It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Democrats Declare 'War On Moms'

page: 9
18
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:49 AM
link   
reply to post by kosmicjack
 


The fact is that Rosen doesn't speak for the Democratic party any more than I do.

The bobble heads are in full effect.....



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 





Attacking Moms Across America will only send more women to vote for Mitt Romney.


They don't have to attack moms/Ann, the internet minions will do it for them.

We seen what went on on this forum last election.

First call you a racist for being anti Obama, now they have class warfare too,

I was never called a racist in my life and was shocked when people used that against me, because the race issue never crossed my mind until they brought it up,

They know better, they just use it.


edit on 113030p://bFriday2012 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:53 AM
link   

Originally posted by Blarneystoner
reply to post by kosmicjack
 


The fact is that Rosen doesn't speak for the Democratic party any more than I do.

The bobble heads are in full effect.....


If Hilary Rosen ( my new hero) was a nobody then Obama would have ignored

her remarks.

He didn't. Obama came out and threw Hilary Rosen under the bus because she

has become a political liability.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 


That's just semantics. She's a paid democratic strategist, pundit and media relations expert.

It matters little though, because her comments have been taken out of context.
edit on 13/4/2012 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:56 AM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


So how's this war on the Moms going to be conducted in strategical terms.

Usual infiltration by paid Al Quaeda mercenaries with subsequent air strikes and maybe a bit literal warfare along the coastlines, or are they going for the full shock-n-awe package ?

And by the way, aren't there Mom-Democrats as well, and will they bomb themselves to smithereens as well ?

I'm confused.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 11:59 AM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 





He didn't. Obama came out and threw Hilary Rosen under the bus because she

has become a political liability.



NO, he threw her under the bus because it made him look ever so magnanimous, and knew it would win him brownie points, all part of the plan.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:00 PM
link   
Anyone have the link to the Democratic party's open declaration of war on moms?

Because the link I read was pretty inane, like most of the crap coming out of that website.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:04 PM
link   

Originally posted by Furbs
Anyone have the link to the Democratic party's open declaration of war on moms?

Because the link I read was pretty inane, like most of the crap coming out of that website.


Didn't you get the memo?

It's now been changed to class warfare.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by kosmicjack
reply to post by Blarneystoner
 


That's just semantics. She's a paid democratic strategist, pundit and media relations expert.

It matters little though, because her comments have been taken out of context.
edit on 13/4/2012 by kosmicjack because: (no reason given)


They already updated the Hilary Rosen Wikipedia page!

It will be there forever now.

You can't unring a bell.

- Hilary Rosen Scandal - War on Moms -



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 





He didn't. Obama came out and threw Hilary Rosen under the bus because she

has become a political liability.



NO, he threw her under the bus because it made him look ever so magnanimous, and knew it would win him brownie points, all part of the plan.



No, this was not part of the plan.


David Axelrod has a HUGE headache right now.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:13 PM
link   



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
This just further illustrates the insufferable attitude of those on the left who don't fit into their narrow definitions.

It's only the begining of a long hot summer.





Oh yes,

One person represents the entire left, talk about the most narrow definition possible



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:19 PM
link   
Let's take Ann Romney out of this discussion for a second. Let's take me. I am an upper-middle class suburban married housewife mom. Let's say someone asked me to advise them on issues facing inner-city lower-economic single working moms. Someone else objected and said, "She can't advise on those issues, she has never lived in the inner-city her whole life; she has always had a middle to upper-middle class lifestyle; she stays at home raising her child."

Should I consider that a personal attack on me? Should we all consider that an attack on all suburban married housewives everywhere? Of course not.

I'm compassionate - I donate canned food on food drives; donate clothes/furniture/toys to Goodwill - these things all help people like inner-city single working moms. Does that qualify me to advise on the issues facing this group of women? Absolutely not. Fact.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:20 PM
link   
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 
The Buffet tax is a sham as well.

Who in the heck wants a tax on income made from income that was already taxed???



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:20 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer


They'll make "being successful" the new insult.


Well hopefully they will point out the sense of not having an Elite who makes

$58,000 a day govern a nation of people who are lucky to make that in a year.

Who do you think he is going to focus on?



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 
The Buffet tax is a sham as well.

Who in the heck wants a tax on income made from income that was already taxed???



So only the investment class who engage in speculation and raise the price of goods
on everything are free from taxes



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by Eurisko2012
 
The Buffet tax is a sham as well.

Who in the heck wants a tax on income made from income that was already taxed???



It's just another way for Obama to poke a stick in the eye of the capitalists.

He HATES the private sector.


edit on 13-4-2012 by Eurisko2012 because: (no reason given)



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by xuenchen
 


It "may" is not evidence.

Nice spin piece though.



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by braindeadconservatives

Originally posted by beezzer


They'll make "being successful" the new insult.


Well hopefully they will point out the sense of not having an Elite who makes

$58,000 a day govern a nation of people who are lucky to make that in a year.

Who do you think he is going to focus on?


WHO CARES ABOUT HOW MUCH MONEY HE MADE?

Sorry, didn't mean to shout. It's about policy. Not bank accounts.

Fail.

Epic bloody fail!



posted on Apr, 13 2012 @ 12:40 PM
link   
All of you....regardless if you realize this lady who made the comments is no one or are one of the Republican defense drones....you are all missing the point.

Romney IS NOT going to make the USA a better place (well unless you are one of his cronies).

The POTUS is not going to make the USA a better place (well unless you are on the dole and like a police state)

The Repubs boast for small gov....what a lie and crock of shiz...they just want a "different" big gov....one where their defense contractor buddies and the Military industrial machine can fleece us out of our taxes for their profits.

The Dems just want to keep building an abomination bureaucracy which bleeds the coffers of revenue, strips our freedoms and accomplishes nothing.

When are people going to get it?

Both of the "Two parties" suck...it's a gigantic sham and you are all letting them do it. You do realize there are many-many other parties out there and if you get your head out of the sand and realize you are being snookered...you might take the time and investigate them and find one "that actually represents" real American values and goals.

I said it earlier and I will say it again...the "two parties" are two wings of the same Bird of Prey. Open your eyes and let this meaninless pundit trash go...no one really-really cares and it really-really is a waste of breath...it means nothing....at all.





new topics

top topics



 
18
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join