It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by camus154
Originally posted by randyvs
You really are bringing nothing to the table of any value as far as getting down to brass tax of what may be an actual cause that we're looking at here. No one needs your negative bull. Try to come up something that will determine cause like the rest of us. Don't be so pathetic.
Oh puh-lease. Let's not have any false delusions of grandeur here, lest we think all of this is nothing more than massive ego stroking.
Not a single one of you has brought anything even remotely close to the table that helps explain the CAUSE here. All you're all doing is arguing over times and dates because "the truth is interesting".
Perhaps you'd like to change that now and start explaining how, even if a 188 cycle does exist, how that goes towards explaining a thing?
Originally posted by pheonix358
Ok so draw a line through the sun and the earth and point your telescope in that direction. It is not hard to do. There is only a small area of sky to search. It is either there or it is not. It could also be something like a black hole, very far away but very very powerful. Whatever it is it is along a very narrow corridor, one that would be narrow enough to search with a telescope. No Johnny, not the one you got from Tandy.
Originally posted by XtraTL
Has everyone just conveniently forgotten that the prediction was for an earthquake on 22nd March in the New Madrid fault zone?
Well, 22nd March hasn't happened yet, and the quake in Mexico was not in the New Madrid zone. The places that are in the zone are Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, Arkansas, Kentucky, Tennessee and Mississippi. So unless Mexico has moved, this prediction was totally and completely wrong.
You can't just change a prediction after the fact, otherwise it is not a prediction any more.
How would this prediction have been of any use if everyone in those states evacuated on March 22nd?
Or, what happens if an earthquake in the New Madrid zone happens on March 22nd? Will you then say that yesterday's event was not the real one? If so, then why are you saying that it is the real one right now?
And furthermore, if this supposed 188 day cycle is real, how come it doesn't extend back into the past before those 4 quakes? And how come there is no significance to 188 days (it is just over 6 months).
It's random cherry-picking of data, and everyone reading this site knows it.
Originally posted by antmax21
I still can't by the theory because it leaves out so many other quakes that are of a high magnitude and do not equal the 188 theory. That said, it is still of sufficient proof that something with the last 5 major earthquakes to hit cities has been on point. I find it interesting that 188 times two is little over a year. The cycle is circular for the 188 and it seems that it is moving up towards.....
Yes you guessed it...USA.