It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by squidboy
Watched the video a handful of times.
First, there are cuts in the video that show different angles. When the angle is different, it corresponds with the proper position of the Tupac. Meaning a Side angle shows the side, front angle shows the complete front.
How is that possible if this is a 2nd dimension image on a invisible screen with one fixed view? Doesn't that disprove it as 2d? If the angle switches, and shows a different body part from the front view, isn't the image then quasi-3d? Is that possible with a 2nd screen image?
I just wish there were better quality video out. I've seen pictures, and the quality is much better then the video. The realy image sort of looked digitized, but very real looking.
The close up of the tattoos was also interesting. If it's an actor, they really painstakingly tried to recreate the tattoos. Did they digital recreate every tattoo?
If this a recording of Pac from a previous performance, his actions for the intro and outro would be sort of odd, considering he makes an entrance standing and rising up, and then waits to disappear. Why would he have done that in a previous performance. So, it must be an actor...
Also, the voice when he says Coachella is pretty spot on. Exact pitch, and diction as TuPac,
It's also weird because, he face looks older. Like an older Tupac (hard to tell).edit on 16-4-2012 by squidboy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by WinnieDaWho
So Ladies and Gentlemen, any Ats'ers expected that a technology such as these would come from a music industry rather than the Military?
Originally posted by Juggernog
Hmm, doesnt make holographic planes seem so improbable now, does it?
btw, I really dont get the appeal for Tupac and why he is considered a "legend" his rapping sounds no different to me than any other foul mouthed rappers
Originally posted by micpsi
reply to post by JibbyJedi
That video is NOT evidence that Flight 175 was a hologram. The only reason why some people claim that it was was the apparent disappearance of its left wing shortly before impact. But this is because 1. the plane is in the shadow of the building and its left wing has the same grey colour as the building in the impact area, and 2. the highly compressed video has insufficient resolution to make the left wing visible, although the right wing stays visible.
Originally posted by TruthxIsxInxThexMist
I'm pretty sure MJ will be back soon to do a concert!!
And apart from what i said in the other thread about this..... Star Trek here we come.