It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site --Now Seen in Unprecedented Detail

page: 13
14
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 07:49 PM
link   
reply to post by webstra
 



....realize that much you've been told isn't true....that's a start.


OH??

Then "educate" me.

(This should be entertaining!!)

oh and...I wasn't "told" anything.....I actually used my brain, and life experience, to understand a lot of things.

Give it a try.....using your brain, for a start.......



jra

posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 08:00 PM
link   

Originally posted by webstra
realize that much you've been told isn't true....that's a start.


Actually, explaining what you believe isn't true and why, would be a start. Just making a simple claim one line claim doesn't do much to further the discussion, and tends to provoke some people.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 08:03 PM
link   

Originally posted by ProudBird
reply to post by webstra
 



....realize that much you've been told isn't true....that's a start.


OH??

Then "educate" me.

(This should be entertaining!!)

oh and...I wasn't "told" anything.....I actually used my brain, and life experience, to understand a lot of things.

Give it a try.....using your brain, for a start.......


The way you are reacting looks frightning...relax Proudbird.

Realizing your thinkings in the past were not right doesn't mean the world will come thumbling down...believe me ;-)



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:21 PM
link   
reply to post by webstra
 


That has to do with what exactly?



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:22 PM
link   
reply to post by longjohnbritches
 


That has what to do with anything?



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:26 PM
link   
reply to post by longjohnbritches
 


You have not offered a source yet, you first. I have sources bookmarked, like I said, I don't offer a free education without effort on your part. You can just sit in your lazy boy an make demands but you are inconsequential, a sourceless windpipe. In fact this entire thread you made no efforts to verify anything you say other than some stupid Ausie kid.

You haven't even stepped to the plate yet, so you are not even in the game.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 09:28 PM
link   
reply to post by longjohnbritches
 


Exactly where in your fantasy do you see me agreeing with anything you spew?



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 10:00 PM
link   
exciting times! Who will win the moon race!

By the time we are ready to go to the moon it won't matter what nation gets there.. nations won't exist.



posted on Mar, 16 2012 @ 10:03 PM
link   
reply to post by Illustronic
 

Hi Ill,
Where ya been?
Could you repeat that, I had my headphones on so I could study these space photographs better without being interupted.
Thanks ole pal



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 11:20 AM
link   
reply to post by webstra
 


"thumbling down"?

A new phrase has been entered into the lexicon.

Amazing.

BTW...(that means "by the way", by the way).....have you engaged your brain, yet?

Try it....you might like it....



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by bicnarok

The Apollo 11 Moon Landing Site --Now Seen in Unprecedented Detail


www.dailygalaxy. com

This is obviously fake. The television camera should be 100 feet (30 m) away from the lunar module descent stage.


edit on 17-3-2012 by Ove38 because: link fix



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


Have you measured it you do have the resolution of the picture



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:43 PM
link   
Does it not seem unlikely that NASA got to the moon 42 years ago when even with the vast advances in technology the best we can do today is crash a probe into the moon?

www.youtube.com...

Seriously? "Under proposals adopted by the Obama administration, US astronauts must now hitch lifts into space aboard Russian Soyuz rockets until private US space companies can take on the job."

www.guardian.co.uk...

www.youtube.com...

This is a funny story on moon rock that turned out to be fake.

www.telegraph.co.uk...

"Why didn’t NASA make a signal from the Moon that could be seen by everybody on Earth without aid of their TV set? The Apollo astronauts could have done this with magnesium flares or similar technology and it would have been a spectacular display for all to see - proof of their accomplishment."

"NASA claims to have conveniently lost all the original Apollo 11 high-quality video and data telemetry tapes so experts cannot examine their authenticity. Blueprints and designs of certain machines are missing as well such as the Apollo Lunar Module and rover."

www.atlanteanconspiracy.com...

The radiation belt issue is never dealt with,

www.newscientist.com...

This is a great site on the issue of space radiation ocii.com...

Also this section deals with the exhaust plumes ocii.com...



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by longjohnbritches
 


You have not offered a source yet, you first. I have sources bookmarked, like I said, I don't offer a free education without effort on your part. You can just sit in your lazy boy an make demands but you are inconsequential, a sourceless windpipe. In fact this entire thread you made no efforts to verify anything you say other than some stupid Ausie kid.

You haven't even stepped to the plate yet, so you are not even in the game.


Hey ole buddy
Before you dazzel us all here with those sourses. LOOK before you leap my Prince.
An educated person or one that knows how to use a sourse or a can opener, would at least know who they were quoteing. You do not old pal of mine.
LOL and 3 stars from some crackpots. Trump wouldn't hesitate to say You're FIRED
edit on 17-3-2012 by longjohnbritches because: could not stop laughing



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:02 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


I got 30 meters using a protractor and the image. good catch, more evidence the pic is authentic



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


Hi Ove,
very interesting.
Do you think you could tell me why the craters seem to be upsidedown?
Is it just me?



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:15 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


Were did you get the info that the camera was a 100ft away



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:19 PM
link   

Originally posted by wmd_2008
reply to post by Ove38
 


Were did you get the info that the camera was a 100ft away


From Neil Armstrong

4:30 > www.youtube.com...



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by longjohnbritches
reply to post by Ove38
 


Hi Ove,
very interesting.
Do you think you could tell me why the craters seem to be upsidedown?
Is it just me?


Your eyes are failing posiible reason



posted on Mar, 17 2012 @ 03:26 PM
link   
reply to post by Ove38
 


Here is a link to the Apollo 11 traverse map

www.lpi.usra.edu...

That has a scale using GIMP photosoftware and its measurement tool you can measure the number of pixels to compare the traverse map with the picture photo matches the map!!!!

edit on 17-3-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
14
<< 10  11  12    14  15  16 >>

log in

join