, which I will recommend unto all nations, that there shall be no more war for religions' sake."
(God's Book of Eskra, op. cit., chapter xlviii, paragraph 31)
The somewhat esteemed Catholic Encyclopedia supports the theory that the Gospels of Christianity were written no earlier than the 4th Century, saying:
”the earliest of the extant manuscripts of the New Testament, it is true, do not date back beyond the middle of the fourth century AD”
Friends, that is 400 years after the so called Jesus supposedly died. Most Historians began the practice of dating all religious manuscripts with a
2nd. Century date, no matter that real date.
The practice of Christian forgery certainly has a long history, but the evidence of the practice of Christian forgery appeared in the 4th century,
with the creation of the New Testament and the man known as Jesus.
But is any of it true? The writers of the New Testament used the words "true" and "truth" 170 times, but that in itself does not mean it was
P52 Oldest New Testament Based on a papyri Fragment
THE RYLANDS PAPYRUS FRAUD
So much in New Testament history hinges on the Rylands Papyrus (P52). After all, this is supposed to be the earliest fragment of the New Testament
that we possess. In every standard Introduction to NT, it is said that this tiny piece of writing, which contains only 118 legible letters, is dated
"at about 125 AD".
There are said to be between 180,300 and 180,600 words in the King James New Testament, of course various translations have more/less words. How did
all those words come from this one papyri fragment, if someone didn't just make most of it up out of thin air?
Why there are no records of Jesus Christ?
Well, if an event, or events, are not written about until many years has passed after the fact, memories are distorted, or false, or missing
entirely, and a lot of what happened is lost. Also, the Gospels and Acts were not written by eyewitnesses. It was, however, was written by frauds who
misrepresented themselves as eyewitnesses.
Arrius Calpurnius Piso
was a Roman General, and it was he that captured the city of
Jerusalem for Rome in 66 CE. I have come across some evidence that this Arrius Calpurnius Piso is none other than Flavius Josephus himself, the famous
Jewish Historian who supposedly wrote two paragraphs on the miracle man Jesus. I am not in any way certain of this, but it does make sense. The name
turns up nowhere on any site dedicated to Roman history, Latin studies, or anywhere having to do with serious research on Roman History. It is known
that Julius] Caesar was an in-law of the Piso family. His wife, Calpurnia, was a Piso. I have also read a little on Arrius Calpurnius Piso being Philo
of Alexandria in reality, also. The man certainly got around.
THE SYNTHESIS OF CHRISTIANITY