It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ButterCookie
I am having serious conversations wit family and friends about 9/11, and the possibility that the planes were hologram....
I had always assume it was a silly theory until....
Project Blue Beam does not sound so 'unrealistic' anymore.....
Originally posted by XXX777
Dats a pants sagogram. Why arybody tearin up?
Skittles 4 days!!!
Originally posted by jacktorrance
reply to post by ButterCookie
Project Blue Beam does not sound so 'unrealistic' anymore.....
As much as the pains the debunker and skeptic in me to say this - I completely agree.
If Hollywood can do it, our governments should be able to do it 10x better.
Originally posted by Alien Abduct
reply to post by aching_knuckles
If tech good enough to make a hologram this good is available to mere millionaires imagine what the government has developed with it's budget of 700 BILLION dollars A YEAR.
I would imagine their holograms look as convincing as a real person even up close. They might even be able to project them from satellites. And, if they can project a convincing person there's pretty much no limit on what they can project size probably doesn't matter............alien invasion ??
-Alien
Originally posted by squidboy
Watched the video a handful of times.
First, there are cuts in the video that show different angles. When the angle is different, it corresponds with the proper position of the Tupac. Meaning a Side angle shows the side, front angle shows the complete front.
How is that possible if this is a 2nd dimension image on a invisible screen with one fixed view? Doesn't that disprove it as 2d? If the angle switches, and shows a different body part from the front view, isn't the image then quasi-3d? Is that possible with a 2nd screen image?
I just wish there were better quality video out. I've seen pictures, and the quality is much better then the video. The realy image sort of looked digitized, but very real looking.
The close up of the tattoos was also interesting. If it's an actor, they really painstakingly tried to recreate the tattoos. Did they digital recreate every tattoo?
If this a recording of Pac from a previous performance, his actions for the intro and outro would be sort of odd, considering he makes an entrance standing and rising up, and then waits to disappear. Why would he have done that in a previous performance. So, it must be an actor...
Also, the voice when he says Coachella is pretty spot on. Exact pitch, and diction as TuPac,
It's also weird because, he face looks older. Like an older Tupac (hard to tell).edit on 16-4-2012 by squidboy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by squidboy
Watched the video a handful of times.
First, there are cuts in the video that show different angles. When the angle is different, it corresponds with the proper position of the Tupac. Meaning a Side angle shows the side, front angle shows the complete front.
How is that possible if this is a 2nd dimension image on a invisible screen with one fixed view? Doesn't that disprove it as 2d? If the angle switches, and shows a different body part from the front view, isn't the image then quasi-3d? Is that possible with a 2nd screen image?
I just wish there were better quality video out. I've seen pictures, and the quality is much better then the video. The realy image sort of looked digitized, but very real looking.
The close up of the tattoos was also interesting. If it's an actor, they really painstakingly tried to recreate the tattoos. Did they digital recreate every tattoo?
If this a recording of Pac from a previous performance, his actions for the intro and outro would be sort of odd, considering he makes an entrance standing and rising up, and then waits to disappear. Why would he have done that in a previous performance. So, it must be an actor...
Also, the voice when he says Coachella is pretty spot on. Exact pitch, and diction as TuPac,
It's also weird because, he face looks older. Like an older Tupac (hard to tell).edit on 16-4-2012 by squidboy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by Danbones
Tupac is rolling around in his grave, he would hate the direction of today's music industry...