Democrats Declare 'War On Moms'

reply to post by beezzer


Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by braindeadconservatives

Originally posted by beezzer


They'll make "being successful" the new insult.

Well hopefully they will point out the sense of not having an Elite who makes

$58,000 a day govern a nation of people who are lucky to make that in a year.

Who do you think he is going to focus on?

WHO CARES ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY HE MADE?

Sorry, didn't mean to shout. It's about policy. Not bank accounts.

Fail.

Epic bloody fail!

By most account Romney is a full blown LIBERAL

So if you are talking policy, you should be bashing him.


but maybe you guys are just too sorry to think for yourselves.
You guys have been bashing Obama because of his "liberal":
policies and now you are gonna tow the line for a liberal?

Isn't that pathetic? Don't you have any fortitude?

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

Taking things out of context sure is going to be common-place.

When Obama was running, I often wrote (not here) to pay attention to policy, not colour.

Now that Romney is running, I'm just going to have to repeat; pay attention to policy, not checking accounts!

reply to post by braindeadconservatives


We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

"We can only HOPE Romney is better"....??? That is not good enough. Go back a page at the bottom and read what I said. You are fooled into thinking you have no alternatives...

And hope Romney is better? You can hope in one hand and crap in the other and see which one fills up first.




We need someone more like this (though I don't agree with this party, I like their mascot nonetheless)

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

That is pathetic

It's gonna be cool watching all of you defend liberal policies and
be FORCED to go along with a person because you guys go
along with anything you are programed to go along with.


Whatever the TV say is true... You guys are truly like zombies

Originally posted by Damrod

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

"We can only HOPE Romney is better"....??? That is not good enough. Go back a page at the bottom and read what I said. You are fooled into thinking you have no alternatives...

And hope Romney is better? You can hope in one hand and crap in the other and see which one fills up first.

edit on 4/13/2012 by Damrod because: (no reason given)

Well cast your ballot for Obama then.

Good luck

Originally posted by braindeadconservatives

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

That is pathetic

It's gonna be cool watching all of you defend liberal policies and
be FORCED to go along with a person because you guys go
along with anything you are programed to go along with.


Whatever the TV say is true... You guys are truly like zombies

And voting for Obama is a smart choice?

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

Yeah, let's vote for the guy who built his entire career around FIRING PEOPLE and BREAKING UP COMPANIES.

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by Damrod

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

"We can only HOPE Romney is better"....??? That is not good enough. Go back a page at the bottom and read what I said. You are fooled into thinking you have no alternatives...

And hope Romney is better? You can hope in one hand and crap in the other and see which one fills up first.

edit on 4/13/2012 by Damrod because: (no reason given)

Well cast your ballot for Obama then.

Good luck

Well obviously....republicans don't think outside the box because they either can't read or can't think....which is it? I said go back and read my post at bottom of last page (page 9 I think)

NVM...This has fallen off topic.

The Romney's don't understand the concerns of most voting women....because most voting women live a totally different life. This is what the lady that made the stupid comments was trying to say...but she said it....well...in a stupid way.

Romney shouldn't be allowed to win...no one should be able to "buy" the Whitehouse...

The POTUS shouldn't be allowed to be relected....his policies have been luke warm and tepid at best and has not accomplished what was needed.

I'm not voting for either of them. I will do my REAL civic duty and find a party and a candidate that isn't a rubber stamp of the last 32 years

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

Yeah, let's vote for the guy who built his entire career around FIRING PEOPLE and BREAKING UP COMPANIES.

Awesome!

Maybe he can break up government and fire the useless bureaucrats!

reply to post by beezzer

Maybe he can break up government and fire the useless bureaucrats!

good one

By the way...while are discussing this Democrat war on women the GOP is moving along further cutting women's rights.

LINK

So not only are they cutting women's reproductive rights, they are now also against equal pay. I'm sure that'll bring them a lot of women votes in the coming election

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

obama made 789,000 dollars this year....

Obama/biden tax returns

Theres proof

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

Taking things out of context sure is going to be common-place.

When Obama was running, I often wrote (not here) to pay attention to policy, not colour.

Now that Romney is running, I'm just going to have to repeat; pay attention to policy, not checking accounts!

It's official !!! Hilary Rosen works for us now!

- Hilary Rosen Gaffe Bumper Stickers ! -

They only cost $6 !

Her War on Moms will live - on - forever !

We will always remember the Hilary Rosen gaffe of 2012.

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

Taking things out of context sure is going to be common-place.

When Obama was running, I often wrote (not here) to pay attention to policy, not colour.

Now that Romney is running, I'm just going to have to repeat; pay attention to policy, not checking accounts!

It's hard to pay attention to Romney's policies...because the change all the time.

The only thing he is consistent on is money...he likes it...he wants it...he wants to keep all of it....and his economic policies do reflect that. The rich get the benefits under Romney...his philosophy is that when the Rich do well...we all do well...commonly known as trickle down economics.

But no one wants to say "trickle down economics" anymore because everyone knows it doesn't work.

Originally posted by DrNotforhire

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

obama made 789,000 dollars this year....

Obama/biden tax returns

Obama has never claimed that $375,000 is not a lot of money. Obama is all about the poor. He was a community organizer in inner-city Chicago (much to the disgust of the GOP).

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by MrXYZ

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by braindeadconservatives

 

We know, tht if Obama is re-elected, things will get worse.

We can only hope, that Romney is going to be better.

So we have a sure BAD option.

And we have a maybe.

I'm taking the maybe.

Yeah, let's vote for the guy who built his entire career around FIRING PEOPLE and BREAKING UP COMPANIES.

Awesome!

Maybe he can break up government and fire the useless bureaucrats!

Romney should - hire - Hilary Rosen.

She has earned it. Make her a Czar. - The Gaffe Czar ? -

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher

Originally posted by beezzer

Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by beezzer

 

Actually it has a lot to do with it. When someone makes a comment that $375,000 isn't a lot of money, and that they are not concerned about the poor because they have a "safety net". You don't want them making policy decisions.

Taking things out of context sure is going to be common-place.

When Obama was running, I often wrote (not here) to pay attention to policy, not colour.

Now that Romney is running, I'm just going to have to repeat; pay attention to policy, not checking accounts!

It's hard to pay attention to Romney's policies...because the change all the time.

The only thing he is consistent on is money...he likes it...he wants it...he wants to keep all of it....and his economic policies do reflect that. The rich get the benefits under Romney...his philosophy is that when the Rich do well...we all do well...commonly known as trickle down economics.

But no one wants to say "trickle down economics" anymore because everyone knows it doesn't work.

Correct.

Another description of "Trickle down economics"

"Just pee on my head and tell me it's raining"

Epic fail economic strategy....never has worked, never will.

But neither does "wealth re-distribution".

Give me a level playing field, stop the crony capitalism, the monopolies and the corrupt government...lower my taxes, stop taking my money and giving it away.... and I will be just fine all on my own. It's called free-market and free trade..... "We don't need no stinking two party system..."

reply to post by kaylaluv

Obama has never claimed that $375,000 is not a lot of money. Obama is all about the poor. He was a community organizer in inner-city Chicago (much to the disgust of the GOP).

Oh boy what a hornets nest,

Obama just panders to the poor,

never mind, that's another topic.