It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by addygrace
It doesn't take much to unravel christianity when all I have to do is ask for proof.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
Well why did the guy write a book titled "Origin of Species..."
Because it's catchy??? Technically the origin goes back to before the big bang, doesn't mean he has to include that too
The theory never makes a single statement regarding how life started...and I have to admit I'm a bit baffled you didn't know that.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by addygrace
It doesn't take much to unravel christianity when all I have to do is ask for proof.
The resurrection is the most indisputable fact in human history, and the most documented.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
Well why did the guy write a book titled "Origin of Species..."
Because it's catchy??? Technically the origin goes back to before the big bang, doesn't mean he has to include that too
The theory never makes a single statement regarding how life started...and I have to admit I'm a bit baffled you didn't know that.
That's quite understandable, I'm baffled you know how to tie your own shoes. You're defending a theory that is impossible mathematically. But maybe you just aren't so good with math, it's possible.
God said "Let there be...".
I've never adhered to "blind belief" nor suggested it to anyone. I've only been a Christian for a short part of my adult life. You don't know crap about where I came from, which is obvious.
Try telling that to those who formerly worshiped demons. They will look a you like you're a complete moron, then may ask you if you wish to see the bite and scratch scars. Then ask them what Name makes the demons shudder in terror.
WRONG! Evolutionary Biologists don't have a clue. Molecular Biologists know unless they are morons that it's an impossibility by chance of random processes. They are jumping the Darwinian Evolution ship in DROVES.
I suppose you go to your oil change mechanic for back surgery?
Straw man. I've already gave you numerous breadcrumbs.
You just used a straw man, and you're arguing for a theory that was proved impossible with the discovery of DNA and RNA, by way of a process that has factors of probability greater then 10^5000th power.
Don't dare talk to me about "logical". Scientists will tell you anything with a probability of 10^50th is "impossible". You're arguing for something that's = impossible X 1,000.
Your bubble was burst long ago. Any experiment envisioned and designed by human thought and activated by human engineering is an experiment proving INTELLIGENT DESIGN. It's by definition NOT RANDOM.
That's a lie or you're still standing on the well worn path of complete ignorance with your eyes gouged out and fingers in your ears shouting "Na, na, na, na, na, I CANT hear yooooooooooooou!!!!" and I'm saying: "Come on little fella, science is over here, leave the Evolutionary Biologists on that path leading over a the cliff of absurdity, this way bro, this way."
Why try and entertain your red herring Mr. Logic? Explain why I should do so, this will be interesting. FOCUS. I don't need the Bible to prove Evolution is absurd. 101 level Molecular Biologists are doing that for me!!! And when the subject is the accuracy of the Bible then we can discuss that, until then throw your herring back into the pond of irrational thought and argumentation, let the little guy grow some more, he's just a guppy.
If you don't believe in the bible's god, would you so kindly tell me your thoughts on the following:
1.Where in the Bible does it give the age of the Universe?
2.If God was involved in the flood, what exactly would God be limited to in regards to how many numbers of animals could be saved? Are we limiting God with our tiny speck of knowledge? Seriously??????? No really, seriously???
Genesis 7
The LORD then said to Noah, “Go into the ark, you and your whole family, because I have found you righteous in this generation. 2 Take with you seven pairs of every kind of clean animal, a male and its mate, and one pair of every kind of unclean animal, a male and its mate, 3 and also seven pairs of every kind of bird, male and female, to keep their various kinds alive throughout the earth. 4 Seven days from now I will send rain on the earth for forty days and forty nights, and I will wipe from the face of the earth every living creature I have made.”
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
Well why did the guy write a book titled "Origin of Species..."
Originally posted by CaptainNemo
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
How is it the "nail in Darwin's coffin" if his theory makes no claims regarding how life started
Well why did the guy write a book titled "Origin of Species..."
I literally just spat my tea out. HAHAHAHA
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Deetermined
Despite the similarities in human and chimp genomes
We actually share more similarities with sunflower plants than chimps, guess we had a common ancestor with them too.
The creature, Otavia antiqua, was found in 760-million-year-old rock in Namibia and was as tiny as it may be important.
"The fossils are small, about the size of a grain of sand, and we have found many hundreds of them," said study leader Anthony Prave, a geologist at the University of St. Andrews in the U.K.
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by addygrace
It doesn't take much to unravel christianity when all I have to do is ask for proof.
The resurrection is the most indisputable fact in human history, and the most documented.
Oh is it now?
Well then, kindly present your OBJECTIVE evidence that prove beyond a doubt it happened. And no, the bible isn't objective evidence
By the way, love how you completely ignore that you just showed everyone that you didn't even know the difference between abiogenesis and evolution.
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by MrXYZ
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
Originally posted by Garfee
reply to post by addygrace
It doesn't take much to unravel christianity when all I have to do is ask for proof.
The resurrection is the most indisputable fact in human history, and the most documented.
Oh is it now?
Well then, kindly present your OBJECTIVE evidence that prove beyond a doubt it happened. And no, the bible isn't objective evidence
By "objective" do you mean the evidence approved by those who deny it?
You never provide any evidence to back up your claims...so yeah, every single one of your post is a great example of "blind belief"
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
By the way, love how you completely ignore that you just showed everyone that you didn't even know the difference between abiogenesis and evolution.
Why? Because I refuse to acknowledge the Evolutionist's equivocation fallacy? Gotcha. Any other nuggets of wisdom to share with the class?
You still haven't answered my 1 question and "we don't know yet", isn't a valid response.
No...that's not what objective evidence is!
Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by MrXYZ
No...that's not what objective evidence is!
You didn't even know earlier that "experiment" and "repeatable" observations are interchangeable terms in the definition of the scientific method.