It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DaTroof
I see a growing number of people throw around phrases like "I support the Constitution" or "So-and-so candidate will protect the Constitution."
Well, which Constitution are we talking about, the original one signed in 1787 with 10 Amendments, or the one that exists today with 27 total Amendments, one of which repealing a previous Amendment?
If you support the Constitution, then you must also support the ability to amend the Constitution, since that's in the Constitution. en.wikipedia.org...
So, what are Constitutionalists actually afraid of? The Constitution can and will be amended, as written in the Constitution, and Amendments can be repealed anyway.
Originally posted by DaTroof
I see a growing number of people throw around phrases like "I support the Constitution" or "So-and-so candidate will protect the Constitution."
Well, which Constitution are we talking about, the original one signed in 1787 with 10 Amendments, or the one that exists today with 27 total Amendments, one of which repealing a previous Amendment?
If you support the Constitution, then you must also support the ability to amend the Constitution, since that's in the Constitution. en.wikipedia.org...
So, what are Constitutionalists actually afraid of? The Constitution can and will be amended, as written in the Constitution, and Amendments can be repealed anyway.
Originally posted by michaelbrux
There is only one Constitution and it is a 'living' document providing a strict set of rules managing how it evolves.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
This is the thing that always flabbergasts me.
I'm not from the USA, but, as far as I understand, the Supreme Court of the United States adjudicates whether something is constitutional or not.
Therefore, every single piece of legislation in the US today is, by definition, ''constitutional'', as it has either been upheld or not struck down by the SCOTUS.
I think that self-styled ''constitutionalists'' are merely control freaks who want to live in some la-la ''libertarian'' fantasy land, which is only governed by their rules.
edit on 17-3-2012 by Sherlock Holmes because: (no reason given)
There was an outstanding debt of 17 million silver Lira from french banks over 21 separate occasions all due on December 1, 1789.
Therefore, a bankruptcy Charter had to be drafted. On September 17, 1787, twelve State delegates approved the Constitution. The States have now become Constitutors.
"Constitutor: In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another's debt."
--Blacks Law Dictionary 6th Ed.
The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not. The people are not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote.
The judge in the Padleford case stated; "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do, they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain."
--Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520
"Articles" establish a sovereign nation of people, but all "Constitutions" are bankruptcy charters or compacts.
President Andrew Jackson paid the debt in the 1830's. In 1832, while discussing the Bank Renewal Bill to a delegation of bankers, he said, "You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out."
The Articles of Confederation
are still in operation.
Originally posted by DaTroof
reply to post by onthedownlow
Fair enough, but how do they feel about Amendments? Are they afraid of "losing a right" which can just be repealed or amended again??? Seems irrational to me.