reply to post by Eurisko2012
I figured my Pro - Capitalism post would wake you up.
Let's have a look what that little brain of yours came up with in terms of "clever replies"
Socialism does not work. Just look at Greece.
Wait! So you posted that "free market capitalism is the most prosperous system in the world", to which I replied it's a THEORETICAL system that has
never been applied in practice. And your reply is "socialism doesn't work"???
What on earth does that have to do with my reply??? I said NOTHING about socialism! Do you even read other people's posts before replying, or do you
simply copy/paste some random slogans from a campaign newsletter you found somewhere??
The Democrats declaring War on Moms does not work either.
It was ONE PUNDIT making a claim that was attacked from pretty much all Democrats from the start...and you call that a war??? What do you call the
GOP's VERY active campaign of taking away women's reproductive, salary, and workplace rights? If one pundit making a claim is a "war", surely the
GOP's actions are a friggin' galactic war!!
What was Hilary Rosen thinking ???
I dunno, I'm not in her head. Having said that, she was actually stating FACTS. Mrs Romney clearly can't relate to the struggles of the average
American woman (mom or otherwise). She never had to work or worry about money, and had FIVE NANNIES to help raise her children!! FIVE!!! I'm a guy,
and not that great with babies, but give me 5 nannies and you won't hear me complain...ever!!
Let me repeat this: FIVE NANNIES!!!
So yeah, raising children is hard, but Rosen's statement that Mrs Romney had it a LOT easier than the average American woman is 100% the truth.
Now the White House is - demanding - she stay away from Meet The Press.
They don't want to give her gaffe legs. Too late.
That's because Obama is the WORST political poker player in history. 99% of the time he shies away from a fight, no matter how good his hand is.
The GOP's actions and the legislation they push for is sooooooooo anti-women, Obama should have a field day destroying them on this subject...but
once again, he takes the easy "no-confrontation" route. He has it WAY too easy during this campaign and doesn't even have to work hard to put up a
The GOP can't win this election because:
1) Can't get Latino votes...the Arizona measures and other laws make that pretty much impossible.
2) Can't get women votes...they're fighting for them now, but the Dems just have to highlight all the anti-women legislation the GOP is currently
pushing for and it's going to be game over for them.
Those 2 points alone mean it's "game over" for the GOP numbers wise...but they have one more main issue:
3) Lead candidate (Romney) is too far detached from the average American and built his entire career around FIRING PEOPLE and BREAKING UP COMPANIES.
He will lose the "unemployment" battle against Obama (or anyone else for that matter).
In short, the media circus will pretend it's all a big "contest", but in the end Obama will get another four years. And yes, you can quote me on
this, save this post somewhere if you want.
Am I happy about this? If the alternative is Romney (or anyone else on the GOP side), yeah, happy. But not happy overall, Obama's done some pretty
crappy stuff like the indefinite detention act crap. But he's 100% the "lesser evil"...its' just sad that there's only 2 options. If Obama and
Romney were girls you had to rate, Obama would be someone like Pamela Anderson (looks good on the outside, but you know you'll get Hepatitis if you
get down with her), and Romney would be the bad guy from the movie "Spawn"...and you HAVE to make out with one of them. I'm picking Pam Anderson,
thx very much