It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Rukas
I wonder if there is a significance in his saying "6.9 out of 7" sure rather than 9.9 out of 10 or 99%. Why out of 7?
Originally posted by THE_PROFESSIONAL
Hes doing a copout. I am 100% sure god exists. Why can't he be sure of his beliefs. He is a hypocrite. Anyone can say you can't be 100% sure and when proof is discovered say well I didn't say 100%. He is only a biologist and does not know anything about physics, quantum theory, general relativity, cosmology, etc..
Originally posted by JailTales
Your argument makes no logical sense..
ag·nos·tic/agˈnästik/
Noun:
A person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena
Originally posted by Rukas
reply to post by miniatus
Is there a reason for that scale? I just found it odd. Not saying it has some deep meaning, I was just wondering why he chose to state it out of 7. Does he have a significant reason for it or did he just pick a random number?
Originally posted by kennyb72
reply to post by miniatus
Science originally has it's roots in religion. Early scientists where obviously pragmatic and serious scholars and much of today's scientific understanding is based on their early works. Their goal was to try to understand how he/she/GOD actually achieved creation.
To date science has only scratched the surface and yet has adopted the mantle that all things can be explained. Good luck Richard and all those that proclaim themselves to be atheist, Richard Dawkins has now by any definition pronounced himself to be agnostic.
It is ironic given our current understanding (if you can stretch the meaning that far) that quantum science is screaming out the existence of a creation beyond our comprehension, some of these proposed theories are so far 'out there' that it becomes easier to believe in GOD than it is to believe in a multiverse or quarks or spooky actions.
Originally posted by addygrace
The fact that he chose 6.9 out of 7 means he has went away from the 99.9% convinced their is no God, to 98.5%. It seems he's subtly letting us know he may be having a change of heart.
No scientist, worth his salt gives a percentage on the validity of God. You believe, don't believe, or are undecided.
Dawkins is not a famous scientist. He is a famous atheist. Although he is a scientist, he has only made a name for himself on the debate circuit, arguing against God.
Originally posted by Rukas
reply to post by miniatus
Is there a reason for that scale? I just found it odd. Not saying it has some deep meaning, I was just wondering why he chose to state it out of 7. Does he have a significant reason for it or did he just pick a random number?
Originally posted by Starchild23
I feel sorry for you...I really do. You must live a thoroughly miserable life if it all comes down to survival and then dying. How utterly depressing.
And narrow-minded.
Originally posted by izero
Originally posted by Rukas
reply to post by miniatus
Is there a reason for that scale? I just found it odd. Not saying it has some deep meaning, I was just wondering why he chose to state it out of 7. Does he have a significant reason for it or did he just pick a random number?
It is because Dawkins devised a scale of religiosity from 1 - 7. 1 being absolutely 100% believing in an intervening god. 7 being 100% certain there is no god. Wilting varying degrees of belief or lack of in between. I put myself at about 5.5 - 6. I don't believe in any form of higher power - but think some ideas are worth investigating.
Originally posted by ComeFindMe
The rational approach would be to accept that we can never be 100% certain - though i've yet to find a practising Christian who would even entertain the notion or remote possibility that there may not be a god....