It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by prisoneronashipoffools
I disagree the problem is you are assuming a total economic collapse of America at this time, would look like Argentina or Russia or that global trade will still be continuing. The worlds economies are tied together now, meaning that if America goes it probably won't be an isolated thing and all the worlds economies will tumble. And, also it works the other way too, if to many other nations economies collapse than America's economy will go down. Meaning that it will probably be a global meltdown if it happens. At that point America's going to lose a lot of soldiers real fast, many will be stranded in foreign countries, the majority of those in country aren't going to serve for free.
Also unlike Russia and Argentina there are far more guns in the hands of the citizens of America, which in itself will cause a rapid degradation of society as panic sets in and will also create a huge problem for remaining military forces in the US in trying to regain and maintain control, basically what government left will probably have to fight the people for every region and state.Add to that fact that Russia was a communist country and use to complete control how do you think the American citizens will act when they see the government begin to exert martial law and complete control. Well, maybe you think I watch to many movies or play to many video games, but I also hang around ATS and see plenty of armed citizens who will rise up against and fight such actions; like martial law and complete governmental military control, whether they are necessary or not.
Maybe, it won't happen that way, but frankly I think the current factors and variables in the US, mean that a total economic collapse of America will not play out the same as the examples you have shown. At the very least if I were you I wouldn't so absolutely sure as you seem about the outcome. Both of our views are simple speculation after all.
And that is just an economic collapse, not even talking about a global or national wide natural disaster situation. And I do agree SHTF can mean many things and come in many forms, but I am basing my definition on a complete collapse of government and society, irregardless of the cause.
**Addition**
In addition your Russian example is assuming that the American government will try to maintain control, keep food moving to your local store and keep the American people fed. The sad thing is I don't know if that would even be the case, the government is busy building lots of underground bases for themselves, it could be sad reality, that if a SHTF situation occurs, the government may just disappear underground and leave the citizens to fend for themselves.
edit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: typoedit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: typoedit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: addition
Originally posted by rickymouse
I don't even like the color of gold. I know, my perception is wrong. I'm lucky there aren't and nuthouses around because that is so abnormal. My kind is a threat to capitalism and present society Do they serve peanuts or cashews in those nuthouses?
Originally posted by Nephlim
Originally posted by prisoneronashipoffools
I disagree the problem is you are assuming a total economic collapse of America at this time, would look like Argentina or Russia or that global trade will still be continuing. The worlds economies are tied together now, meaning that if America goes it probably won't be an isolated thing and all the worlds economies will tumble. And, also it works the other way too, if to many other nations economies collapse than America's economy will go down. Meaning that it will probably be a global meltdown if it happens. At that point America's going to lose a lot of soldiers real fast, many will be stranded in foreign countries, the majority of those in country aren't going to serve for free.
Also unlike Russia and Argentina there are far more guns in the hands of the citizens of America, which in itself will cause a rapid degradation of society as panic sets in and will also create a huge problem for remaining military forces in the US in trying to regain and maintain control, basically what government left will probably have to fight the people for every region and state.Add to that fact that Russia was a communist country and use to complete control how do you think the American citizens will act when they see the government begin to exert martial law and complete control. Well, maybe you think I watch to many movies or play to many video games, but I also hang around ATS and see plenty of armed citizens who will rise up against and fight such actions; like martial law and complete governmental military control, whether they are necessary or not.
Maybe, it won't happen that way, but frankly I think the current factors and variables in the US, mean that a total economic collapse of America will not play out the same as the examples you have shown. At the very least if I were you I wouldn't so absolutely sure as you seem about the outcome. Both of our views are simple speculation after all.
And that is just an economic collapse, not even talking about a global or national wide natural disaster situation. And I do agree SHTF can mean many things and come in many forms, but I am basing my definition on a complete collapse of government and society, irregardless of the cause.
**Addition**
In addition your Russian example is assuming that the American government will try to maintain control, keep food moving to your local store and keep the American people fed. The sad thing is I don't know if that would even be the case, the government is busy building lots of underground bases for themselves, it could be sad reality, that if a SHTF situation occurs, the government may just disappear underground and leave the citizens to fend for themselves.
edit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: typoedit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: typoedit on 31-3-2012 by prisoneronashipoffools because: addition
i agree, in that kind of example gold would be worthless. there are alot of examples were gold would be worthless.. but what if we just go through a great depression like the one 90 years ago?? What if the economy just keeps going down till we become a second world country?? What if unemployment shoots up to 35%???
the way our economy is going something is ganna happen economically, 100% guarantee. we just don't know to what degree or how horrible it will be.
other things can happen like nuclear war, civil war, earthquakes, tsunamis, manbearpig, we just don't know so we have to be prepared for anything. do you really not think the u.s. economy can't fail?? with a scenario like the great depression where we'd still have internaitonal trade?/? it only happened 90 years ago..
edit on 31-3-2012 by Nephlim because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by rickymouse
reply to post by Nephlim
Everything doesn't crash when a severe depression occurs. Money is recalled and metals take on values. Copper, silver, and other semiprecious metals are a better alternative unless you are trading in huge amounts of commodities. for the regular guy investing a little into these metals now can make trading easier later.. a pound of copper in small pieces is easier to buy food with than an ounce of gold. Who has change for the gold for a small transaction like buying a bushel of potatoes. An ounce of silver would buy them though. Why would a farmer want a bunch of gold around attracting big time crooks anyway. Gold attracts some types of people and I haven't figured out exactly why yet. I like copper and brass myself. Semiprecious gems have always been a traded commodity amongst the lower class. Diamonds and high end gems was traded amongst the rich in the past. Capitalism taught people that the diamonds were needed to portray wealth. Just a wizards ploy.
Originally posted by syrinx high priest
you can tell who has spent money on gold recently in this thread
tell me, did you buy paper gold or did they mail you some real gold ?
Originally posted by Drezden
People cannot eat gold anymore than they can eat paper money. In a SHTF scenario seeds, oil, medicine, clothes..etc.. will be the most valuable trade goods. What are you going to do with gold if you need to trade for something. How much will the gold actually be worth to the people you are trying to buy things from in the theoretical SHTF world? I can have your gold coins which will be a weight in my pocket... and I give you medicine and seeds to start a garden.. no thanks, I'd rather hold out and trade for something more useful.
Thoughts?
I realize gold would be valuable if the economy crashes and there is a strong government (actually no.. the government will seize most of the gold.. you can still hide some I suppose)... but in a true SHTF scenario gold will be utterly worthless for several years.. or for however long it takes for a monetary system to become practical again.