It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by justwokeup
No, however its reasonable that full facial concealment be grounds for being denied entry to commercial premises and public buildings (at the discretion of the organisation owning the building). The same would apply to public transport.
Thats a reasonable compromise.
You on the other hand have been fighting for the right of all Muslims to wear burqas. Whether they want to or not.
That being said, the Hadith requires Muslim men and women to dress moderately in public. This requirement may be interpreted differently within the denominations. However, if a sect of the Islamic religion believes that wearing a burka is dressing moderately in public and in their tradition, let it be.
Originally posted by voidla
reply to post by DavidWillts
Racist how?
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
Originally posted by justwokeup
No, however its reasonable that full facial concealment be grounds for being denied entry to commercial premises and public buildings (at the discretion of the organisation owning the building). The same would apply to public transport.
Thats a reasonable compromise.
A reasonable compromise for whom? If private organisation and public transport are going to start banning people because of their dress code, what is to stop them from dictating what people should wear?
I think that if a business starts discriminating on religious grounds, they will identify themselves as religious bigots.
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Probably one the dumbest and racist ideas i have ever heard. Why not ban baggy clothes? Or ban big sunglasses or hoods?
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Probably one the dumbest and racist ideas i have ever heard. Why not ban baggy clothes? Or ban big sunglasses or hoods?
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
reply to post by boncho
I don't think gang affiliated colours are analogous to religious dress unless you take a reductionist view on most things.
Originally posted by Rukas
If I cant walk into a bank, through airport security, or even down the street in a balaclava, then they shouldn't be allowed to wear the burqua.
Originally posted by sith9157
Originally posted by DavidWillts
Probably one the dumbest and racist ideas i have ever heard. Why not ban baggy clothes? Or ban big sunglasses or hoods?
Because baggy clothes, and big sunglasses do not completely hide ones identity
Originally posted by boncho
Originally posted by MI5edtoDeath
reply to post by boncho
I don't think gang affiliated colours are analogous to religious dress unless you take a reductionist view on most things.
No but the purpose of the ban would be similar. To ban a burqa because people are unidentifiable is similar to banning loose clothing that conceals items, gang colors that are used to provoke (although in the burqa argument that has some extreme implications).
I'm not saying right or wrong just pointing out previous actions that are similar.
Then you might as well ban makeup and wigs with Jackie O sunglasses.
And turned up collars....